Assiut university
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05072899
Aim of This study is to compare between the effect of ultrasound-guided local injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)versus Hyaluronic (HA) for the treatment of chronic shoulder pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
This study was prospective randomized comparative trial on patients with chronic shoulder pain presented at outpatient Clinic of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department at Assiut University Hospitals from June 2019 to December 2020. Our study started by 70 patient with chronic shoulder pain 20 of them were missed in follow up period, the range of age from 36 - 56 years, history, clinical examination, Laboratory investigation, and imaging (X-ray or MRI) done for all patient to complete the diagnosis, patient divided randomly into two groups, Group (A) included 25 patients were treated by PRP injection and group (B) included 25 patients were treated by HA injection, both injections were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance. Randomization by sealed envelopes technique, the follow up was at the baseline, 4 weeks and 6 months post injection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
local injection of shoulder joint by platelet rich plasm
local injection of shoulder joint by Hyaluronic acid
Time frame: 4weeks post injection follow up.
0-10 visual analogue scale of pain
Time frame: 6 months post injection follow up
0-10 visual analogue scale of pain
Time frame: 4weeks post injection follow up.
This scoring system combines physical examination tests with subjective evaluations by the patients. The subjective assessment consists of 35 points and the remaining 65 points are assigned for the physical examination assessment. The subjective assessment includes a single item for pain (15 points) and 4 items for activities of daily living (20 points) (work 4, sport 4, sleep2 and positioning the hand in space 10 points). The objective assessment includes: range of motion (40 points) (forward elevation, 10 points; lateral elevation, 10 points; internal rotation, 10 points; external rotation, 10 points) and power (25 points) (scoring based on the number of pounds of pull the patient can resist in abduction to a maximum of 25 points). The total possible score is therefore 100 points.
Time frame: 6 months post injection follow up
This scoring system combines physical examination tests with subjective evaluations by the patients. The subjective assessment consists of 35 points and the remaining 65 points are assigned for the physical examination assessment. The subjective assessment includes a single item for pain (15 points) and 4 items for activities of daily living (20 points) (work 4, sport 4, sleep2 and positioning the hand in space 10 points). The objective assessment includes: range of motion (40 points) (forward elevation, 10 points; lateral elevation, 10 points; internal rotation, 10 points; external rotation, 10 points) and power (25 points) (scoring based on the number of pounds of pull the patient can resist in abduction to a maximum of 25 points). The total possible score is therefore 100 points.
Time frame: 4weeks post injection follow up.
is a self-introduction administered index designed to measure the effects of different pathologic conditions on the functional status of the shoulder. All items are rated by using a visual analogue scale from "no pain" or "no difficulty" to "worst imaginable pain" or "so difficult it required help". A numerical value was obtained by dividing the scale into 11 segments from 0 to 10 for each item
Time frame: 6 months post injection follow up
is a self-introduction administered index designed to measure the effects of different pathologic conditions on the functional status of the shoulder. All items are rated by using a visual analogue scale from "no pain" or "no difficulty" to "worst imaginable pain" or "so difficult it required help". A numerical value was obtained by dividing the scale into 11 segments from 0 to 10 for each item
Assiut University
Other
Platelet Rich Plasm Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Chronic Painful Shoulder: Randomized Comparative Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07508969
Chronic Shoulder Pain, Subacromial Bursitis of the Shoulder
Catanzaro, CZ, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07428512
Chronic Shoulder Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07302490
Arthralgia, Chronic Pain
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05481710
Arthralgia, Chronic Pain
Lamia, Central Greece, Greece
View Trial Details