Hong Ji Hee
Daegu, 42178, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT06963424
The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the pain relief and peripheral perfusion index when local anesthetics injected in different final target area during lumbar erector spinae block The secondary endpoint of this study is to compare the procedure related pain
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Daegu, 42178, South Korea
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a less invasive, safer, and technically easy alternative procedure to conventional neuraxial anesthetic techniques. In contrast to common neuraxial techniques such as paravertebral and epidural injections, the ESPB targets an interfascial plane which is far from the spinal cord, root, and pleura. First applied to thoracic neuropathic pain, currently ESPB is being applied to postoperative pain control and includes variable clinical situations. In the abdomen and thoracic wall, thoracic ESPB can be applied for pain control after cardiac surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracotomy. Recently, favorable postoperative pain control after lumbar spinal or lower limb surgeries has been reported with lumbar ESPB. In addition, ESPB has also been used for chronic pain conditions in the upper and lower extremities. The final target area of ESPB of cervical, thoarcic, and lumbar regiona is transverse process. Once the needle contact the tip of the transverse process, local anesthetics is injected subsequentely. However, contacting the bony structure with the needle can generage procedure related pain. If ESPB can be performed without touching the transverse process, the satisfaction of patient would be increased. Actually, intertransverse ligament, which is visibe by ultrasound, is present between transverse process. Therefore, if local anesthetics is injected after targeting intertransverse ligament, same effect of pain relief with tarting of transverse process of ESPB is uncertain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
lumbar erectro spinae block
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks after the completion of erector spine plane block
minimum (1) and maximum value (10), lower score means better treatment outcome
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks after the completion of erector spine plane block
minimum (0) and maximum value (60), higher score means better treatment outcome
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Other
Pain Relief and Peripheral Perfusion Index When Local Anesthetics Injected in Different Final Target Area During Lumbar Erector Spinae Block
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06762288
Agnosia, Analgesia
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04333095
Bites and Stings, Block
Plano, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03954249
Anesthesia, Bites and Stings
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05643040
Agnosia, Analgesia
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details