University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07366814
Endometrial biopsy is a commonly used outpatient procedure to evaluate abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding. Different sampling methods are available, but their diagnostic adequacy and patient experience may vary.
This prospective randomized study compares two commonly used endometrial biopsy methods, Pipelle and Karman cannula, under standardized paracervical block anesthesia. All participants receive the same local anesthetic technique to minimize pain-related differences between methods.
The primary objective is to compare the rate of clinically adequate endometrial samples obtained with each method. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported pain, patient satisfaction, procedure duration, need for additional diagnostic procedures, and hospital-related costs.
Study findings are expected to support clinical decision-making regarding the most effective and practical endometrial biopsy method when adequate pain control is provided.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Endometrial biopsy is an essential diagnostic procedure in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding. Office-based endometrial sampling techniques are widely used because these techniques are minimally invasive and cost-effective; however, diagnostic adequacy, patient tolerance, and resource utilization may differ between methods.
Pain during the procedure is a major factor affecting patient experience and may confound comparisons between sampling techniques. To address this limitation, participants receive a standardized paracervical block using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique, allowing the comparison to focus on the intrinsic performance of the biopsy methods rather than differences in analgesia.
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study. Eligible participants undergoing endometrial biopsy are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either Pipelle endometrial biopsy or Karman cannula endometrial sampling. Randomization is stratified by menopausal status. Procedures are performed in an outpatient setting according to routine clinical practice.
Histopathological evaluation of endometrial samples is performed by pathologists blinded to the sampling method. Sample adequacy is assessed based on predefined criteria, with a focus on whether the specimen provides sufficient information for clinical decision-making.
In addition to diagnostic adequacy, patient-reported outcomes, including pain and satisfaction with the procedure, are assessed. Procedure duration, need for additional diagnostic interventions due to inadequate sampling, and hospital-related costs associated with each method are also evaluated.
Standardized analgesia and inclusion of clinical, patient-centered, and economic outcomes are intended to provide practical evidence to guide the selection of endometrial biopsy methods in routine gynecologic practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endometrial sampling performed using a Pipelle device in an outpatient setting. The procedure is conducted under standardized paracervical block anesthesia using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique for all participants.
Other names: Pipelle de Cornier
Endometrial sampling performed using a Karman cannula in an outpatient setting. The procedure is conducted under standardized paracervical block anesthesia using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique for all participants.
Other names: Karman Cannula, Manual Vacuum Aspiration Cannula
Time frame: At the index procedure (same day)
Proportion of endometrial biopsy samples considered clinically adequate for diagnosis based on blinded histopathological assessment.
Time frame: Periprocedural
Eligible participants undergo outpatient endometrial sampling under a standardized analgesia protocol: 3 mL of 2% prilocaine is injected for a paracervical block at the 1 and 11 o'clock positions before tenaculum application, followed by a 2-minute waiting period; a tenaculum is then applied and endometrial sampling is performed using either a Pipelle device or a 5-mm Karman cannula according to random assignment. Sampling is recorded as the number of predefined sampling cycles (maximum 3), and cervical stenosis, need for dilation, procedure duration, additional analgesia (e.g., NSAIDs), and complications are documented. Specimens are placed immediately in formalin in identical containers labeled with study ID only, sent daily in mixed order, and evaluated by pathologists blinded to sampling method for adequacy and diagnosis (including reason for inadequacy). Pain is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (0-10; higher scores indicate worse pain) during the procedure and at 3
Time frame: Same day after the procedure
Patient-reported satisfaction with the endometrial biopsy procedure assessed using a Likert-type questionnaire, including willingness to undergo the same procedure again if needed.
Time frame: During the procedure
Time required to complete the endometrial biopsy procedure, measured from speculum insertion to completion of tissue sampling.
Time frame: Within 2 weeks after the procedure
Proportion of participants requiring additional diagnostic procedures due to an inadequate endometrial biopsy sample.
Time frame: Within 2 weeks after the procedure
Total hospital-related cost per participant, including procedural costs and costs related to additional diagnostic interventions when required.
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
Other Gov
Comparison of Pipelle and Karman Endometrial Biopsy Methods Under Standardized Paracervical Block: A Prospective Randomized Study
Acronym: PB-EMB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03809468
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Behavior
Weston, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07074795
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Agnosia
Bnei Brak, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT07518693
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Adenomyosis
Bengbu, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07229209
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Cesarean Section Complications
Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details