Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06036004

Oxytocin Substitution Therapy in Patients With Central Diabetes Insipidus

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial aims to investigate intranasal OXT as a novel therapeutical option in central diabetes insipidus (cDI) to improve psychological symptoms and socio-emotional functioning.

Optionally, patients can present for additional assessments in sub-studies:

* fMRI sub-study at day 14 (± 2 days) (one additional visit) * Social-stress sub-study at day 14 (± 2 days) (one additional visit)

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OXT) are hormones released into circulation from the posterior pituitary. While AVP acts mainly in the kidneys and causes reuptake of free water, OXT is well-known for its key role in the regulation of complex social-emotional functioning including attachment and pair bonding, fear possessing, emotion recognition, and empathy.

Disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis can cause AVP deficiency

  • known as central diabetes insipidus (cDI) - characterized by polyuria and polydipsia. Once diagnosed, desmopressin (an AVP receptor analogue) can be effectively used to treat diabetes insipidus. However, despite treatment with desmopressin, patients often report residual psychological symptoms, particularly heightened anxiety levels, depressed mood, impairment in social interactions, leading to an overall reduced quality of life.

Due to the anatomical proximity, local disruptions of the AVP system could also disturb the OXT system leading to an additional OXT deficiency. The additional OXT deficiency could explain (at least partially) the residual psychological deficits in patients with cDI. OXT replacement therapy to improve psychological symptoms would have great clinical implications. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial aims to investigate intranasal OXT as a novel therapeutical option in cDI to improve psychological symptoms and socio-emotional functioning.

Optional fMRI sub-study: Participants will undergo a structural sequence to investigate grey and white matter anatomy (T1- weighted). Functional neuronal responses will be assessed through the surrogate of blood oxygenated level dependent (BOLD) signal, an indirect measure of neural activity. Three functional sequences (echo planar imaging, EPI) will investigate group differences in various aspects of brain activity: a resting state sequence and the EFMT.

Optional Social-stress sub-study: The three main components are an anticipation phase, a 5-minute interview, and a surprise mental arithmetic task. Acute stress is measured by cortisol increase.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of central diabetes insipidus based on accepted criteria
  • Heightened anxiety levels (STAI - Trait subscale ≥ 39 score points) or alexithymia levels (impaired ability to identify and describe feelings; TAS-20 total ≥ 52 score points)
  • Stable hormone replacement therapy for at least three months with desmopressin and, in case of additional anterior pituitary deficiencies, with the respective substitution therapies.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participation in a trial with investigational drugs within 30 days
  • Active substance use disorder within the last six months
  • Consumption of alcoholic beverages >15 drinks/week
  • Current or previous psychotic disorder (e.g., schizophrenia spectrum disorder)
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding within the last eight weeks
  • Unwilling to use a medically acceptable form of contraception throughout the study period (female of childbearing potential only)
  • Prolonged QTc-time >470 ms assessed with a 12-lead electrocardiogram.

Treatment and study plan

Intranasal OXT

Drug

Syntocinon® contains the synthesized peptide OXT in a solution formulated to promote absorption through the nasal mucosa. Additional ingredients are E216 (propyl-4-hydroxybenzoate), E218 (methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate), and chlorobutanol hemihydrate. One bottle contains 5 ml, i.e., 200 IU of OXT in total. Each 0.1 ml nasal insulation delivers 4 IU of oxytocin.

OXT (24 IU twice daily) is given for 28 (± 2) days of treatment.

Placebo nasal spray

Other

The placebo will contain no OXT but, otherwise, be identical to the intranasal OXT product with respect to the other ingredients.

Placebo is given twice daily for 28 (± 2) days of treatment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire to assess general anxiety levels

    Time frame: Day 0, day 1, day 14, day 28

    Questionnaire with scores ranging from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("almost always"). The STAI has two sub-scales, the State-Anxiety Scale (STAI-S; 20 items) and the Trait-Anxiety Scale (STAI-T; 20 items). The STAI-S evaluates the current state of anxiety, asking how respondents feel "right now," using items that measure subjective feelings of apprehension, tension, nervousness, worry, and activation/arousal of the autonomic nervous system. The STAI-T evaluates relatively stable aspects of "anxiety proneness," including general states of calmness, confidence, and security. The total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating more pronounced anxiety. A score above 39/80 indicates clinically significant anxiety symptoms.

  2. Change in EmBody/EmFace to assess recognition of facial and body expressions

    Time frame: Day 0, day 1, day 28

    The EmBody and EmFace subtasks comprise each of 42 stimuli showing body or facial expressions of angry, happy, or neutral affect. Stimuli last 1.5 seconds at 24 frames per second and are geometrically and optically standardised to prevent biases induced by ethnic cues. Each trial consists of one point-light display (PLD), followed by a response window during which participants are asked to indicate via mouse input which emotion they believe was portrayed in the PLD in a three-option forced-choice format (angry-neutral-happy). The total correct classification scores range from 0 to 42 (for each sub-task), with higher scores indicating more correct recognition of facial & body expressions.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Facial emotion recognition task (FERT) to assess emotion recognition and empathy

    Time frame: Day 0, day 28

    The FERT assesses the recognition of basic emotions. The task includes ten neutral faces and 160 faces that express one of four basic emotions (i.e., happiness, sadness, anger, and fear), with pictures morphed between 0% (i.e., neutral) and 100% in 10% steps. Stimuli are shown in random order for 500 ms, followed by the rating screen, where participants have to indicate the correct emotion. The outcome measure is accuracy (proportion correct).

  2. Change in Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET) to assess the cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy

    Time frame: Day 0, day 1, day 28

    The computer-assisted test consists of 40 photographs that showed people in emotionally charged situations. To assess cognitive empathy, the participants are required to infer the mental state of the subject in each scene and indicate the correct mental state from a list of four responses. Cognitive empathy is the percentage of correct responses in the total responses. To measure emotional empathy, the subjects are asked to rate how much they feel for an individual in each scene (i.e., explicit emotional empathy) and how much they are aroused by each scene (i.e., implicit emotional empathy) on a 1-9 point scale.

  3. Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM) to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms

    Time frame: Day 0, day 28

    The scale consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, and measures both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). The physician/psychologist is instructed to assess the extent to which the patient displays the given criterion. Each item is independently scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56 (<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity, and 25-30 moderate to severe).

  4. Change in Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20 (TAS-20) to assess emotions experienced by oneself or others

    Time frame: Day 0, day 28

    The TAS 20 has a three- factor structure: difficulty identifying and describing feelings and externally oriented thinking. It includes 20 items with scores ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse alexithymia. A score of ≥61 indicates alexithymia (difficulty understanding one's emotions), a score of 52 to 60 indicates possible alexithymia, and a ≤51 non-alexithymia.

  5. Change in Autism-Spectrum Quotient Test (AQ) to assess the expression of ASD traits in an individual by his or her subjective self-assessment

    Time frame: Day 0, day 28

    The AQ consists of 50 items, with four choices for each item from "definitely agree" to "definitely disagree" and a total score from 0 to 50. A score above the proposed cut-off of 29 highlights significant traits of autism

  6. Change in Beck's Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) to assess depression

    Time frame: Day 0, day 28

    It uses 21 items ranked from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms) to measure the severity of depression. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 63. In non-clinical populations, scores above 20 indicate depression. In those diagnosed with depression, the score ≤16, mild mood disturbance; 17 to 20, borderline clinical depression, 21 to 30, moderate depression, and score ≥31, severe depression.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Close third-person assessment

    Time frame: Day 0, day 28

    A telephone interview with a close third individual can be conducted to provide a subjective assessment at the beginning and the end of the treatment phase. Assessment will be done by rating 10 socio-emotional items such as "closeness to others," "anxious behaviour daily life," "empathic feeling," etc., by using unidirectional 100-point or bidirectional -50/+50-point visual analogue scales.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mirjam Christ-Crain, Prof. Dr. med.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 61 328 70 80

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Oxytocin Substitution Therapy in Patients With AVP Deficiency (Central Diabetes Insipidus)

Acronym: OxyTUTION

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Registry last updated
May 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.