Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center
New York, 10065, United States
NCT Number: NCT01751841
Prospective/Retrospective data analysis, chart reviews and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive spine surgery
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
New York, 10065, United States
STUDY RATIONALE AND PRIMARY OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS To assess the clinical and radiographic outcome of spinal fusion procedures using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP), a newer-generation of synthetic ceramics designed to maximize osteoinduction and osteoconduction.
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Study
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Providing compelling evidence for the efficacy of Si-CaP in terms of resulting in satisfactory fusion.
SUMMARY OF METHODS A prospectively collected database will be reviewed retrospectively, to retrieve data of 200 patients who have undergone different spinal fusion procedures using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP). An average follow up duration of at least 12 months will be considered. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Pre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores. A board certified Neuro-radiologist will assess the fusion rate. Fusion will be determined by the presence of bony bridging on 2 consecutive sections in at least 2 planes on computed tomographic imaging.
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS The purpose of this study is to evaluate the level of clinical and radiographic improvement in patients implanted with Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP) as a bone graft substitute material for spinal fusions. More comprehensive long term studies will be able to provide compelling evidence for the efficacy of Si-CaP in terms of resulting in satisfactory fusion. They can more strongly support the previously published data implying that Si-CaP can be utilized as an alternative to autogenous bone graft in spinal arthrodesis procedures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Pre-operative pain scores will be compared to the latest follow-up pain scores.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
A board certified Neuro-radiologist will assess the fusion rate.Fusion will be determined by the presence of bony bridging on 2 consecutive sections in at least 2 planes on computed tomographic imaging.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Pre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Pre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06199999
Bone Diseases, Confusion
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04984629
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04416321
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00948532
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial Details