Access Connections
Bamberg, South Carolina, 29003, United States
NCT Number: NCT00677235
The purpose of this study is to confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft for treatment of stenoses at the venous anastomosis of ePTFE or other synthetic arteriovenous (AV) access grafts.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bamberg, South Carolina, 29003, United States
The purpose of the study is to compare efficacy data on subjects randomized to treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft versus subjects randomized to treatment with PTA only.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Treatment of stenoses with primary PTA and placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
Treatment of stenoses with PTA only
Time frame: 12 months
To demonstrate that the post intervention Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) of FLAIR™ is superior to that of PTA at 12 months post study procedure.
Time frame: 12 months
The IPF is summarized was defined as the time from the index study procedure to complete graft abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the arteriovenous (AV) access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: Patient Follow-Up
The estimated number of re-interventions to the access circuit until graft abandonment or through 12 months post-index procedure was a secondary endpoint without hypothesis testing and is therefore summarized descriptively.
Time frame: 12 months
Postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.
Time frame: 12 months
Postintervention secondary patency [PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.
Time frame: Patient Follow-Up
Procedural success was a secondary endpoint without hypothesis testing and is therefore summarized descriptively. Procedural success is defined as anatomic success and at least one indicator of hemodynamic or clinical success.
Time frame: Patient Follow-Up
The incidence of device-related and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) from the index procedure through 30 days post procedure is summarized. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the Bard Peripheral Vascular (BPV) clinician training program.
Time frame: 12 months
Serious Adverse Events at 12 months are reported for all 270 subjects.
Time frame: 24 months
Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) was defined as the interval following the index procedure until the next access thrombosis or reintervention at 24 months.
Time frame: 24 months
To estimate the percentage of participants without safety issues through 24 months.
Time frame: 24 month follow up
Postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.
Time frame: 24 months
Postintervention secondary patency [PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.
Time frame: 24 months
The IPF is summarized was defined as the time from the index study procedure to complete graft abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.
Time frame: 6 month follow up
Postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.
Time frame: 6 month follow-up
Postintervention secondary patency [PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.
C. R. Bard
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Concurrently-Controlled Post-Approval Study of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
Acronym: RENOVA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01595841
Chronic Disease, Constriction, Pathologic
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02649946
Arteriovenous Fistula, Arteriovenous Malformations
Tempe, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04698512
Arteriovenous Fistula, Arteriovenous Malformations
Singapore
View Trial DetailsNCT02790606
Chronic Disease, Constriction, Pathologic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details