Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03978845

Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury

The purpose of this single-centered, proof of concept study is to determine whether it is feasible to perform a phrenic nerve block to reduce diaphragm electrical activity and, therefore, inspiratory effort and if such block reduces self-inflicted lung injury on patients under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing. Ten patients will be monitored with electrical impedance tomography, NAVA catheter, and esophageal balloon. Using a nerve stimulator and an ultrasound, we will identify the phrenic nerve on its cervical portion bilaterally and administer perineural low-dose lidocaine. Diaphragm electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and data on ventilation distribution will be continuously collected. The study will be over once the patient presents the same diaphragm electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo

São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil

About this study

The use of protective mechanical ventilation has improved prognosis on patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. The association of neuromuscular blockade in the first 48-72h has additionally contributed to a higher survival rate. Such improvement may be due to the reduction of transpulmonary pressures caused by the patient's inspiratory effort. To achieve appropriate neuromuscular blockade, highes doses of both neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives are required. Therefore, such a strategy usually causes muscular atrophy, including the diaphragm.

Because of the augmented neural drive of such patients, exacerbated by inflammation and pulmonary edema, the consequent high tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure cannot be reduced by the newest sedatives. In fact, some of these sedatives may even deteriorate ventilatory dyssynchrony. Our intention is to verify a novel approach: whether is possible to reduce the inspiratory effort of patients without the use of systemic neuromuscular blocking agents.

Our objective in this proof of concept study is to determine the feasibility the use of phrenic nerve blockade to decrease transpulmonary pressure and tidal volume, as well as quantify its effects on esophageal pressure, diaphragmatic electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and ventilation distribution in patients on spontaneous breathing. It is expected that such intervention will reduce diaphragm electrical activity, leading to lower transpulmonary pressure, tidal volume and driving pressures.

All patients will be submitted to the same intervention. Respiratory mechanics, ventilation distribution, diaphragm electrical activity, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and peripheral saturation will be collected throughout the study. Once the patient presents the same diaphragmatic electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block, the study will be over.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 17 years-old;
  • Under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing, capable of triggering the ventilator with P/F < 300;
  • Tidal volume > 10ml/kg with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O OR driving pressure > 15 cm H2O with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of neuromuscular blocking agents less than 3h;
  • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) > 0;
  • Arterial pH < 7.25;
  • Hemodynamically unstable or with increasing doses of vasopressors in the last 2h;
  • Intracranial hypertension;
  • Thoracic or abdominal tubes;
  • Any neuromuscular disease;
  • Spinal injury;
  • Ascitis;
  • Thoracic burn injury;
  • Tetanus;
  • Pregnancy.

Treatment and study plan

Lidocaine

Drug

Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.

Other names: Local anesthetic

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction of tidal volume or transpulmonary pressure

    Time frame: 20 minutes

    Tidal volume or transpulmonary pressure measured using EIT, Servo-I and an esophageal balloon

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction of the inspiratory effort

    Time frame: 20 minutes - 3 hours

    Diaphragm electrical activity using NAVA

  2. Consequences on mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 20 minutes - 3 hours

    Tidal volume, pendellfut and asynchronies measured by EIT

  3. Time to complete weaning of the blockade

    Time frame: 30 minutes - 3 hours

    Patients will be monitored until full recover of inspiratory effort or diaphragm electrical activity

  4. Reduction of the inspiratory effort

    Time frame: 20 minutes - 3 hours

    Esophageal pressure using an esophageal catheter

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility of Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury in ARF Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation on Spontaneous Breathing

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 7, 2019
Registry last updated
Sep 30, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.