Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary Disease and Vascular Medicine
Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
NCT Number: NCT05865938
Comparsion of the current two available TEER systems, the MitraClip with the PASCAL repair system in terms of their effectiveness and safety in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) and in patients with functional regurgitation (FMR), who were referred for an interventional therapy by the heart team due to a high surgical risk profile.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
A prospective single-center, open-label study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter mitral valve repair of the mitral valve (M-TEER) using the Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System compared to using the Abbott MitraClip in patients with severe and symptomatic degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). The type of device system used was not randomized but was determined by the operational structuring of our mitral valve program such that patients were scheduled for the next available implantation date with weekly alternating time slots for MitraClip device and PASCAL device. Treating physicians had no influence on scheduling or system selection.
Follow-up examinations will be performed one month and one year after the procedure with assessment of echocardiographic and functional status based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade. Patient characteristics, baseline data, and data related to the procedure were assessed using a registry, medical records and the procedure protocols.
This study is a subproject of the MitraClip® Registry (NCT02033811)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
transcatheter mitral valve repair of the mitral valve (M-TEER) using the Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System or the Abbott MitraClip in patients with severe and symptomatic degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).
The type of device system used was not randomized but was determined by the operational structuring of the mitral valve program such that patients were scheduled for the next available implantation date with weekly alternating time slots for MitraClip device and PASCAL device.
Time frame: one month after implantation
as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)
Time frame: one year after implantation
Time frame: one month and one year after implantation
measured by echocardiography
Time frame: one month and one year after implantation
according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
Other
PASCAL vs. MitralClip for Mitral Valve Transchatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: A Prospective, Single-center, Open-label Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06814210
Cardiovascular Diseases, Degenerative Mitral Valve Regurgitation
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00800046
Cardiovascular Diseases, Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT03433274
Cardiovascular Diseases, Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03706833
Cardiovascular Diseases, Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details