Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04452201

Parent Communication for Feeding an Infant With a Heart Defect

The purpose of this study is to pilot test an innovative, guided participation (GP) intervention to help parents develop competencies in communication for parenting an infant with a complex congenital heart defect (CCHD) through the first six months of age.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

American Family Children's Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Study aims are to:

  • Investigate the intervention feasibility (capability of being done, carried out, and objectives accomplished), accessibility, acceptability, usefulness, safety, and cost.
  • Explore the effect of the GP intervention on outcomes within and between groups and over time.

Sample and Groups:

Parents will be recruited to the study either following a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of a complex congenital heart defect. 36 families will be recruited and then computer randomized to either the GP or usual care (UC) groups in a 2:1 ratio, with a goal of 30 families completing the study (20 GP families, 10, UC families). Six of the families will be enrolled at American Family Children's Hospital (Madison, WI) (AFCH), with the rest enrolled at CHW. Each participating parent couple will receive an electronic tablet that will be the couple's to keep. A library of published materials from the UW-Health Sciences Library about infant care has been installed on the Tablets for both groups.

GP couples' participation together in development of communication competencies in the context of infant care will be supported by a handbook that is installed on the tablet as well as being given to parents in hard copy, and by telephone guidance, structured for collaboration with the nurse/research assistant beginning at approximately 2 weeks of age. Two face-to-face sessions are expected prior to hospital discharge, followed by 5 or 6 monthly phone sessions. If the baby is inpatient at the time an intervention session is to take place, the session may be done face-to-face, if more convenient than a phone session for the parents.

For both GP and UC groups, data will be collected prior to the infant's discharge from the hospital and at 2 and 6 months after the infant's birth. Two severity of infant illness scores will be computed by a pediatric cardiologist, the first for the neonatal period and the second when the infant is 6 months old. The data collections plus a monthly phone call to learn about infant and family changes make the UC group an attention control group.

A survey regarding use of the materials supplied as part of the study and the couple's communication will be collected at 4 time points from parents in both groups. Baseline and soon after the baby begins oral feeding (up to to one week, both before hospital discharge) and, 2 months and 6 months (both at home, 6 months is end of study).

Each data collection visit will include:

  • self-report surveys
  • assessment of heart-rate variability (HRV)
  • an initial 20-minute interview about what the parents are experiencing and working on as parents, how they are managing stressors, and how caregiving is going
  • an infant feeding of usual length
  • an approximately 30-minute interview concerning the parents' internal working model of feeding, parenting communication and co-parenting pattern
  • a couple problem-solving session with two 7-minute problems, each followed by independent evaluation of the problem session by each parent
  • following each visit, data will be obtained from the infant's electronic health record
  • anthropometric data (weight, length, head circumference)
  • illness and treatments
  • medical procedures
  • neurodevelopmental progress

The feeding and the problem solving will be video recorded for in-laboratory coding.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parent couples will be married or partnered (living together),
  • English speaking and reading
  • Infants will have a CCHD diagnosed by the first week of life, requiring palliative or reparative surgery within the baby's first year

Exclusion criteria

  • Families will be excluded if either parent is not willing to participate, or is unable to participate due to a communication barrier
  • Families will be excluded if either parent is known to have a mental illness that interferes with day-to-day functions or a substance use problem

Treatment and study plan

Guided Participation

Behavioral

GP couples' participation together in development of communication competencies in the context of infant care will be supported by a handbook and telephone guidance structured for collaboration with the nurse/research assistant beginning at approximately 2 weeks of age. Two face-to-face sessions are expected prior to hospital discharge, followed by 5 or 6 monthly phone sessions. If the baby is inpatient at the time an intervention session is to take place, the session may be done face-to-face, if more convenient than a phone session for the parents.

Other names: GP

Primary outcomes

  1. Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales (IFIRS) scores to measure family dynamics

    Time frame: month 2

    The IFIRS is an Observational macrocoding system where recorded interviews are coded and each code is given a single score upon review. Scores are 1-9 where 1 indicates that the behavior did not occur and 9 indicates the behavior almost always occurs. Families were scored on the following codes at 2 and 6 months: goal setting, problem solving, negotiating issues, and emotion regulating during problem solving.

  2. Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales (IFIRS) scores to measure family dynamics

    Time frame: month 6

    The IFIRS is an Observational macrocoding system where recorded interviews are coded and each code is given a single score upon review. Scores are 1-9 where 1 indicates that the behavior did not occur and 9 indicates the behavior almost always occurs. Families were scored on the following codes at 2 and 6 months: goal setting, problem solving, negotiating issues, and emotion regulating during problem solving.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (ERA) Scores

    Time frame: up to one week

    The ERA is an observational measure of parental mental attunement and sensitivity and responsiveness to the infant and of the infant's responsive and regulated behavior during feeding. The mean score for each of the six subscale scores are reported: Parental Positive Affective Involvement, sensitivity, & Responsiveness; Parental Negative Affect and behavior (a higher score indicates less of the parental negative affect and behavior); Infant Positive Affect & Communicative and Social Skills; Infant Dysregulation and Irritability; Dyadic Mutuality and Reciprocity; Dyadic Tension. Each item is rated on a 1-5 scale. Five indicates adaptive behavior. Scores may be treated as follows: 4-5 indicates behavior that is positive and of no clinical concern; 3 indicates there is some clinical concern about the behavior; 1-2 indicates behavior of clinical concern.

  2. Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (ERA) Scores

    Time frame: 2 months

    The ERA is an observational measure of parental mental attunement and sensitivity and responsiveness to the infant and of the infant's responsive and regulated behavior during feeding. The mean score for each of the six subscale scores are reported: Parental Positive Affective Involvement, sensitivity, & Responsiveness; Parental Negative Affect and behavior (a higher score indicates less of the parental negative affect and behavior); Infant Positive Affect & Communicative and Social Skills; Infant Dysregulation and Irritability; Dyadic Mutuality and Reciprocity; Dyadic Tension. Each item is rated on a 1-5 scale. Five indicates adaptive behavior. Scores may be treated as follows: 4-5 indicates behavior that is positive and of no clinical concern; 3 indicates there is some clinical concern about the behavior; 1-2 indicates behavior of clinical concern.

  3. Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (ERA) Scores

    Time frame: 6 months

    The ERA is an observational measure of parental mental attunement and sensitivity and responsiveness to the infant and of the infant's responsive and regulated behavior during feeding. The mean score for each of the six subscale scores are reported: Parental Positive Affective Involvement, sensitivity, & Responsiveness; Parental Negative Affect and behavior (a higher score indicates less of the parental negative affect and behavior); Infant Positive Affect & Communicative and Social Skills; Infant Dysregulation and Irritability; Dyadic Mutuality and Reciprocity; Dyadic Tension. Each item is rated on a 1-5 scale. Five indicates adaptive behavior. Scores may be treated as follows: 4-5 indicates behavior that is positive and of no clinical concern; 3 indicates there is some clinical concern about the behavior; 1-2 indicates behavior of clinical concern.

  4. Infant Heart Rate Variability

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks

    Infant heart rate variability is a measure of infant physiologic and bio-behavioral regulation.

Other outcomes

  1. Infant Length

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks

  2. Infant Weight

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks

  3. Infant Head Circumference

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks

  4. Bayley III assessment Scores

    Time frame: 6 months

    Each scale (Motor, Cognitive, Language) is assessed and treated separately. The Motor score includes fine and gross motor sub-test scores. The Cognitive score assesses cognitive development. The Language subscales are for assessment of expressive and language development. Scales are scored to a metric with a mean of 100, standard deviation of 14, and range from 40 to 160. A higher score indicates better development. A score below 85 indicates clinical concern.

  5. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: baseline

    Quality of life was assessed using the SWLS. The SWLS is a 5-item survey, each item is scored on a 7 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 7 is 'strongly agree'. The total possible range of scores is 7-35. Higher total scores indicate more satisfaction in life.

  6. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: up to one week

    Quality of life was assessed using the SWLS. The SWLS is a 5-item survey, each item is scored on a 7 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 7 is 'strongly agree'. The total possible range of scores is 7-35. Higher total scores indicate more satisfaction in life.

  7. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: 2 months

    Quality of life was assessed using the SWLS. The SWLS is a 5-item survey, each item is scored on a 7 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 7 is 'strongly agree'. The total possible range of scores is 7-35. Higher total scores indicate more satisfaction in life.

  8. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: 6 months

    Quality of life was assessed using the SWLS. The SWLS is a 5-item survey, each item is scored on a 7 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 7 is 'strongly agree'. The total possible range of scores is 7-35. Higher total scores indicate more satisfaction in life.

  9. Cutrona Social Provisions Scale

    Time frame: baseline

    Parental Relationship Quality was measured using the Cutrona Social Provisions Scale. This is a 24-item self report assessment, each item scored on a 4 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 4 is 'strongly agree'. The range of total possible scores is 24-96.

  10. Cutrona Social Provisions Scale

    Time frame: up to one week

    Parental Relationship Quality was measured using the Cutrona Social Provisions Scale. This is a 24-item self report assessment, each item scored on a 4 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 4 is 'strongly agree'. The range of total possible scores is 24-96.

  11. Cutrona Social Provisions Scale

    Time frame: 2 months

    Parental Relationship Quality was measured using the Cutrona Social Provisions Scale. This is a 24-item self report assessment, each item scored on a 4 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 4 is 'strongly agree'. The range of total possible scores is 24-96.

  12. Cutrona Social Provisions Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    Parental Relationship Quality was measured using the Cutrona Social Provisions Scale. This is a 24-item self report assessment, each item scored on a 4 point likert scale where 1 is 'strongly disagree' and 4 is 'strongly agree'. The range of total possible scores is 24-96.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Other

Collaborators

  • American Heart Association

Registry information

Official study title

Parent Communication for Feeding an Infant With a Heart Defect - Pilot Intervention Study

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 30, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 1, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.