Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent
DeviceTreatment of stenoses with primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and placement of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent.
NCT Number: NCT02790606
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions in the upper extremity venous outflow of the Arteriovenous (AV) access circuit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
This study will compare the use of the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent (following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)) to safety and effectiveness performance goals (PGs) for the treatment of stenotic lesions in the upper extremity venous outflow of the arteriovenous (AV) access circuit of subjects dialyzing with an AV graft.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Clinical Inclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
Clinical Exclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
Treatment of stenoses with primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and placement of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent.
Time frame: 30 days post index procedure
Safety is defined as freedom from any adverse event(s) (AEs), localized or systemic, that reasonably suggests the involvement of the AV access circuit (not including stenosis or thrombosis) that require or result in any of the following alone or in combination: additional interventions (including surgery); in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; or death.
Time frame: 6 months post index procedure
Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access.
Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area.
The primary effectiveness endpoint is evaluated against a performance goal (PG) of 40%.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
TLPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access.
Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
ACPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention.
ACPP ends with a reintervention anywhere within the access circuit. Vessel rupture caused by PTA is not an ACPP failure unless achieving hemostasis also causes thrombosis.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure,
Number of Participants with device and procedure related Adverse Events involving the AV access circuit.
The access circuit is the area from the arterial inflow to the SVC-right atrial junction.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure.
Total Number of AV Access Circuit Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to the AV access circuit until access abandonment or through study completion.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to maintain target lesion patency.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
IPF is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
The IPF is representative of the number of days between interventions to maintain access circuit patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
IPF-T (Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion) is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or complete access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed at the target lesion in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
The IPF for target lesion patency is representative of the approximate (mean) number of days between interventions to maintain target lesion patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Secondary Patency is defined as the interval after the index intervention until the access is abandoned. Multiple repetitive treatments can be included in post-intervention secondary patency.
The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time frame: At time of index procedure
Technical Success is defined as successful deployment, based on the operator's opinion, of the implant to the intended location assessed at the time of the index procedure.
Time frame: At time of index procedure
Procedure Success is defined as anatomic success and resolution of the pre-procedural clinical indicator(s) (clinical success) of a hemodynamically significant stenosis.
C. R. Bard
Industry
Prospective, Multi-Center Clinical Study of the Bard® COVERA™ Arteriovenous (AV) Stent Graft in the Treatment of Stenosis at the Graft-Vein Anastomosis of AV Graft Circuits (AVeVA)
Acronym: AVeVA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02649946
Arteriovenous Fistula, Arteriovenous Malformations
Tempe, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03332264
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Graz, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT04698512
Arteriovenous Fistula, Arteriovenous Malformations
Singapore
View Trial DetailsNCT01970579
Constriction, Pathologic, Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
Bad Krozingen, Germany
View Trial Details