Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07229209

Oral Contraceptive Pills Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for Niche-Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy and niche morphological changes following treatment with combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) versus a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in women with symptomatic uterine niche-related abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

After eligibility and consenting, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated block randomization list (block size of six). Allocation concealment was maintained using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were opened after consent.

All participants had a transvaginal ultrasound-confirmed uterine niche ≥2 mm in depth. Residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width were assessed.

  • OCP group: Participants received a monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill containing 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (Technospiron® 0.03/3 mg, Technopharm, Egypt), taken for 21 days starting on day 2 of menstruation for six consecutive cycles.
  • LNG-IUS group: Participants received a 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena®, Bayer, Oy Finland), inserted under transvaginal ultrasound guidance within the first three days of menstruation for 6 months.

Both treatments were provided free of charge. Participants could switch to the alternative method upon study completion. Because of the nature of the interventions, blinding was not feasible; hence, the trial was open-label. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Participants recorded:

  • Number of days of postmenstrual/intermenstrual spotting
  • Total bleeding duration per cycle
  • Pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores (10-point visual analogue scale)
  • Sexual well-being (FSFI-6 score)
  • Treatment satisfaction (satisfied/very satisfied vs. other responses)
  • Adverse events, complications, and reasons for discontinuation (including LNG-IUS expulsion) At 6 months, transvaginal ultrasonography was repeated to assess residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • women with at least one previous cesarean section.
  • presenting with postmenstrual or intermenstrual bleeding for ≥3 consecutive cycles lasting ≥2 days, and a total bleeding duration >7 days per cycle.
  • All participants had a transvaginal ultrasound-confirmed uterine niche ≥2 mm in depth.

Exclusion criteria

  • pregnancy
  • malignancy
  • other identifiable causes of abnormal uterine bleeding
  • abnormal cervical cytology
  • cervicitis
  • pelvic inflammatory disease
  • endometrial polyps
  • uterine fibroids
  • contraindications to either combined oral contraceptive pill or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
  • desire for pregnancy
  • refusal to participate

Treatment and study plan

transvaginal ultrasonography

Diagnostic Test

At baseline and at 6 months after the start of treatment, transvaginal ultrasonography was performed to assess residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width.

monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill

Drug

Participants received a monophasic combined oral contraceptive pills containing 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (Technospiron® 0.03/3 mg, Technopharm, Egypt), starting on day 2-5 of menstruation for 21 days followed by a 7-day hormone-free interval, for six consecutive cycles.

Other names: Technospiron

52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Device

Participants received a 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena®, Bayer, Oy Finland), inserted under transvaginal ultrasound guidance within the first 5 days of menstruation for 6 months.

Other names: Mirena

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in the total number of postmenstrual and/or intermenstrual spotting days per cycle at 6 months post randomization from baseline.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months post randomization

    Participants had recorded daily bleeding data in structured, paper menstrual diaries that were prospectively given to them with proper guidance of how to fill them in a right way and then they were reviewed for completeness during follow-up visits/calls.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The total number of postmenstrual and/or intermenstrual spotting days per cycle.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Participants had recorded daily bleeding data in structured, paper menstrual diaries that were prospectively given to them with proper guidance of how to fill them in a right way and then they were reviewed for completeness during follow-up visits/calls.

  2. Total bleeding duration per cycle

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Participants had recorded daily bleeding data in structured, paper menstrual diaries that were prospectively given to them with proper guidance of how to fill them in a right way and then they were reviewed for completeness during follow-up visits/calls. It includes days of menstruation plus days of spotting

  3. Pelvic pain scores

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months

    Participants recorded this on 10-point visual analogue scale where 0 means no pain and 10 means intense pain.

  4. dysmenorrhea scores

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Participants recorded this on 10-point visual analogue scale where 0 means no pain and 10 means intense pain.

  5. Sexual function

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Assessed using the validated 6-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6). The FSFI-6 score is the sum of the participant ordinal responses to the six items; the score can range from 2 to 30. Female sexual dysfunction is diagnosed if the total score is ≤ 19 (Isidori et al., J Sex Med 2010)

  6. Treatment satisfaction

    Time frame: at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Participants recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (where 1 means very dissatisfied and 5 means very satisfied), then dichotomized for analysis as yes for "Satisfied/Very Satisfied" and no for other responses.

  7. Anatomical Niche Changes

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months post randomization

    Assessed via transvaginal ultrasonography including residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width.

  8. Adverse events

    Time frame: at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Participants reported this to the main investigator via follow up visits or telephone calls

  9. Complications

    Time frame: At 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Participants reported this to the main investigator via follow up visits or telephone calls

  10. Reasons for discontinuation

    Time frame: At 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

    Participants reported this to the main investigator via follow up visits or telephone calls

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Benha University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Oral Contraceptive Pills Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for the Management of Niche-Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Prospective Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 14, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.