Optimizing OR Simulation in MEDI 045: Bias Reduction and Strategic Improvements (OPTIMIST)

This study explores the evolving landscape of operating room (OR) simulation by identifying key trends, addressing potential biases, and providing actionable recommendations for improvement. Using data-driven analysis, the research uncovers patterns in skill development and decision-making, offering insights into the effectiveness of current OR simulation programs. The study also tackles biases in data collection, including selection and response bias, ensuring the reliability of findings.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Conditions

Competency-Based Education Continuity of Patient Care Medical Education

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

King Saud University MedicalCity, Riyadh, Riydh, Saudi Arabia

About this study

The effectiveness of simulation training is crucial in medical education, particularly for skills retention and perceived effectiveness. This section evaluates the overall effectiveness of SimMan3G sessions in enhancing clinical skills among participants.

Objectives

To analyze the correlation between the number of SimMan3G sessions and skill retention.
To assess the perceived effectiveness of simulation training.
To provide actionable recommendations for improving simulation training effectiveness.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Participants enrolled in the MEDI 045 anesthesia program at King Saud Medical City.
Medical students or trainees with prior exposure to basic clinical simulation.
Aged 18 years or older.
Willingness to participate in simulation-based training sessions.
Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Participants with prior advanced simulation training in anesthesia.
Individuals with documented cognitive impairments or learning disabilities that may interfere with the study tasks.
Refuse to participate in post-simulation assessments or follow-ups.
Lack of fluency in the language of instruction used in the simulation.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

Change in Cognitive Bias in Clinical Decision-Making

Time frame: Immediately after simulation training (within 1 day) Over 6 months post-training

Evaluate the change in cognitive bias during simulated clinical scenarios using the Cognitive Bias Assessment Tool (CBAT). This tool assesses the presence of cognitive biases (e.g., confirmation bias, anchoring bias) in decision-making.

The unit of measure will be the percentage of bias-free decisions or correct decisions made by participants, based on the CBAT scoring system.

The assessment will occur immediately after simulation training (within 1 day) and again 6 months post-training to measure both immediate and long-term changes in cognitive bias.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Walid Mohamed Ragab Mohamed Badwi

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

OPTIMIST Optimizing OR Simulation in MEDI 045 Anesthesia Program: Trends, Bias Reduction, and Strategic Improvements and Shaping Future Practices OPTIMIST

Acronym: OPTIMIST

Important dates

Study start: 2024
Primary completion: 2025
Study completion: 2025
First posted: Dec 31, 2024
Registry last updated: Dec 31, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed