Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00729703

Optimal Anti-tachycardia Therapy in Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Patients Without Pacing Indications

This study evaluates the impact of a new pacing mode avoiding unnecessary ventricular stimulation in combination with advanced dual chamber detection with slow VT management on the clinical outcome for hospitalization and mortality and inadequate therapy in medically stable, ICD-indicated patients with impaired left ventricular function (LVEF ≤ 40%) who do not have pacing indications and no indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). It compares a new pacing mode avoiding ventricular stimulation when not needed combined with dual chamber detection with a pure ventricular back up pacing and single chamber detection criteria with pure ventricular back up pacing. Therapies are compared in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel trial with a 24-month randomized treatment period. Randomization follows a 1:1 ratio. ICD therapy is enabled for all patients throughout the study. All patients receive optimal drug therapy for arrhythmia and heart failure treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Algemeen Ziekenhuis - Antwepen, Antwepen, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

All patients will receive an implantable cardioverter defibrillator OVATIO™ DR model 6550 or a later Sorin Group device offering the same functions. After Enrolment visit but before implant, patients will be randomized in two arms according to the parallel study design. Whenever possible before implant there will be the first Holter recording for the Tvar risk stratification procedure. In case Tvar recording could not be performed before implant it has to be performed before patient leaves the hospital post implant in unpaced rhythm.

The dual-chamber arm will be programmed to 3 detection zones with PARAD+ activated.

The TDI for the slow VT zone will be set to 500 ms (120 bpm - or in case the resting rate is higher than 90 bpm it is recommended to adjust this parameter to: resting rate + 30 bpm) and at least one ATP program activated as specified in table 1.

A VT zone with a TDI of 353 ms (170 bpm) in case of no history of VT or a TDI cycle length equalling slowest documented VT interval (spontaneous or induced) plus 50 ms is required. In this 2nd VT zone therapies need to be activated in this group.

AAIsafeR2 mode will be activated with a basic rate of 60 bpm. The single-chamber arm will be programmed to optimal detection with Acceleration (Onset), Stability and Long Cycle Search (VTLC) activated. A VT zone is requested in this group, with the same programming procedures as described above. Therapies will be set according to the clinical judgment of the participating investigators but a Slow VT-zone with TDI 500 ms in monitoring setting at least is required.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient has been prescribed the implantation for an ICD system accordingly to the relevant currently-approved ACC/AHA guidelines 1 or ESC guidelines 35 or any relevant currently-approved local guidelines for the implantation of an ICD-system
  • Impaired left ventricular function demonstrated by a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40 %, measured by angio-scintigraphy, echocardiography, or contrast ventriculogram.
  • An optimal (as determined by the enrolling physician) medical regimen.
  • Patient has received all relevant information on the study, and has signed and dated a consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any generally accepted indication for standard cardiac pacing, or any contraindication for standard cardiac pacing.
  • Any indication for CRT accordingly to the relevant currently-approved ACC/AHA1 or ESC35 guidelines for the implantation of a CRT system.
  • Any contraindication for ICD therapy and the implant of a dual chamber ICD.
  • ICD replacement
  • Chronic atrial arrhythmias or cardioversion for atrial fibrillation within the past month.
  • A PR interval > 250 ms or AR interval > 300 ms measured at implant.
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
  • Acute myocarditis.
  • Unstable coronary symptoms or myocardial infarction within the last month.
  • Recent (within the last month) or planned cardiac revascularization or coronary angioplasty.
  • Recently performed (in the last month) or planned cardiac surgery
  • Already included in another clinical study.
  • Life expectancy less than 24 months.
  • Inability to understand the purpose of the study or refusal to cooperate.
  • Inability or refusal to provide informed consent and, if not part of the informed consent, a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization.
  • Unavailability for scheduled follow-up at the implanting or cooperating center.
  • Age of less than 18 years.
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Ovatio DR 6550

Device

Dual-chamber ICD therapy with minimized ventricular pacing

Primary outcomes

  1. The first part is the time to first occurrence of inappropriate ICD shock therapy. The second part is the composite endpoint of time to first occurrence of death (all causes)or Hospitalizations due to cardio-vascular event.

    Time frame: implant, 3 months, 9 months, 15 months, 21 months and 27 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. all cause mortality and cardio-vascular related mortality

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  2. Hospitalizations due to cardio-vascular event (specified for each type of event)

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  3. Time to first occurrence of inappropriate ICD shock therapy

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  4. Evaluation of the impact of the different therapies on quality of life and heart failure status

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  5. Sensitivity and specificity for VT/SVT discrimination for the first 100 patients in each group.

    Time frame: 27 months

  6. Inappropriate overall device reactions defined by inappropriate shock and/or ATP therapy or inappropriate therapy delay/inhibition > 2 minutes on VTs

    Time frame: 27 months

  7. time to first documented AF occurrence and number of patients moving into permanent or persistent AF

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  8. Cardiac dimensions obtained by echo evaluation for a subset of patients of both groups

    Time frame: Baseline and 27 months

  9. Slow VT incidence

    Time frame: 27 months

  10. Unscheduled visits and hospitalizations due to slow VT

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  11. System related complications including lead dislodgements, exit block, oversensing which requires programming corrections, infections, complications which require reintervention

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  12. Cumulative percentage of ventricular pacing and proportion of patients with 0% V pacing.

    Time frame: 27 months follow up

  13. Overall success rate of ATP in the FVT zone

    Time frame: 27 months

  14. Cost effectiveness of applied ICD therapy

    Time frame: 27 months

  15. PPV and NPV for Tvar risk stratification

    Time frame: 27 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

LivaNova

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Optimal Antitachycardia Therapy in ICD Patients Without Pacing Indications

Acronym: OPTION

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2013
First posted
Aug 7, 2008
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.