The deinstitutionalisation movement has been implemented since the 1950s, particularly in the UK and the US. Evidence of psychiatric community care has been well-documented, showing improvements in quality of life, increased autonomy, a reduction in psychiatric readmissions, and a shorter length of hospitalisation. However, this movement has not been universally adopted, and a few drawbacks have emerged in the past decade. Increased social risk aversion, such as homicides and a higher incidence of comorbidity of severe mental illnesses and substance abuse, has led to a growing demand for psychiatric inpatient services. Additionally, insufficient long-term community residential care was associated with untreated service users living in prisons or experiencing homelessness. The reduction in psychiatric beds was also associated with an increased prison population in the UK, Central and Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and South America.
From 2000 to 2014, 55% of 161 nations had stable or increasing levels of institutionalisation (> 1% annually). Several national characteristics, for example, population density and the percentage of the population living in urban areas, were negatively associated with deinstitutionalisation. The findings argued that the development of deinstitutionalisation should carefully consider the maturity of local psychiatric facilities and systems; otherwise, achieving a balance of optimal psychiatric inpatient care and deinstitutionalisation may be difficult. This imbalance can lead to a shift of service users into the criminal justice system. Moreover, deinstitutionalisation was positively associated with acute admission rates and bed occupancy. A viewpoint published in JAMA discussed the dilemma of psychiatric inpatient care versus community psychiatric development in the US, calling for integrated, patient-centred long-term psychiatric hospital and outpatient care for individuals with chronic, serious mental health conditions.
Since 2010, the Hong Kong government has made extensive efforts and committed significant resources to community psychiatric care, including the extended hospital community psychiatric services (CPS) and district-based community mental health centres. However, these initiatives led to a reduction in emergency psychiatric admissions, which is one of the key quality indicators of community mental health care, for neuroses, but not for other diagnoses of mental health conditions, particularly for severe mental illnesses. A balanced mental health system that integrates psychiatric inpatient and CPS care, especially for severe mental illnesses with notable risks of violence and suicide, should be actively reconsidered. As psychiatric inpatient service capacity decreases during active deinstitutionalisation, optimal psychiatric inpatient care has often been overlooked, which may hinder the development of specialised inpatient services and pose risks to clinical quality and safety due to overcrowded ward environments and increased admission turnover rates, commonly known as the 'revolving door' effect.
