Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06947512

Personalization of Visual Characters and Text-to-Speech (TTS) to Support Learning in Students With Reading Difficulties

Previous research has shown the importance of font type, size and spacing to facilitate text reading in dyslexia. A special automatized procedure was designed to select the most favorable parameters for both text visualization and text-to-speech (TTS) conversion to be used by students with reading difficulties. The validation of its outcomes will be carried out through a systematic comparison of the use of the personalized versus standard fonts and voices in reading and writing tests.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

7 year–15 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IRCCS E. Medea, polo di Bosisio Parini, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Seleggo is a free compensatory tool for dyslexic students. It is an online platform where school textbooks are transcribed and visualized on the screen in portable format (PDF) versions, characterized by special attention to graphical features and readability, and can be listened to via TTS technology. Special functions such as karaoke modality, conceptual maps building software, summary creation, verbal and visual definition search and the possibility to record and retrieve one's own notes and sketches are also provided. Each student with Specific learning Disorder (SLD) has a personal library and can choose the parameters for text visualization to facilitate reading, modifying the display of the text, choosing font, size and spacing, as well as TTS parameters, such as speed and pitch.

The availability of many options for text visualization and TTS, however, can be advantageous only as far as the students are able to choose and use parameters that objectively facilitate their reading and comprehension. Since the analysis of the literature suggests that subjective choices may be misleading and that general recommendations may not fit the individual's needs, we decided to build an automatized, as objective as possible procedure to help the students find the combination of parameters that is most likely to facilitate them in reading and studying. This procedure, composed by an initial, gross-grained subjective procedure and followed by a thorough, systematic analysis of reading and comprehension performance, was named "Seleggo test" to match the compensatory tool it was meant to complement.

The present study aims to assess the actual advantage of personalized parameter selection through the "Seleggo Test" procedure in supporting reading compared to the use of standard parameters. The working hypothesis is that children with reading disorders would benefit from personalized text features and TTS.

The recruitment of participants will take place in schools. It is foreseen that 30 participants are recruited for each of the three groups: typically Developing children (TD), Developmental Dyslexia (DD) and Special Educational Needs (SEN) - with reading difficulties).

Additional children will be recruited form patients with DD at Scientific Institute (IRCCS) E. Medea, if necessary to reach the expected number. Children will attend the third grade of primary school to the third grade of middle school (7 to 15 years old).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(for TD group):

  • age 7-15 years
  • no history of reading difficulties
  • attends school in Italy

Exclusion criteria

(for TD group):

  • special educational needs or diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders

Inclusion criteria

(for DD group):

  • age 7-15 years
  • diagnosis of Developmental Dyslexia or Specific Reading Disorder
  • Attends school in Italy

Exclusion criteria

(for DD group):

  • diagnosis of Intellectual Disability

Inclusion criteria

(for SEN group):

  • age 7-15 years
  • reported by school to have significant difficulties in reading and writing
  • Attends school in Italy (at least 6 months continued schooling and exposure to the Italian language)

Exclusion criteria

(for SEN group):

  • diagnosis of Intellectual Disability

Treatment and study plan

Seleggo Test

Device

Seleggo Test is a computerized procedure to identify the personalized visual and auditory parameters facilitating reading and writing for each participant. By applying these parameters to the visualization and to the TTS software during reading of school texts, the participants are expected to be facilitated in reading and understanding the text.

Primary outcomes

  1. Reading facilitation (speed), i.e. the advantage in reading performance (speed) produced by personalized parameters as compared to standard parameters

    Time frame: Intervention will take place during initial assessment and will last about 1,5 hours (comparison between personalized and standard parameters during the same assessment session)

    difference between reading speed (seconds to read the text displayed by the software) with personalized and with standard visual parameters

  2. Reading facilitation (accuracy), i.e. the advantage in reading performance (accuracy) produced by personalized parameters as compared to standard parameters

    Time frame: Intervention will take place during initial assessment and will last about 1,5 hours (comparison between personalized and standard parameters during the same assessment session)

    difference between reading accuracy (number of errors in reading the text displayed by the software) with personalized and with standard visual parameters

  3. Comprehension facilitation, i.e. the advantage in auditory comprehension performance produced by personalized TTS parameters as compared to standard parameters

    Time frame: Intervention will take place during initial assessment and will last about 1,5 hours (comparison between personalized and standard parameters during the same assessment session)

    difference between writing accuracy (number of errors in writing a pre-defined list of nonwords) for stimuli dictated with personalized and with standard auditory parameters in the TTS device

Secondary outcomes

  1. possibility to discriminate TD students' reading speed from that of students with DD and SEN

    Time frame: about 10 months

    difference (ANOVAs) in performance (in terms of speed, expressed in seconds per syllable) on the reading tests delivered by the software, between the three groups (TD, DD and SEN)

  2. possibility to discriminate TD students's reading accuracy from that of students with DD and SEN

    Time frame: about 10 months

    difference (ANOVAs) in performance (in terms of accuracy, expressed in number of errors) on the reading tests delivered by the software, between the three groups (TD, DD and SEN)

  3. possibility to discriminate TD students' writing accuracy from that of students with DD and SEN

    Time frame: about 10 months

    difference (ANOVAs) in performance (in terms of accuracy, expressed in number of errors) on the writing tests delivered by the software, between the three groups (TD, DD and SEN)

  4. validity and reliability values for the reading speed measures collected by the software

    Time frame: about 10 months

    Pearson's correlations between the speed measures collected during the test and the speed measures obtained on standardized reading tests (MT test of reading speed and accuracy and Assessment Battery for Developmental Reading and Spelling Disorders).

  5. validity and reliability values for the reading accuracy measures collected by the software

    Time frame: about 10 months

    Pearson's correlations between the reading accuracy measures collected during the test and the accuracy measures obtained on standardized reading tests (MT test of reading speed and accuracy and Assessment Battery for Developmental Reading and Spelling Disorders).

  6. validity and reliability values for the writing accuracy measures collected by the software

    Time frame: about 10 months

    Pearson's correlations between the writing accuracy measures collected during the test and the accuracy measures obtained on standardized writing tests (Assessment Battery for Developmental Reading and Spelling Disorders).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Maria Luisa Lorusso, Ph.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

031-877592

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of the Personalization of Visual Parameters and Text-to-Speech to Improve Reading Speed, Accuracy and Comprehension in Students With Learning Disorders

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Apr 27, 2025
Registry last updated
May 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.