LLM assistance
OtherPhysicians are assisted by an in-house large language model and are allowed to use conventional resources. Access to any other LLMs is not permitted.
NCT Number: NCT07344792
This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial that aims to evaluate whether large language model (LLM) assistance improves physicians' diagnostic performance compared with conventional assistance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing Luhe Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
The study population consists of licensed physicians who have completed at least two years of neurology training. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the LLM assistance group or the conventional assistance group. In the LLM assistance group, physicians are assisted by an in-house LLM and are allowed to use conventional resources (e.g., search engines, UpToDate, or clinical guidelines) before submitting a final diagnosis. Access to any other LLMs is not permitted. In the conventional assistance group, physicians use only conventional resources and do not have access to the in-house LLM or any other LLMs at any point during the study. The primary outcome is top-1 diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes include top-3 diagnostic accuracy, the time required to complete each case, and physicians' diagnostic confidence.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Physicians are assisted by an in-house large language model and are allowed to use conventional resources. Access to any other LLMs is not permitted.
Time frame: Baseline
Top-1 diagnosis is considered correct if the physician's final top-ranked diagnosis matches the reference diagnosis or a clinically similar diagnosis judged as equivalent by neurologists.
Time frame: Baseline
Top-3 diagnosis is considered correct if the reference diagnosis or a clinically similar diagnosis judged as equivalent by neurologists appears among the physician's top three final diagnoses.
Time frame: Baseline
Time participants spend per case.
Time frame: Baseline
Physicians' diagnostic confidence will be measured using a five-point Likert scale (1=very unsure, 5=very sure).
Capital Medical University
Other
Physician Diagnosis of Neurologic Cases Assisted by Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07647159
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07508670
Brain Diseases, Brain Ischemia
Cork, Ireland
View Trial DetailsNCT06779292
Disease Attributes, Emergencies
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06539260
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Suzhou, Anhui, China
View Trial Details