Cochin Hospital
Paris, 75014, France
NCT Number: NCT03385668
The purpose of this study is to determine wether pirfenidone is safe and effective in the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis with anti-myeloperoxydase (MPO) antibodies or pulmonary fibrosis with anti-MPO associated vasculitis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Paris, 75014, France
Pulmonary fibrosis can be associated with Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA) directed against MPO or with anti-MPO associated vasculitis, leading to increased disability and poor prognosis. The pathophysiology of this association remains unclear. Conventional therapies used for the treatment of vasculitis manifestations are often disappointing for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis. The main cause of death in patients with anti-MPO ANCA associated vasculitis and associated pulmonary fibrosis is the progression of pulmonary fibrosis. No treatment has demonstrated efficacy to stabilize or improve pulmonary fibrosis associated with anti-MPO associated vasculitis.
Previous studies showed that Pirfenidone improves survival and pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and that Pirfenidone treatment is safe and well tolerated in IPF. Patients with anti-MPO associated vasculitis (or anti-MPO antibodies without vasculitis) and associated pulmonary fibrosis might benefit from the use of Pirfenidone. However, the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with anti-MPO associated vasculitis and associated pulmonary fibrosis has not been evaluated. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with pulmonary fibrosis and anti-MPO ANCA associated vasculitis or anti-MPO antibodies without vasculitis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pirfenidone at a dose of 2403 mg/day for 50 weeks, after a 2 weeks period of titration (801 mg/day for one week then 1602 mg/day for one week).
Time frame: 52 weeks
Treatment efficacy at Week 52 measured by the absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) :
Time frame: 56 weeks corresponding to 28 days after the last dose of study drug
Safety parameters reported in the period from baseline to 28 days after the last dose of the study drug:
Time frame: 24 weeks
Treatment efficacy at Week 24 measured by the absolute change from baseline to Week 24 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) :
Time frame: 52 weeks
Relative change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Relative and absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Relative and absolute change from baseline to Week 24 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Relative and absolute change from baseline to Week 24 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 52 in the six minute walk test (6MWT) distance
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 24 in the six minute walk test (6MWT) distance
Time frame: 52 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 52 in the percent predicted Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (%DLCO)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 24 in the percent predicted Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (%DLCO)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Progression-free survival defined as the time to the first occurrence of any one of the following: a confirmed decrease of 10 percentage points or more in %FVC, a confirmed decrease of 15 percentage points or more in %DLCO, or death.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 52 in dyspnea as measured by the New York Heart Association classification, the modified Borg scale and by the Saint-George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
Time frame: 52 weeks
Change in Chest-CT scan abnormalities at Week 52 (evaluated after a centralized blinded review of the chest CT-scans).
Time frame: 52 weeks
Time frame: 52 weeks
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis With Anti-myeloperoxydase (MPO) Antibodies or With Anti-MPO Associated Vasculitis."
Acronym: PIRFENIVAS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04619680
COVID-19, Cicatrix
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04308681
Fibrosis, Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04170062
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00001876
Collagen Diseases, Connective Tissue Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details