Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
NCT Number: NCT04028765
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is a common occurrence of pregnancies at term. A delay from PROM to labor is associated with an increased risk of intrauterine infection and associated maternal and fetal morbidity; therefore, induction of labor (IOL) is recommended. The ideal agent for IOL is not known, particularly among specific subpopulations. The primary aim of this study is to determine if oxytocin (Pitocin) or oral misoprostol results in a shorter interval to delivery after the start of induction among nulliparous women with unfavorable cervical exams with term PROM.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) occurs in approximately 8% of pregnancies at term.1 Although onset of spontaneous labor is often prompt after membrane rupture, a delay from PROM to labor is associated with an increased risk of intrauterine infection and its associated maternal and fetal complications. For this reason, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) endorses induction of labor for PROM "if spontaneous labor does not occur near the time of presentation."
The optimal method for PROM induction is less clear. Prior literature has examined the use of Pitocin (Oxytocin), vaginal and oral misoprostol, and dinoprost with mixed results. The TermPROM study found an increased risk of chorioamnionitis and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission among women treated with vaginal misoprostol for induction.
The postulated link between vaginal misoprostol and chorioamnionitis is the need for vaginal examination for placement of the misoprostol; more vaginal examinations could potentially increase the risk for infection. Utilizing oral misoprostol would eliminate the need for a vaginal exam for administration, thereby potentially mitigating this risk of infection. Currently, vaginal and oral misoprostol as well as oxytocin are used routinely in clinical care based on provider discretion.
Among 7 randomized controlled trials examining the use of oral misoprostol as compared to oxytocin, two found oral misoprostol to result in faster induction to delivery, two found oxytocin to result in faster deliveries, and the remaining three found no difference between the two.3-9 These studies are limited by small sample size, inadequate reporting of patient demographics, varied misoprostol and oxytocin protocols, and inconsistent primary outcomes. Therefore, the utility of oral misoprostol in this population has not been established. Furthermore, its efficacy in specific patient populations is unreported in the literature.
The primary aim of this study is to determine if oxytocin or oral misoprostol results in a shorter interval to delivery after the start of induction among nulliparous women with unfavorable cervical exams with PROM.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral misoprostol 50 mcg every 4 hours for up to 6 doses or until cervical ripening is no longer indicated
IV Oxytocin 2 milliunits (mU)/min, increased by 2mU/min q15 minutes per hospital protocol
Time frame: Time (hours) from start of IOL (As defined by receipt of first medication for induction of labor) to delivery of infant.
Time (hours) from start of IOL (As defined by receipt of first medication for induction of labor) to delivery of infant.
Time frame: Enrollment to Delivery
Suspected intraamniotic infection
Time frame: Time (hours) from PROM (as reported by patient) to delivery of infant
Time frame: Time from IOL (as defined by receipt of first medication for induction) to vaginal delivery
Time frame: Time (hours) from PROM (as reported by patient) to vaginal delivery
Time frame: Enrollment to Delivery
Cesarean section rate
Time frame: Enrollment to 4 weeks postpartum
Composite maternal morbidity: postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, endometritis, wound infection, venous thromboembolism (VTE), hysterectomy, Intensive care unit (ICU) admission, readmission within 4 weeks, death
Time frame: Enrollment to hospital discharge (On average 2-4 days)
Composite neonatal morbidity: NICU admission > 48 hours, neonatal blood transfusion, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or IV, headcooling, severe respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, death
University of Pennsylvania
Other
POM PROM: Pitocin or Oral Misoprostol for PROM IOL in Nulliparous Women With Unfavorable Cervical Exams
Acronym: POM PROM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06078137
PROM
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05782036
Cardiac Surgery, PROM
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04538456
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Manchester, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05229016
Behavior, Health Behavior
New York, United States
View Trial Details