PEEP 5 mbar
ProcedurePositiv-End-Expiratory Pressure
NCT Number: NCT06836830
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major cause of mortality, with low survival probabilities to hospital discharge. Despite the frequent use of airway management and mechanical ventilation during resuscitation, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal ventilation strategy to improve oxygen delivery and patient outcomes. The present study aims to investigate the effects of positive-end-expiratory-pressure (PEEP) set at 5 mbar compared to zero-end-expiratory-pressure (ZEEP) on the return of spontaneous-circulation (ROSC) in adult patients with OHCA.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Emergency Medical Services, Gütersloh, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
This is a prospective, multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted across emergency medical services (EMS) in the regions of Guetersloh, Minden-Luebbecke and Osnabrueck. Adult patients (>= 18 years) with OHCA who are undergoing mechanical ventilation through an airway device will be enrolled. The clusters (regional district) will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive ventilation with PEEP set at 5 mbar (intervention group), while the other group will receive ventilation with ZEEP (control group). The study's primary endpoint is the rate of ROSC. Secondary endpoints include rate of re-arrest, death during pre-hospital care phase, hospital admission during ongoing resuscitation, hospital admission with spontaneous circulation, peripheral oxygen saturation and end tidal CO2 at hospital admission.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Positiv-End-Expiratory Pressure
Zero-End-Expiratory Pressure
Time frame: During or after resuscitation
The primary outcome is the ROSC, defined according to the Utstein template by the presence of a palpable pulse during or after resuscitation. This will be measured as a binary outcome (palpable pulse, yes or no).
Time frame: Upon hospital admission
Any need for chest compressions after ROSC (yes vs. no)
Time frame: Upon hospital admission
Any death during pre-hospital care phase (yes vs. no)
Time frame: at hospital admission
Need for chest-compressions at hospital admission (yes vs. no)
Time frame: at hospital admission
Hospital admission with spontaneous circulation without need for chest compressions (yes vs. no)
Time frame: at hospital admission
SpO2 at hospital admission (%)
Time frame: at hospital admission
FiO2 at hospital admission (%)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Gerrit Jansen, PD Dr. med.
CONTACT
Jochen Hinkelbein, Prof. Dr. med.
CONTACT
Muehlenkreiskliniken, MKK
Other
Peri-Arrest Ventilation With Positive End-Expiratory-Pressure vs. Zero End-Expiratory-Pressure in Out-of-Hospital-Cardiac-Arrest
Acronym: PerAVent
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06286917
ALS, Chronic Respiratory Failure
Tampere, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT07198880
BiPAP, COPD
View Trial DetailsNCT05903378
Ventilation Therapy
Boulogne-Billancourt, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06809309
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiovascular Diseases
Aabenraa, Denmark
View Trial Details