Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07687680

Ozone Versus Conventional Socket Disinfection for Primary Dental Implant Stability

This randomized split-mouth controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of ozone and conventional implant site disinfection on primary and early secondary implant stability. Systemically healthy adults requiring at least two dental implants in symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites will receive ozone disinfection at one implant site and conventional disinfection at the paired site according to a randomized allocation. Implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (Implant Stability Quotient, ISQ), and secondary stability will be evaluated by ISQ measurements at the 3-month follow-up during healing abutment placement. The study will determine whether ozone disinfection improves implant stability during the early osseointegration period.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Dentistry, Adıyaman University

Adıyaman, Merkez, 02030, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Primary implant stability is a key determinant of successful osseointegration and long-term implant survival. Various implant site disinfection methods have been proposed to reduce the microbial load before implant placement. Ozone possesses antimicrobial and biostimulatory properties and may improve the biological environment for implant healing compared with conventional implant site disinfection.

The purpose of this randomized split-mouth controlled clinical trial is to compare ozone implant site disinfection with conventional implant site disinfection in terms of primary and early secondary implant stability.

Systemically healthy adults requiring at least two dental implants in symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites will be enrolled. According to a randomized split-mouth design, one implant site will receive ozone disinfection before implant placement, whereas the paired implant site will receive conventional disinfection. This design allows each participant to serve as their own control, thereby minimizing inter-individual variability.

Primary implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement using insertion torque measurements and resonance frequency analysis (Implant Stability Quotient, ISQ). Secondary implant stability will be evaluated by resonance frequency analysis at the 3-month follow-up during healing abutment placement. All clinical procedures will be standardized and performed by experienced clinicians. The study aims to determine whether ozone implant site disinfection provides superior implant stability during the early osseointegration period compared with conventional implant site disinfection.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Systemically healthy individuals requiring at least two dental implants.
  • Presence of symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites suitable for dental implant placement.
  • Adequate bone volume for implant placement without the need for simultaneous bone augmentation.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and comply with the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Systemically healthy individuals requiring at least two dental implants.
  • Presence of symmetrical or contralateral edentulous sites suitable for dental implant placement.
  • Adequate bone volume for implant placement without the need for simultaneous bone augmentation.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and comply with the study protocol.

Treatment and study plan

Ozone Implant Site Disinfection

Procedure

Before dental implant placement, the implant site assigned to the experimental intervention is disinfected using ozone according to the study protocol. In this randomized split-mouth design, each participant receives ozone disinfection at one implant site, while the paired contralateral or symmetrical implant site receives conventional disinfection. Implant stability is evaluated immediately after implant placement using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (ISQ), and again after 3 months using ISQ.

Conventional Socket Disinfection

Procedure

Before dental implant placement, the implant site assigned to the control intervention is disinfected using the conventional disinfection protocol. In this randomized split-mouth design, each participant receives conventional disinfection at one implant site, while the paired contralateral or symmetrical implant site receives ozone disinfection. Implant stability is evaluated immediately after implant placement using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (ISQ), and again after 3 months using ISQ.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Implant Stability (Insertion Torque)

    Time frame: Immediately after implant placement

    Primary implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement by measuring insertion torque (Ncm).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zeliha Başak Çakır Erdil

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Ozone and Conventional Socket Disinfection in Dental Implant Placement in Terms of Primary Stability

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.