Department of emergency medicine, Linköping University Hospital, Region Östergötland, Linköping
Linköping, Sweden, 58225
NCT Number: NCT06621290
An increasingly common subject of interest among emergency care research is frailty, which is commonly described as a decline in several inter-related physiological systems, in addition to an increased vulnerability to stressors. To increase emergency care staffs ability to intervene appropriately in patients who need interventions to improve their outcomes, geriatric emergency care guidelines include recommendations to identify frailty during the emergency department (ED) visit. However, the patients´ experience of frailty assessment in general is sparsely investigated, and such studies within the ED context are even more limited.
It is conceivable that the patients experience of a frailty assessment may differ depending on several different factors, including which assessment tool is used.
A large number of assessment tools have been developed to help identify frailty, of which the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is one of the most widely used. The CFS has been validated for persons ≥65 years of age and has been evaluated for validity, reliability and feasibility in an ED-setting. The CFS consists of pictograms combined with clinical descriptions of a persons level of functioning in daily life and cognitive status. Hence, to determine the CFS-score, the healthcare staff needs to ask the patient about their physical activity and function level regarding instrumental and personal activities of daily living (eg, banking, shopping, medication management, housekeeping, dressing and hygiene matters).
Since the different questions are often not directly linked to the patients acute illness, but touch on personal subjects like the persons abilities and life situation, it is desirable to understand the patients experience of such an assessment in order to optimise the approach from a patient perspective. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that focus on how patients experience being assessed with CFS during their ED-visit.
The aim of this study is therefore to inform a model to guide emergency department staff in assessing frailty with CFS, directed by the perspective from patients along the frailty trajectory. Specifically, our question is:
- How do older ED-patients experience the frailty assessment with the CFS?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Linköping, Sweden, 58225
With the nature of qualitative data, a definitive sample size cannot be determined in advance. An estimate is that data will need to be collected for 15-25 patients. The analysis is planned to start in parallel with the data collection, and when no further significant findings are made during the progress of the analysis, the data collection will end. To ensure study quality, a reflexive approach and data-/researcher triangulation will be applyed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Semi-structured interviews on ED-patients experiences of frailty assessment with the CFS
Other names: Qualitative research
Time frame: immediately after the CFS-assessment
Qualitative method, conducted in the form of video recordings of the CFS-assessments and individual semi-structured interviews. The planned method of analysis is Thematic Analysis.
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Other
Understanding the Patient Experience of Geriatric Assessment in the Emergency Department
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01833078
Frailty in Aging
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06870149
Frail Older Adults, Frailty
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05963360
Frailty in Aging, Older People
Southampton, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07074899
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Lima, Lima Province, Peru
View Trial Details