University of Valencia
Valencia, 46003, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07535528
The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the influence of subcrestal implant placement depth (-2 mm vs -4 mm) on peri-implant marginal bone level changes, including marginal bone loss and bone remodeling. Secondary outcomes include implant success, peri-implant probing depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BoP).
Partially edentulous patients requiring fixed implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation with two implants in posterior maxillary or mandibular regions will be included. Implants will be placed subcrestally at either -2 mm or -4 mm from the bone crest, following a submerged healing protocol. Allocation to insertion depth will be randomized. Marginal bone level changes will be assessed using standardized periapical radiographs at second-stage surgery, prosthesis placement, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after functional loading. PPD and BoP will be recorded at the same time points.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Valencia, 46003, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive bone-level dental implants placed subcrestally at either -2 mm or -4 mm below the bone crest in healed posterior sites of the maxilla or mandible, according to randomization. Implant placement will follow the manufacturer's drilling protocol, achieving a final insertion torque of at least 35 Ncm. A transmucosal abutment will be connected at the time of surgery, with height selected based on implant placement depth (2-3 mm for -2 mm placement and 4-5 mm for -4 mm placement). The abutment will be tightened to a final torque of at least 30 Ncm following a one abutment-one time protocol.
Time frame: From abutment placement (baseline time [TB]), 1 month post (T1), and at 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months after definitive prosthesis placement.
Parallelized periapical radiographs will be obtained and a calibrated digital tool will be used to determine the vertical distance from the implant-abutment junction to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal sides. Unit of measure: Milimeters (mm)
Time frame: 1 month post-op (T1), and at months 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) after definitive prosthesis placement.
Peri-implant soft tissue condition will be assessed by recording PPD using a periodontal probe at six surfaces per implant (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and the corresponding lingual/palatal sites) to calculate the mean of every implant. Unit of measure: Milimeters (mm)
Time frame: 1 month post-op (T1), and at months 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) after definitive prosthesis placement.
Bleeding on probing will be measured by gently passing a periodontal probe (using ~20-25g of force) to the base of the sulcus/pocket of the prosthesis at six surfaces per implant (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and the corresponding lingual/palatal sites), then waiting 30 seconds to observe bleeding. It will be recorded as a dichotomous score (yes/no). Unit of measure: Percentage of sites showing bleeding per implant.
Time frame: From the time of surgery through the end of the 12-month follow-up period after definitive prosthesis placement.
Assessment of the implants will be performed by categorizing them into: success (optimal health), satisfactory survival, compromised survival, or failure.
Time frame: At enrollment time.
Baseline variables will be collected for descriptive purposes and will not be combined into a single outcome measure. These include: age (years); sex (male/female); smoking habit (non-smoker or ≤10 cigarettes/day); brushing frequency (0, 1-2, or 3 times/day); edentulism type (interdental or free end); periodontal phenotype (thin or thick); antagonist type (natural teeth, tooth-supported bridge, implant-supported prosthesis, or removable prosthesis); cause of tooth loss (caries, periodontitis, or fracture); implant location (arch and quadrant); and soft tissue thickness (mm).
University of Valencia
Other
Influence of Implant Placement Depth (-2 mm vs -4 mm Subcrestal) on Peri-implant Tissue Conditions: a Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07687680
Dental Implant Placement, Ozone Therapy
Adıyaman, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07373600
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Dental Implant Placement
View Trial DetailsNCT07008079
Dental Implant, Dental Implant Placement
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT04310449
Dental Implant Placement
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details