Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06963424

Pain Relief and and Peripheral Perfusion Index During Erector Spinae Block

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the pain relief and peripheral perfusion index when local anesthetics injected in different final target area during lumbar erector spinae block The secondary endpoint of this study is to compare the procedure related pain

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a less invasive, safer, and technically easy alternative procedure to conventional neuraxial anesthetic techniques. In contrast to common neuraxial techniques such as paravertebral and epidural injections, the ESPB targets an interfascial plane which is far from the spinal cord, root, and pleura. First applied to thoracic neuropathic pain, currently ESPB is being applied to postoperative pain control and includes variable clinical situations. In the abdomen and thoracic wall, thoracic ESPB can be applied for pain control after cardiac surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracotomy. Recently, favorable postoperative pain control after lumbar spinal or lower limb surgeries has been reported with lumbar ESPB. In addition, ESPB has also been used for chronic pain conditions in the upper and lower extremities. The final target area of ESPB of cervical, thoarcic, and lumbar regiona is transverse process. Once the needle contact the tip of the transverse process, local anesthetics is injected subsequentely. However, contacting the bony structure with the needle can generage procedure related pain. If ESPB can be performed without touching the transverse process, the satisfaction of patient would be increased. Actually, intertransverse ligament, which is visibe by ultrasound, is present between transverse process. Therefore, if local anesthetics is injected after targeting intertransverse ligament, same effect of pain relief with tarting of transverse process of ESPB is uncertain

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • lumbar disc herniation
  • lumbar foraminal stenosis
  • lumbar central stenosis
  • lumbar spondylolisthesis
  • numerical rating scale > 4
  • back pain functional scale < 45
  • duration of pain > 1 mon
  • patients who can fully understand all items described in back pain functional scale

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergy to local anesthetics or contrast medium
  • Pregnancy
  • Spine deformity
  • Prior history of lumbar spine surgery
  • No previous lumbar MRI or CT
  • Patients with coagulation abnormality

Treatment and study plan

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Procedure

lumbar erectro spinae block

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical rating scale changes among 5 times period

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks after the completion of erector spine plane block

    minimum (1) and maximum value (10), lower score means better treatment outcome

Secondary outcomes

  1. back pain functional scale among 3 times period

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks after the completion of erector spine plane block

    minimum (0) and maximum value (60), higher score means better treatment outcome

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pain Relief and Peripheral Perfusion Index When Local Anesthetics Injected in Different Final Target Area During Lumbar Erector Spinae Block

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 9, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.