Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01925534

Pilot Study of High-flow Humidified Nasal Oxygen During Breaks From Noninvasive Ventilation

The purpose of this study is to assess whether Optiflow, a high-flow humidified oxygen delivery system, is superior to standard oxygen therapy during breaks off noninvasive ventilation in patients affected by acute respiratory failure and in respiratory distress. The investigators anticipate that the Optiflow will provide oxygen more effectively, be more comfortable and permit longer breaks off NIV, shortening the total duration of NIV.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Intensive Care Unit and Intermediate Care Unit, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) provides respiratory support to many patients affected by acute respiratory failure. This treatment, compared to invasive mechanical ventilation, allows patients to take intermittent breaks during which oxygen therapy is provided through a nasal cannula or mask. During these breaks, the lack of ventilator support may predispose to respiratory distress, retention of CO2 and oxygen desaturation. Optiflow is a nasal humidified (37◦C, 44mg/L H2O) high-flow (up to 60 L/min) therapy which can provide greater support than standard oxygen therapy during the breaks from NIV.

Aim of the study is to evaluate Optiflow as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy during breaks from NIV in patients with acute respiratory failure. The investigators hypothesize tha Optiflow will reduce the total length of stay on NIV, and increase the comfort and length of the breaks. Also, the investigators anticipate that it will reduce respiratory rate, accessory muscle use and dyspnea score compared to standard oxygen therapy.

Experimental design Prospective open-label, parallel, randomized (1:1) controlled study, with a target enrollment of 70.

Study procedures Enrolled patients receiving NIV will be randomized into two arms; a treatment group which will receive Optiflow during breaks and a control arm which will receive standard oxygen therapy during breaks. In both cases, FiO2 will be titrated to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. The necessity of breaks will be determined together with the patients (talk, eat, medication, communicate with family, inability to tolerate the interface), and the need to resume NIV will be based on clinical data, such as dyspnea, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO2) and patients' desire.

Recorded data: The investigators will record demographic baseline data; Glasgow Coma Scale, respiratory and heart rate, blood pressure, dyspnea score, accessory muscle use, and comfort score at randomization, at the end of each NIV session and NIV break; the length of each NIV session and break; the medications administered and all the arterial blood gases (ABG) on a daily basis. Moreover the investigators will record the NIV parameters and inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) at each session and break.

Risks: The investigators don't anticipate any significant risks related to the study procedures and equipment. Some patients may not tolerate the Optiflow and some patients may fail NIV and require intubation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of 18 or more years of age treated with Bipap or CPAP as per hospital protocol, with an underlying clinical diagnosis of acute respiratory failure.
  • Patients that, prior to administration of NIV, had persistent respiratory acidosis with a pH <7.35 and arterial CO2 > 45 mmHg despite controlled oxygen therapy and standard medical management i.e. bronchodilators, corticosteroids and antibiotics, or
  • Patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 and respiratory rate ≥ 24.
  • Anticipated duration on NIV of at least 24 hrs

Exclusion criteria

  • Usual contraindications to NIV
  • Respiratory arrest
  • Unable to fit mask
  • Medically unstable or multiple organ failure or unstable coronary disease
  • Agitated or uncooperative
  • Unable to protect airways
  • Swallowing difficulties
  • Excessive secretions not managed by clearance techniques
  • Recent upper airway or gastro-intestinal surgery
  • Facial deformity or previous head and neck surgery
  • Undrained pneumothorax
  • NIV failure within first 2 hours (either intolerance or requirement for intubation)
  • Managed for greater than 48 hours on NIV prior to randomization
  • Disorientation, confusion, unable to rate comfort or dyspnea
  • Expected to require NIV for fewer than 24 hrs from the time of enrollment
  • Patient previously in study
  • Patients on CPAP nighttime only due to OSA

Withdrawal/Termination criteria:

  • Patients will be withdrawn from the study when NIV fails and/or the patient is intubated.

Treatment and study plan

High-flow humidified nasal oxygen delivery system

Device

During breaks from NIV oxygen will be provided through the Optiflow with FiO2 and flow-rate titrated to maintain the oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 90%.

Other names: Optiflow

Standard oxygen therapy

Device

During breaks from NIV oxygen will be provided by standard nasal cannula or mask to maintain the SpO2 above 90%.

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay on Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV)

    Time frame: Day 1-7

    The investigator will measure the total time on NIV in day(s), hours and minutes. This is done by having nursing staff note times of NIV start to finish of each session of NIV. They were added to get cumulative time.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Breaks From NIV

    Time frame: Day 4-10

    This is done by having nursing staff note times of break start (off NIV) to start of next session of NIV in minutes. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences between hypercapnic and hypoxemic patients, not observed in terms of time spent on or off NIV.

  2. Assessment of Respiratory Rate During Break

    Time frame: day 1-4

    Evaluation of respiratory rate. This was counted for a minute at bedside at start and finish of break.

  3. Patients' Comfort

    Time frame: Day 2-4

    Using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients rate how comfortable they felt on a 1 to 10 scale with 10 being most comfortable and 1 being the least comfortable.

  4. Oxygen Saturation During Breaks

    Time frame: day 1-4

    Using pulse oximetry (SpO2) at beginning and end of breaks

  5. Need for Intubation

    Time frame: Days 2-10

    Count of participants who underwent endotracheal intubation

  6. Ease of Eating

    Time frame: Day 1-4

    difficulty eating using patient rating on a visual analog scale of 0 for easy eating and 4 for difficult eating. Results tabulated as number of patients finding it easy to eat (Score of 0-1)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tufts Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Fisher and Paykel Healthcare

Registry information

Official study title

Pilot Study of Optiflow as a NIV Rest Therapy

Acronym: OPTINIV

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 19, 2013
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.