Selective Caries Removal (No Pulp Exposure)
ProcedureCaries excavation technique where clinician leaves carious tissue so close to pulp
Other names: SCR
NCT Number: NCT06378814
Patients presenting with deep decay within permanent teeth presents a common clinical challenge to dentists. The aim of this trial is to compare the success rate of the non-selective caries removal (NSCR) and selective caries removal (SCR) in managing deep caries, as both methods are commonly used in clinical practice.
This study will be a randomized controlled trial, with participants divided into two groups: NSCR group and SCR group. Participants of deep caries lesions (reaching more than two-thirds of dentin on periapical radiographs) Both groups will undergo either NSCR or SCR, followed by Partial Pulpotomy (PP) in cases with pulp exposure. Success rates will be assessed at follow-up visits scheduled 1, 3, and 5 years radiographs will be used to assess for pulp health(vitality).
The success rate of the two categories will be assessed using a scale that includes factors such as tooth vitality, caries recurrence, and clinical signs of pulpitis. The scale will be applied at follow-up visits. The trial will be conducted in post-graduate dental clinics at Guy's hospital.
Deep caries in permanent teeth is a common clinical problem that can lead to pulp exposure and subsequent restorative challenges. The aim of this study is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in managing deep caries lesions, as both NSCR and SCR are commonly used in clinical practice. The results of this study will help clinicians to make informed decisions when choosing the appropriate treatment approach for their patients.
In conclusion, this trial aims to compare the success rate of NSCR and SCR in managing deep caries lesions in permanent teeth, as both methods are commonly used in clinical practice. The results of this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these two treatment approaches and will help clinicians to make informed decisions when choosing the appropriate treatment approaches.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The clinical trial aims to compare the outcomes of non-selective versus selective caries removal.
Both techniques are used routinely as a standard of care at GSTT. Patients will receive the same treatment as caries removal, but the difference will be in the technique that will be used and the decision of which will be used will be by the randomization. Patients will be randomized on the base of the tooth to one of the two caries removal techniques.
Competent, adult patients meeting inclusion criteria will receive appropriate dental care as part of their routine clinical management, and any abnormal findings will be communicated to them. Participants will be informed about the exposure to radiation involved in the study protocol and will receive periapical and bitewing radiograph. Periapical and bitewing radiographs are x rays those used routinely at GSTT. Also they will be informed that In the unlikely event of treatment failure, patients will be offered root canal treatment to provide definite care. Patients will be randomized through an audited clinical trials tool.
PhD(Doctor of Philosophy) student is the involved with the samples transfer and analysis where she is going to take training and certificates needed including HTA certificate.
The clinical trial will adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients may withdraw from the study at any time, and their clinical care will be unaffected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Caries excavation technique where clinician leaves carious tissue so close to pulp
Other names: SCR
Complete caries removal even in areas so close to pulp
Other names: NSCR
In caes of Pulp exposure Amputation of inflamed coronal pulp and capping of remaining vital tissue
Other names: Miniature Pulpotomy
Time frame: After One year
This study aims to compare between reported success rate (maintained pulp vitality) in cases of deep caries lesion when treated by by Selective caries removal and non-selective caries removal.
Pulp sensibility tests will be used to assess the response of the pulp to external stimuli (pulp vitality).
The success rate will be calculated as the ratio of cases with maintained pulp vitality to the total treated cases in each group.
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 5 years after the intervention
The study aims to evaluate periapical health in the treatment of deep caries lesions using selective caries removal and partial pulpotomy. The assessment will be done using the Periapical Index Score. The Periapical Index Score is a standardized scoring system based on radiographic findings, allowing for the identification of healing or failure outcomes. The Periapical Index (PAI) score is a radiographic scale used in endodontics to evaluate the severity of periapical lesions. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe periapical pathology. A score of 1 represents no changes, while a score of 5 indicates extensive destruction of periapical tissues. In summary, higher PAI scores correspond to worse outcomes, indicating greater periapical pathology, while lower scores reflect healthier periapical regions.
Time frame: after one year of the intervention.
This study aims to assess the impact of selective caries removal and partial pulpotomy on the quality of life of participants with deep caries lesions. Quantitative assessment will be done using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) is a questionnaire used to measure how oral health affects a person's quality of life. It consists of 14 items and assesses various aspects of oral health-related impact, such as physical discomfort, functional limitations, psychological discomfort, and social disability. The scores on the OHIP-14 range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact on quality of life. In summary, higher OHIP-14 scores signify a worse outcome, indicating a higher burden of oral health problems and a greater impact on daily life functioning. Lower scores indicate a better outcome, reflecting a lesser impact of oral health issues on overall quality of life.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Francesco Mannoci, Professor
CONTACT
Sakha Z Abdelkhader, PhD student
CONTACT
King's College London
Other
Randomized Clinical Trial of Treatment Outcomes of Selective Versus Nonselective Caries Removal in Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth.
Acronym: RCT-SNCR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07028905
Deep Caries
View Trial DetailsNCT06882343
Caries, Dental, Deep Caries
View Trial DetailsNCT06497231
Deep Caries, Dental Caries
View Trial DetailsNCT06219824
Deep Caries, Pulpotomy
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details