Emory University SOM Adult Cardiac Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
NCT Number: NCT00303511
Review the feasibility, safety and outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease who undergo pacemaker implantation for bradycardia, tachycardia or heart failure indications
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Survival to adulthood is now common for children born with congenital heart defects (CHD). This improved survival is in large part due to advances in cardiac surgery over the past 4 decades. However, few cardiac surgical repairs are curative. Many 'repaired' children with congenital heart defects later develop problems as adults. Arrhythmias, need for additional surgery, and heart failure are the more common late sequelae of congenital heart disease (1). In addition, many adults with CHD will need a pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome (inability of the inherent pacemaker of the heart to function properly resulting in bradycardia sometimes alternating with tachycardia), tachyarrhythmias or heart block (2, 3). Certain group of patients, such as those with congenital corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA), d-transposition s/p atrial switch procedures and those with single ventricle physiology are at particular risk of developing heart failure (4). Attached figures show the anatomy of these congenital heart defect. Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves exercise tolerance, symptoms and reduces mortality in adults with heart failure due to acquired left ventricular dysfunction.(5-8). In addition, automatic internal cardioverter - defibrillators (ICD) have now been shown to decrease mortality in patients with low ejection fraction due to ischemic or non-ischemic etiologies (9, 10).
Patients with CHD pose a challenge to traditional transvenous pacemaker lead placement due to either complex venous anatomy that precludes conventional percutaneous approaches for pacemaker implantation or occlusions of central venous form multiple prior procedures (11, 12). As evident in the study by Janousek et.al, 7 out of 8 patients enrolled in this study required a thoracotomy for lead placement (4). While thoracoscopic epicardial lead placement has been described for placement of pacemaker leads in adults without congenital heart defects (13, 14), it has not been described for adult patients with congenital heart disease.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 30 days
The ability to place a pacemaker with capture (have the pacemaker work properly) through totally thoracoscopic approach to epicardial pacing lead without requiring conversion to open procedure
Emory University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03262168
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Clydebank, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06970158
Cleft Lip Palate, Congenital Disorder
Chennai, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06038123
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bradycardia
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07393009
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bradycardia
Adelaide, Australia
View Trial Details