Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02347176

Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tralokinumab in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in adults with atopic dermatitis

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Research Site, East Melbourne, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Physician diagnosis of atopic dermatitis for greater than (>) 1 year
  • Atopic dermatitis involvement of greater than or equal to (>=) 10 percent (%) body surface area
  • EASI score of >= 12
  • SCORAD of >= 25
  • IGA score of >= 3
  • Effective birth control in line with protocol details

Exclusion criteria

  • History of anaphylaxis following any biologic therapy
  • Hepatitis B, C or human immunodeficiency virus
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • History of cancer
  • Previous receipt of tralokinumab

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Other

Subcutaneous injection with placebo

Tralokinumab Dose 1

Biological

Subcutaneous injection with tralokinumab

Tralokinumab Dose 2

Biological

Subcutaneous injection with tralokinumab

Tralokinumab Dose 3

Biological

Subcutaneous injection with tralokinumab

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

    EASI evaluates 4 natural anatomical regions for severity and extent of key disease signs and focuses on the key acute and chronic signs of inflammation (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification). The maximum total score is 72, with higher values indicating more severe disease. The data presented here is Adjusted mean change after excluding the data from participants who took prohibited medications.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and at Least a 2-Grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    The IGA allows investigators to assess overall disease severity at one given time point and consists of a 6-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease, and 5 = very severe disease). A participant has IGA response if they achieve a score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    Time frame: From Study Drug Administration (Day 1) to Week 22

    An adverse event (AE) present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of investigational product or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug until Week 22. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening situation (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a participant who received Tralokinumab. Treatment-emergent adverse events between administration of investigational product and Week 22 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

  2. Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Examination Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: From Study Drug Administration (Day 1) to Week 22

    Vital sign parameters included blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate, and respiratory rate. TEAEs were present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug until Week 22.

  3. Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: From Study Drug Administration (Day 1) to Week 22

    An abnormal laboratory finding which required an action or intervention by the investigator, or a finding judged by the investigator to represent a change beyond the range of normal physiologic fluctuation were reported as an adverse event. Treatment-emergent adverse events between administration of investigational product and Week 22 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Laboratory evaluations (haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis) of blood and urine samples were performed.

  4. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: From Study Drug Administration (Day 1) to Week 22

    AEs observed in participants with clinically significant ECG abnormalities were assessed. ECG parameters included heart rate, RR, PR, QRS and QT intervals. Treatment-emergent adverse events between administration of investigational product and Week 22 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

  5. Adjusted Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    EASI50 responder is defined as a participant who achieves at least a 50% reduction in EASI score from baseline. Data from participants who took prohibited medications were excluded from this analysis and a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was used.

  6. Absolute Change From Baseline in Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

    The SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity (that is, extent, intensity) of atopic dermatitis (AD). The tool evaluates the extent and intensity of the AD lesions, along with participant symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease. The data presented here is Adjusted mean change after excluding the data from participants who took prohibited medications.

  7. Adjusted Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    SCORAD 50 responder is defined as a participant who achieves at least a 50% reduction in SCORAD score from baseline. Data from participants who took prohibited medications were excluded from this analysis and a LOCF analysis was used.

  8. Change From Baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (7-day Mean Score) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

    Pruritus assessed using an NRS (0 - 10) with 0= no itch and 10= worst imaginable itch. Daily pruritus assessments were summarized as weekly peak score and a change from baseline in weekly peak score was calculated. The data presented here is Adjusted mean change after excluding the data from participants who took prohibited medications.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

MedImmune LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tralokinumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Acronym: D2213C00001

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jan 27, 2015
Registry last updated
May 23, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.