Balgrist University Hospital
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT07398534
The investigators compare negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) using the PICO 7 system versus professional wound debridement alone in adult orthopedic patients with acute, non-infected wound dehiscence or diabetic foot ulcers. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either PICO therapy (minimum 7 days, up to 42 days) or standard wound care (professional debridement without NPWT). The primary outcome is wound closure without surgical revision at Day 42. The trial is stratified for diabetic foot ulcers to enable subgroup analysis.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–120 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
Acute postoperative wound dehiscence and foot ulcers represent a frequent clinical challenge in adult orthopedic patients worldwide. According to institutional data, wound dehiscence occurs in 2-5% of elective orthopedic procedures, depending on surgery type, patient comorbidities, and obesity. Among patients with diabetes, approximately half will develop foot ulcers during their lifetime.
The management of non-infected wounds can be either surgical (revision surgery with primary closure) or conservative (professional debridement and wound care with or without negative pressure wound therapy). Despite widespread clinical experience with NPWT in orthopedic surgery, high-quality prospective evidence remains scarce. The orthopedic literature lacks adequately powered randomized controlled trials comparing NPWT to standard wound care for acute, non-infected wound dehiscence.
The investigators hypothesize that NPWT leads to superior wound closure rates (85% vs. 70%) and accelerated healing compared to professional debridement alone. The PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System creates a closed environment over the wound, evacuating exudate into an absorptive dressing while promoting secondary closure through controlled suction at -80 mmHg.
The BALPIC trial evaluates a therapeutic concept rather than comparing different NPWT devices. Infected wounds are excluded, as NPWT is conventionally avoided over purulent wounds to allow free drainage. Wound assessment is performed by specialized wound nurses using standardized measurements and photographic documentation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Professional wound debridement by specialized wound nurses, including dressing changes and local antiseptics if clinically indicated, without the use of any negative pressure device. Treatment for up to 42 days based on clinical necessity. Wound assessment weekly.
Individualized professional wound care according to hospital and Swiss nursing guidelines. The intensity of debridement, dressing type, and antiseptic use lies at the discretion of the wound nurse and will be recorded.
Time frame: Day 42 (±7 days)
Wound closure is defined as reduction of wound size by a minimum of 90% compared to baseline, without need for surgical revision. Wound failure is defined as persistent wound (less than 90% reduction) after 42 days or surgical wound revision during the study period.
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42
Time to achieve 90% wound size reduction.
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 (±2 days)
Binary assessment of wound closure at each weekly visit
Time frame: Day 42 (±7 days)
Pre-specified subgroup analysis for DFU patients.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
All adverse events during the therapy and follow-up time, including device deficiencies in the PICO arm.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
Duration of hospital stay in acute care setting.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
Total hospitalization costs.
Ilker Uckay
Other
PICO Negative Pressure for the Treatment of Uninfected Foot Ulcers and Wound Dehiscence - an Unblinded, Randomized-controlled, Superiority Trial (BALPIC Trial)
Acronym: BALPIC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03938584
Ascorbic Acid Deficiency, Avitaminosis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07003906
Hernia, Incisional Hernia
Eskilstuna, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07686913
Cesarean Section, Infections
Moreno Valley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06337292
Fracture of Tibia, Fractures, Bone
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details