CREPS Auvergne Rhône-Alpes / Vichy
Bellerive-sur-Allier, Allier, 03321, France
NCT Number: NCT04364061
High-intensity interval exercise (HIIT), as compared to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), is a time-efficient strategy to decrease total and abdominal fat mass (FM). However, the mechanisms underlying such adaptations are not yet elucidated and research are still needed to establish the optimal HIIT according to subject characteristics. The aim of this study was to compare acute HIIE and MICE cycling exercises on enjoyment, post-exercise substrate oxidation, appetite and energy intakes over 24h in postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity. It is hypothesized that compared with the traditional MICE, HIIE could favor greater enjoyment, higher 2h-post-exercise fat oxidation and a similar energy intakes over 24h despite different post-exercise appetite perceptions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–75 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Bellerive-sur-Allier, Allier, 03321, France
The aim of this study was to compare acute HIIE and MICE cycling exercises on enjoyment, post-exercise substrate oxidation, and appetite and energy intakes over 24h in postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity.
Using a randomized crossover design, 12 postmenopausal women completed 3 cycling exercises at 6-days intervals:
i) Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) which consisted of 35 min cycling at 60-65% theorical Peak Heart Rate (thPHR) ii) High Intensity Interval Exercise 1 (HIIE 1) 60 cycles of speeding up for 8 s at 80-90%thPHR followed by pedaling slowly for 12 s (20min) iii) High Intensity Interval Exercise 2 (HIIE 2) which consisted of repeated 10 x 1min at 80-90% thPHR followed by pedaling slowly for 1min.
Substrate oxidation (CHO and FAT) were measured at rest and 2h- post exercise. Enjoyment, perceived exertion and appetite were recorded and post-exercise energy intakes were assessed over 24h.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participant completed a moderate intensity continuous cycling exercise (MICE) during 35 min at 60-65% thPHRmax
Participant completed a high-intensity interval cycling exercise (HIIE 1) during 20min with 60 cycles of speeding up for 8s and pedaling slowly for 12s at 80-90% thPHRmax
Participant completed a high-intensity interval cycling exercise (HIIE 2) during 20min with 10 x 1-min bouts at 80-90% thPHRmax, separated by 1-min recovery bouts
Time frame: 2 hours post-exercise
CHO and FAT oxidation were measured after each modality with indirect calorimetry during 2 hours post-exercise
Time frame: Immediately post-exercise
Perceive enjoyment evaluated with Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES) for each modalities. The total scores of PAES are between 18 and 126 with the higher scores indicating greater enjoyment.
Time frame: During exercise (5-10-15 and 20 minutes for HIIE1 and 2 ; 9-18-27 and 35 minutes for MICE) which corresponds at 25-50-75 and 100% of bout completion.
RPE evaluated with adapted Borg's Scale during exercise for each modalities
Time frame: Before, immediately post-exercise, 60 minutes and 120 minutes post-exercise
The validated 100 millimeters Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the subjective appetite at 4 time points: before, immediately post-exercise, 60 minutes and 120 minutes post-exercise. This scale comprised four questions anchored with words representing the opposing extreme states of desire to eat, hunger, fullness and prospective food consumption. The score of each question are between 0 and 100.
Time frame: 24 hours post-exercise
Estimated energy intakes using dietary questionnaires
Laboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en conditions Physiologiques et Pathologiques
Other
Comparison of Acute Cycling Modalities on Enjoyment, Post Exercise Substrate Oxidation, Appetite and Energy Intakes Over 24h in Postmenopausal Women With Overweight or Obesity
Acronym: EScAPE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03708055
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01482702
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Burlington, Vermont, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00342732
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details