Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05946200

Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Low-flow and Normal-flow Rate Anesthesia

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the regularly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures. It resulted in shorter hospital stays, improved cosmetic outcomes, and reduced bleeding and pain. However, during laparoscopic surgeries, the pneumoperitoneum is known to raise intracranial pressure (ICP), reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF), and as a consequence, cerebral hypoxia. There are various possible advantages of low-flow anesthesia. During laparoscopic procedures, low-flow anesthesia may be used as a means of preventing a rise in intracranial pressure and cerebral hypoxia. But low flow anesthesia effects on İCP are not known in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of low-flow (0.75 l/min) and normal-flow (1.5 l/min) anesthesia on ONSD in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Seconder aims are regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2), bispectral index (BIS), and evaluate the status of cognitive function in the postoperative 24th hours.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Konya City Hospital

Konya, Karatay, 42020, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the regularly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures. It resulted in shorter hospital stays, improved cosmetic outcomes, and reduced bleeding and pain. However, during laparoscopic surgeries, the pneumoperitoneum is known to raise intracranial pressure (ICP), reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF), and as a consequence, cerebral hypoxia.

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), a noninvasive and continuous measuring method used to evaluate the appropriateness of cerebral perfusion, is therefore utilized in conjunction with cerebral oximetry to quantify regional tissue oxygenation. On the other, BIS is the most reliable technique for determining the level of sedation and anesthesia. Patients experience fewer intraoperative wake-ups thanks to BIS monitoring. Increased intra-abdominal pressure, decreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption and obstruction of lumbar venous plexus drainage, increased pressure in the sacral spaces' vascular compartment, and cerebral vasodilation brought on by hypercarbia are some of the suggested mechanisms for why ICP increases during laparoscopy. Intraventricular and intraparenchymal catheterization remains the gold standard for determining and monitoring ICP. However, due to worries about severe complications like bleeding, infection, and equipment failure, invasive ICP monitoring during laparoscopic surgery is almost impossible. Recently, ultrasound-guided optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement is a simple and reliable method of predicting elevated ICP.

There are various possible advantages of low-flow anesthesia. It boosts mucociliary clearance, preserves body temperature, lessens fluid loss, generates savings of up to 75%, and lowers greenhouse gas emissions as well as the cost of treatment. It also improves the flow dynamics of the breathed air. During laparoscopic procedures, low-flow anesthesia may be used as a means of preventing a rise in intracranial pressure and cerebral hypoxia. But low flow anesthesia effects on İCP are not known in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of low-flow (0.75 l/min) and normal-flow (1.5 l/min) anesthesia on ONSD in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Seconder aims are regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2), bispectral index (BIS), and evaluate the status of cognitive function in the postoperative 24th hours.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inclusion criteria of the patients will be determined as age between 18 and 65 years, ASA status 1-2.

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion criteria of the patients are defined as patients younger than 18, pregnant women, patients with any ophthalmological disease affecting optic nerve diameters, patients with acute or chronic eye disease, patients using drugs known to affect intracranial pressure, and patients abusing alcohol or psychoactive substances.

Treatment and study plan

Low flow technique in general anesthesia

Procedure

It will be used a low flow technique by giving airflow as 0.75 l/min after the intubation and will keep going on until the end of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Primary outcomes

  1. Optic nerve sheath diameter.

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

    The primer outcome of this study is to measure optic nerve sheath diameter during by using low-flow (0.75 l/min) and normal-flow (1.5 l/min) anesthesia on ONSD in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2)

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

    Seconder outcome 1 is regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) between low and normal flow technique.

  2. Bispectral index (BIS)

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

    Seconder outcome 2 is bispectral index (BIS) between low and normal flow technique.

  3. Cognitive function assessment by using Mini mental test

    Time frame: Perioperative period.

    Seconder aim 3 is to get Mini mental test score in the postoperative 24th.hours.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Konya City Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Effects of Low-flow and Normal-flow on Intracranial Pressure, Cerebral Oxygenation, and Bispectral Index in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Operation

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jul 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.