Wilmer Eye Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
NCT Number: NCT00789672
This pilot study is being conducted as a prelude to a randomized trial to compare levodopa/carbidopa plus patching versus patching alone. The purpose of the pilot study is to demonstrate recruitment potential, to provide prospective data on the tolerability of levodopa as a treatment for amblyopia, to provide limited data on its safety, to provide limited data on it's efficiency, and to provide data to assist in selecting a dose to use in a subsequent phase 3 randomized trial. In addition, this study will provide the opportunity for investigators to gain experience in using levodopa prior to a randomized trial.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me8 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in both children and young and middle-aged adults. Both patching and atropine are accepted treatment modalities for the management of moderate amblyopia in children. Despite best efforts with conventional amblyopia treatment, many older children and teenagers with amblyopia fail to achieve normal visual acuity in the amblyopic eye. In a previous PEDIG study (ATS3) where children 7 to 13 years old were treated with atropine and patching, only 36% of the children with moderate amblyopia and only 23% of the children with severe amblyopia achieved 20/40 or better acuity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral levodopa 0.76 mg/kg tid with carbidopa 0.17 mg/kg tid (approximately 4.5 to 1 formulation)
2 hours daily patching
Other names: Coverlet, 3M Opticlude, Ortopad®
Time frame: 9 weeks after starting levodopa
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 being the best. Letter scores are presented as Snellen Equivalents for presentation (i.e. 20/20 includes those with letter scores between 83 and 87 letters, 20/25 includes those with letter scores between 78 to 82 letters, etc.).
Time frame: 9 weeks after starting levodopa
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 being the best.
Time frame: baseline to 9 weeks
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.
Time frame: baseline to 9 weeks
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Number of adverse events reported throughout entire study.
Time frame: 4 weeks after enrollment
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. Letter scores are presented as Snellen Equivalents for presentation (i.e. 20/20 includes those with letter scores between 83 and 87 letters, 20/25 includes those with letter scores between 78 to 82 letters, etc.).
Time frame: 4 weeks after enrollment
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best.
Time frame: 10 weeks after stopping levodopa
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. Letter scores are presented as Snellen Equivalents for presentation (i.e. 20/20 includes those with letter scores between 83 and 87 letters, 20/25 includes those with letter scores between 78 to 82 letters, etc.).
Time frame: 10 weeks after stopping levodopa
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best.
Time frame: enrollment to 4 weeks
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.
Time frame: enrollment to 4 weeks
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.
Time frame: baseline to 10 weeks after stopping levodopa
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.
Time frame: baseline to 10 weeks after stopping levodopa
Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Other
A Pilot Study to Evaluate Levodopa as Treatment for Residual Amblyopia in 8 to 17 Year Olds
Acronym: ATS14
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02983552
Amblyopia, Brain Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05732467
Amblyopia, Brain Diseases
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06372548
Adherence, Treatment, Amblyopia
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07437807
Amblyopia, Brain Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details