Family-informed intervention
BehavioralMultiple face-to-face visits, telephone calls and-person visits with the PAP psychologist and team
NCT Number: NCT04132999
Determine the efficacy of family-informed intervention (INT) vs standard clinical care over a period of twelve months in children with obstructive sleep apnea and Down Syndrome.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
Evaluate the effect of PAP adherence on quality of life, neurobehavioral, and healthcare utilization in children with DS and OSAS. It is being hypothesized that, irrespective of study arm, increased PAP adherence will be associated with better quality of life, neurobehavioral, and healthcare utilization outcomes.
Evaluate the effect of PAP adherence in children with DS and OSAS on patient-centered outcomes and family-relevant outcomes identified during the R61 phase of this research. It is being hypothesized that irrespective of study arm, increased PAP adherence will be associated with better patient-centered outcomes, and family-relevant outcomes identified during the first year of this research.
Determine the efficacy of INT vs. CON in promoting PAP adherence. It is being hypothesized that that children receiving INT will show significantly increased objectively-measured PAP adherence at 6 months compared with those receiving CON (Aim 4A). As a secondary aim (4B), it will be evaluated whether the improved adherence is maintained over 12 months. It is being hypothesized that participants initially randomized to the INT arm will have better adherence at 12 months compared to those in the CON arm.
Use mixed methods during the randomized controlled trial to identify family perceptions, such as empowerment and self-efficacy, regarding PAP use in youth with OSAS and DS. It is being hypothesized that INT-PAP will be associated with more positive perceptions compared to CON.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Multiple face-to-face visits, telephone calls and-person visits with the PAP psychologist and team
Support which is given as part of the standard clinical care for patients who are currently prescribed PAP.
Time frame: 6 months
PAP adherence will be assessed as the percentage of nights in which the participant is adherent to PAP therapy from initiation (T0) through 6 months (T6). This is calculated as the number of nights meeting adherence criteria divided by the total number of nights during the participant's study participation period, multiplied by 100.
Time frame: 6 months
PAP adherence will be measured as the number of minutes of PAP use per night among nights with any recorded PAP use, calculated per participant from PAP initiation through the end of the 6-month intervention period.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Quality of life will be measured using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) total score. The PedsQL is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4(0 = Never, 4 = Always), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Executive functioning will be assessed using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2) Parent Report. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores, which range from 30 to 120. Lower T-scores indicate better executive functioning, while higher T-scores indicate greater executive dysfunction.
Time frame: 12 months
PAP adherence will be assessed as the percentage of nights in which the participant is adherent to PAP therapy from initiation (T0) through 12 months (T12). This is calculated as the number of nights meeting adherence criteria divided by the total number of days during the participant's study participation period, multiplied by 100.
University of Miami
Other
Positive Airway Pressure for the Treatment of the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Children With Down Syndrome (Stage 2)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04115878
Abnormalities, Multiple, Apnea
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04124471
Abnormalities, Multiple, Apnea
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05508971
Abnormalities, Multiple, Apnea
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05933603
Abnormalities, Multiple, Apnea
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details