UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
NCT Number: NCT02970162
This study evaluates the effect of withdrawing amifampridine phosphate treatment from patients with LEMS. One half of the patients will continue to receive amifampridine phosphate and the other half will receive placebo, during this double-blind study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
This was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, withdrawal study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amifampridine phosphate in patients diagnosed with LEMS. The study was planned to include approximately 28 male and female patients.
Prior to the study, patients were receiving unblinded treatment in the expanded access program (EAP-001). Patients had to be on a stable dose and frequency of amifampridine phosphate for at least 1 week prior to randomization into LMS-003. Screening and randomization (Day 0) may have been into a single visit.
Patients who met eligibility criteria were randomized 1:1 to amifampridine phosphate (at the patient's optimal dose) or placebo on Day 0.
Baseline assessments were obtained on Study Day 0, while the patient has been on open-label amifampridine phosphate and in relationship to the usual dosing schedule. Patients took blinded study medication on Day 1 through Day 3. On Day 4, a dose of blinded study medication was administered by the site study personnel. This was the same medication that the patient took on Day 1 through Day 3. The assessments listed below were performed following either the second, third, or fourth dose of medication taken on Day 4, and this should be the same dose after which Day 0 assessments were performed. For example, if the patient took their second dose of amifampridine in the clinic on Day 0 and had assessments started 40 minutes later, then on Day 4, that patient should be assessed after taking their second dose of investigational product (IP).
Beginning with the next dose after all Day 0 baseline assessments were completed, the patient received IP through Day 4, with a clinic visit on the last day (Day 4) for assessments.
The planned duration of participation for each patient was up to 12 days, including screening (up to 7 days), Day 0 assessments and randomization, and IP administration (Day 1 through Day 4).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: change from baseline in QMG score at end of day 4
The QMG is a physician-rated test including 13 assessments such as facial strength, swallowing, grip strength, and duration of time that limbs can be maintained in outstretched positions. Each assessment is graded as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe), for a total range of 0-39. A higher total score indicates a worse outcome.
Time frame: change from baseline in SGI score at end of day 4
The SGI is a 7-point scale on which the patient rates their global impression of the effects of a study treatment (1=terrible to 7=delighted). The SGI was assessed by the patient or the patient's parent/guardian/caregiver if the patient was unable to complete the SGI. The SGI has demonstrated concordance with the physician's assessment of improvement.
Time frame: change from baseline in CGI-I score at end of day 4
The CGI-I captures the Investigator's global impression of the patient's improvement or worsening from baseline status. The 7-point scale is scored by the Investigator based on changes in symptoms, behavior, and functional abilities. Each symptom is rated as 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), or 7 (very much worse). The total score can range from 0 to 49. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Time frame: change from baseline in 3TUG at end of day 4
The 3TUG is a functional mobility test that requires a patient to stand up from a straight-backed armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down in the chair. A modification of this is where the individual performs the test 3 times without pause, and the measurement is the average time required to complete each of the 3 repetitions. Based upon literature reports that a significant change in gait for a similar walk-test is an increase in time of more than 20%, this has been incorporated into the endpoint.
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Industry
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amifampridine Phosphate in Patients With Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05408702
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01511978
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00004832
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
View Trial DetailsNCT07478172
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Autoimmune Diseases
Columbia, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details