Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06065332

Post-Procedural Biotech Cellulose Mask

Background: There are many post-procedural treatments touted to improve comfort and decrease downtime, but very few prospective randomized studies.

Aims: To analyze the safety and efficacy of a post-procedural biotech cellulose mask Patients/Method: Fifteen patients undergoing either a microneedling with radiofrequency (n=5), non-ablative fractional (n=5), or full erbium;YAG resurfacing (n=5) treatment were randomized to receive a Velez biotech cellulose mask on one side of the face for 30 minutes after the procedure and for two hours a day until healed. Canfield Visia photos and thermal photographs were taken 30 minutes after the procedure and daily until healed. The investigator and blind evaluators reviewed the photos and subjects answered daily questionnaires.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

22 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Siperstein Dermatology Group

Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472, United States

About this study

A dual center study was performed at a private practice in Boynton Beach and Boca Raton Florida. The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical guidelines and principles of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice. The protocol was approved on May 12th, 2022, by Sterling IRB.

Study Design:

The clinical research coordinator and investigator recruited, enrolled, and assigned 15 subjects into 3 arms, each with 5 subjects over two months. The side assigned a biotech cellulose mask for each subject was determined by random sorting using a computer-generated sequence and written on a label adhered to the mask packaging so the patient could remember while at home.

Treatment:

Topical anesthetic cream (benzocaine 20%, lidocaine 10%, and tetracaine 6%) was applied to the face for 30 minutes and wiped off with 70% isopropyl alcohol in all three arms. Those in arm 1 received a non-ablative fractionated thulium treatment (Moxi; Sciton) those in arm 2 received a microneedling with radiofrequency treatment (Secret; Cutera), and those in arm 3 received a fully ablative erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser resurfacing (Contour TRL; Sciton). Immediately after the procedure a biotech cellulose mask was applied (Hydration mask; Velez by Vesna) and left on for thirty minutes. Then digital photography using Canfield's imaging system and Flir's thermal camera was done. In addition, a subject questionnaire on satisfaction, erythema, edema, and pain levels after the procedure was completed. Patients used the typical post-care treatment on both sides of their face such as Vaseline for laser resurfacing and a hydrating serum for the NAFR and MRF. They were given additional half-sided masks to apply to the same assigned side of their face at home for at least two hours each day for the duration of the study. They returned to the office daily for questionnaires and photographs until deemed fully healed by the primary investigator signifying the end of the study. At all follow up visits, the primary investigator assessed the subject for any side effects and subjects were asked about side effects in questionnaires.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients willing to undergo a cosmetic procedure
  • Patients willing to apply a mask for 30 minutes after the procedure and daily
  • Patients willing to return to the office to take photos daily and allow use of photos in publication

Exclusion criteria

  • History of auto-immune conditions
  • History of keloids
  • History of severe anaphylactic reactions
  • Patients taking either anti-coagulants, chemotherapy, immunosuppressive agents, immunomodulatory agents, diuretics, antihistamines, or anti-inflammatory two weeks before or during planned treatments
  • Patients who are pregnant or nursing.

Treatment and study plan

Velez Intense Hydration Mask® (biotech cellulose face mask)

Other

Application to one randomized side half of a Velez Intense Hydration Mask® (biotech cellulose face mask)

Primary outcomes

  1. Temperature

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the procedure

    Change in skin temperature

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Siperstein Dermatology

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Split-Face Study Using a Post-Procedural Biotech Cellulose Mask to Improve Patient Comfort & Downtime

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 3, 2023
Registry last updated
Oct 3, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.