Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01751841

Outcome Analysis for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Navigation

Prospective/Retrospective data analysis, chart reviews and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive spine surgery

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center

New York, 10065, United States

About this study

STUDY RATIONALE AND PRIMARY OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS To assess the clinical and radiographic outcome of spinal fusion procedures using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP), a newer-generation of synthetic ceramics designed to maximize osteoinduction and osteoconduction.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Study

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Providing compelling evidence for the efficacy of Si-CaP in terms of resulting in satisfactory fusion.

SUMMARY OF METHODS A prospectively collected database will be reviewed retrospectively, to retrieve data of 200 patients who have undergone different spinal fusion procedures using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP). An average follow up duration of at least 12 months will be considered. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Pre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores. A board certified Neuro-radiologist will assess the fusion rate. Fusion will be determined by the presence of bony bridging on 2 consecutive sections in at least 2 planes on computed tomographic imaging.

SECONDARY ENDPOINTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS The purpose of this study is to evaluate the level of clinical and radiographic improvement in patients implanted with Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP) as a bone graft substitute material for spinal fusions. More comprehensive long term studies will be able to provide compelling evidence for the efficacy of Si-CaP in terms of resulting in satisfactory fusion. They can more strongly support the previously published data implying that Si-CaP can be utilized as an alternative to autogenous bone graft in spinal arthrodesis procedures.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with different spinal fusion procedures (including axial lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, extreme lateral interbody fusion, posterior cervical fusion, and anterior discectomy and fusion using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate as a bone graft substitute.

Exclusion criteria

  • Utilization of any other bone extenders in addition to Si-CaP as a bone graft substitute.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual analog scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Pre-operative pain scores will be compared to the latest follow-up pain scores.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fusion on CT imaging or flexion-extension radiographs.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    A board certified Neuro-radiologist will assess the fusion rate.Fusion will be determined by the presence of bony bridging on 2 consecutive sections in at least 2 planes on computed tomographic imaging.

  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Pre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores.

  3. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Pre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 18, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 29, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.