Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06755203

Evaluating the Impact of Operating Room Simulations on Communication Skills and Patient Safety (EIORS-CPS)

Simulation-based training has emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing communication skills among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of operating room (OR) simulations on the development of communication skills for patient safety. The study focused on two key areas: the development of communication skills for patient-centered care and the role of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in enhancing communication and patient safety during simulations.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

King Saud University , College of Medicine, Anesthesia Department

Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Dr. Walid M Badwi, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+966 547 874 681

About this study

This study will provide valuable insights into student preferences for logbook formats in anesthesiology education, specifically within the MEDI 045 course. By comparing Excel sheet logbooks with traditional paper logbooks, it aims to elucidate how different documentation methods impact student engagement, satisfaction, and learning outcomes.

Understanding these preferences is crucial, as logbooks are not merely administrative tools but integral components of the educational experience that promote reflection, accountability, and skill development in clinical practice.

The findings will contribute to existing knowledge by identifying specific advantages and disadvantages of each format, highlighting the aspects that enhance or hinder student learning. Moreover, the research will inform curriculum designers and educators about effective strategies for logbook implementation, ultimately leading to improved educational tools that better align with students' needs

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must be medical students enrolled in the MEDI 045 course at King Saud University.

Must have prior exposure to basic patient safety and communication skills training.

Age: 18-25 years. Students must voluntarily consent to participate in the study and complete the required simulations and assessments.

Exclusion criteria

Students who have already completed formal simulation-based training on communication or patient safety outside the MEDI 045 curriculum.

Students are unable to participate in simulation sessions due to scheduling conflicts or medical reasons.

Participants were unwilling to provide informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Operating Room Simulation Training

Other

The intervention involves high-fidelity OR simulations focusing on critical areas of patient safety, including:

Communication Skills: Emphasizing clear communication during surgical procedures.

Stress Management: Training participants to manage stress effectively in high-pressure situations.

Protocol Adherence: Practicing adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. Risk Assessment: Identifying and mitigating potential safety risks in simulated scenarios

Other names: Patient Safety Simulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Improving Patient Safety Training through Simulation

    Time frame: 7-8 months

    Evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based training in promoting patient safety with a focus on:

    Authenticity: Scenarios mirroring real operating room environments. Stress Management & Communication: Improving interpersonal dynamics, team synergy, and decision-making under pressure.

    Protocol Compliance & Risk Evaluation: Ensuring adherence to patient safety best practices.

    WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: Enhancing communication and protocol adherence. Evaluation Tool: Patient Safety Simulation Assessment Scale (PSSAS).

    Scale Range: 0-10

    Criteria:

    0-3: Minimal improvement. 4-6: Moderate improvement. 7-8: Significant improvement. 9-10: Excellent improvement. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Communication Skills during Simulations

    Time frame: 7-8 months

    Evaluate the enhancement of communicative competencies, placing particular emphasis on:

    Clarity of Communication: The proficiency in transmitting information with efficacy. Teamwork: The synergy and coordination exhibited within the group. Adherence to Structured Communication Protocols: The implementation of standardized tools such as SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation). Measurement Tool: A bespoke Structured Communication Skills Evaluation Checklist (SCSEC) will be employed. Scale Range: 0-10 Scoring Criteria: 0-3: Insignificant clarity and teamwork, accompanied by inadequate adherence to protocols. 4-6: Moderate clarity and teamwork, coupled with partial compliance to protocols. 7-8: Robust clarity and teamwork, characterized by commendable adherence to protocols. 9-10: Exemplary clarity and teamwork, demonstrating complete adherence to protocols. Elevated scores signify superior outcomes.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Walid M Badwi, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

00966547874681

jumana B BAAJ, consultant

CONTACT

[email protected]

009664670011

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King Saud Medical City

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating the Impact of Operating Room Simulations on Communication Skills and Patient Safety

Acronym: EIORS-CPS

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 1, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 1, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.