Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05846841

Personalized Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care (MOTIVATE)

This study examines the application of precision treatment intervention for smoking cessation from both the clinician perspective and patient perspective, and compares it to usual care on tobacco treatment in the primary care setting. The precision treatment intervention includes personalized tobacco treatment recommendations using the patient's clinical, genetic, and biomarker information. This approach may increase effectiveness and adherence for the patient, and increase the clinician's likelihood of prescribing.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Alex Ramsey, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

314-362-5370

Alex Ramsey, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Esther Lu, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Hilary Tindle, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Laura Bierut, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Li-Shiun Chen, ScD, MD, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

314-362-3932

Li-Shiun Chen, ScD, MD, MPH

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rachel Tyndale, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Robert Schnoll, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Timothy Baker, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

The overarching goal of this study is to test the impact of a multilevel precision treatment intervention aiming to address gaps in clinician and patient uptake of tobacco treatment and overall treatment effectiveness. This study builds on evidence that (1) genetic and metabolic factors may inform precision tobacco treatment and (2) increasingly high demand for precision treatment, in particular, may signal its potential to activate behavior change. The multilevel precision treatment intervention to be tested--PrecisionTx-- provides the opportunity to present personalized risk, benefit, and treatment recommendation to increase clinician ordering, patient uptake, and overall effectiveness of tobacco treatment. This study aims to understand the relative benefit of precision treatment over usual care and associated mechanistic and implementation outcomes. Therefore, the investigators propose a 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial of 50 clinicians and 800 screen-eligible patients (~16 per clinician) from diverse primary care settings. Clinicians and patients will be randomized with 1:1 allocation to usual care (UC) vs. precision treatment (PT) to evaluate the effect of precision treatment on smoking cessation success. In Aim 1, the investigators will test the effect of PT on clinician prescribing (or patient receipt of medication when prescription is not needed) and patient use of medication for smoking cessation. The investigators hypothesize that patient receipt of tobacco treatment medication for smoking cessation at 6 months post-intervention will be higher in PT vs UC. The investigators also hypothesize that patient use of cessation medication at 6 months post-intervention will be higher in PT vs. UC. In Aim 2, the investigators will test the effect of PT on patient smoking abstinence. The investigators hypothesize that patient bioverified smoking abstinence at 6 months will be higher in PT vs. UC. In Aim 3, the investigators will examine mechanisms of behavior change and implementation outcomes. The investigators will evaluate putative mechanisms for PT (e.g., outcome expectancy and withdrawal suppression). The investigators will conduct assessments at baseline, intervention, and 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month post-intervention follow-ups.

Primary outcomes include patient receipt of tobacco treatment, patient use of tobacco treatment, and patient smoking abstinence. Secondary outcomes include patient receipt of recommended medication, patient medication adherence, and additional patient smoking cessation outcomes. Mechanistic outcomes include clinician level (perceived benefit, outcome expectancy), clinician-patient interaction (self-efficacy), patient-level (perceived risk, outcome expectancy, withdrawal suppression, adverse events). Implementation outcomes will be evaluated based on the RE-AIM framework. The study is an innovative paradigm shift from a traditional treatment model to precision treatment that includes both metabolic and genetic markers to motivate and guide tobacco treatment for both clinicians and patients, integrated within primary care.

Smoking is a leading cause of premature death, causing more than half of all cancer deaths. However, tobacco treatment is often not provided and is not highly effective in primary care. New evidence suggests that a precision treatment approach to motivate and guide treatment based on personal genetic and metabolic markers could improve treatment uptake and quit success. This study will test the impact of a multilevel precision treatment intervention on improving tobacco treatment and health outcomes in primary care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Eligibility Criteria for Primary and Specialty Care Clinicians

  • Clinician from participating clinic
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Can speak and understand English

Eligibility Criteria for Primary Care and Specialty Patients

Inclusion:

  • Patient at participating clinic
  • Age 18 years or older, inclusive
  • Current smoking (cigarettes per day >=5)
  • Can speak and understand English
  • Willing to consider medication to help reduce craving or smoking such as nicotine patch, lozenge, or varenicline

Exclusion:

  • Active use of smoking cessation medication (within the past 30 days)
  • Receipt of smoking cessation medication or prescription for smoking cessation medication (within the past 30 days)
  • Having a contraindication for cNRT or varenicline (allergic reactions, current cardiac problems, pregnancy)

Treatment and study plan

Precision treatment

Behavioral

Precision treatment will be informed by practice guidelines (standard of care, brief advice, and guideline awareness), plus patient-specific risk feedback and personalized tobacco treatment recommendations using patients' clinical, genetic, and biomarker information.

Usual Care

Behavioral

Usual care will be informed by practice guidelines (standard of care, brief advice, and guideline awareness).

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient receipt of tobacco treatment medication for smoking cessation

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    This will be quantified by the proportion of enrolled patients who receive cessation medication.

  2. Patient use of cessation medication

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    This will be quantified by the proportion of patients taking any cessation medication from time of enrollment through 6 months post-intervention.

  3. Patient smoking abstinence

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    This will be quantified by the proportion of smokers with bioverified point-prevalent abstinence at 6 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient receipt of recommended tobacco treatment

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    This will be quantified by the proportion of enrolled patients who received recommended cessation medication.

  2. Patient medication adherence

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    This will be quantified by the proportion of medication taken among medication prescribed.

  3. Patient smoking abstinence among treated

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    This will be quantified by the proportion of smokers with bioverified point-prevalence abstinence among those receiving cessation medication.

  4. Abstinence Outcomes Across Multiple Time Points

    Time frame: From intervention through 12 months post-intervention

    The outcome measures abstinence (self-reported no smoking (not even a puff of a cigarette) for at least 7 days prior to the assessment) over these time points.

  5. Smoking quantity across multiple time points

    Time frame: From intervention through 12 months post-intervention

    The outcome measures smoking quantity (self-reported average cigarettes smoked per day for the past 30 days prior to the assessment) over these time points.

  6. Quit attempts

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-intervention

    This outcome measures the number of quit attempts in the past 30 days prior to the assessment over these time points.

Other outcomes

  1. Perceived benefits (Clinician)

    Time frame: Exit interview [after last patient is enrolled per clinician at the time of the last intervention (approximately 3 years)]

    Clinicians' perceived importance and benefits of patients receiving smoking cessation medications will be assessed using a modified version of the Beliefs and Attitudes About Bupropion Scale.

  2. Outcome expectancies (Clinician)

    Time frame: Exit interview [after last patient is enrolled per clinician at the time of the last intervention (approximately 3 years)]

    Clinicians' outcome expectancies regarding tobacco treatment will be assessed using a modified version of the Stanford Expectation of Treatment Scale.

  3. Self-efficacy regarding patient-clinician interaction (Clinician)

    Time frame: Exit interview [after last patient is enrolled per clinician at the time of the last intervention (approximately 3 years)]

    Clinicians' perceived self-efficacy regarding patient-clinician communication will be assessed using a modified version of the Communication Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale.

  4. Self-efficacy regarding patient-clinician interaction (Patient)

    Time frame: From intervention through 12 months post-intervention

    Patients' perceived self-efficacy regarding patient-clinician communication will be assessed using a modified version of the Communication Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale.

  5. Perceived risk (Patient)

    Time frame: From baseline through 12 months post-intervention

    Patients' perceived smoking-related disease risks will be assessed using a modified version of the Perceived Susceptibility and Severity Scale.

  6. Outcome expectancies (Patient)

    Time frame: From baseline through 12 months post-intervention

    Patients' outcome expectancies regarding tobacco treatment will be assessed using a modified version of the Stanford Expectation of Treatment Scale.

  7. Withdrawal

    Time frame: From baseline through 12 months post-intervention

    Withdrawal severity is assessed by Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS).

  8. Side Effects

    Time frame: From baseline through 12 months post-intervention

    All reported side effects will be summarized and presented for the study. In addition, the investigators will further identify a pre-specified set of key side effects as being related to drug agonist effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, racing heart, headache, and sleep disturbance). These will be analyzed as the rate of occurrence during the period of cessation medication use, if applicable.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alex Ramsey, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

314-362-5370

Li-Shiun Chen, ScD, MD, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

314-362-3932

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Registry information

Official study title

A Multilevel Intervention to Personalize and Improve Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care (MOTIVATE)

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 6, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.