Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04195698

Open-Label Extension Study of Upadacitinib in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

This is a study for adults (18-75 years) who have successfully completed treatment either with Dupilumab or with Upadacitinib in the study M16-046. At the end of M16-046, they have the option to receive Upadacitinib with a duration of 52 weeks beyond the timeframe of Study M16-046. There will be a 30 day follow-up visit after the treatment period is completed.

Main objective of this study is to assess long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of upadacitinib in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who successfully completed treatment in the study M16-046.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Holdsworth House Medical Practice /ID# 218755, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants should have successfully completed treatment in the M16-046 study, without meeting any permanent discontinuation criteria.
  • Participant is judged to be in general good health (other than AD) as determined by the Principal Investigator and remains eligible as per the criteria for the study M16-046 to continue treatment in the long term extension study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Requirement of prohibited medications during the study treatment or would interfere with appropriate assessment of atopic dermatitis lesions.
  • Female participant who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering pregnancy during the study.

Treatment and study plan

Upadacitinib

Drug

Upadacitinib will be administered oral as tablet

Other names: ABT-494, RINVOQ

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: UPA/UPA arm: BL visit in Lead-In M16-046 to last dose in Long-Term Extension M19-850 (median time on follow-up is 536 days); DUPI/UPA arm: BL visit in Long-Term Extension M19-850 to last dose plus a 30-day follow-up (median time on follow-up is 399 days).

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as any adverse events that begin or worsen in severity after initiation of upadacitinib during Lead-In Study M16-046 for the UPA/UPA arm or this Study M19-850 DUPI/UPA arm through 30 days following the last dose of upadacitinib.

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    Time frame: UPA/UPA arm: BL visit in Lead-In M16-046 to last dose in Long-Term Extension M19-850 (median time on follow-up is 536 days); DUPI/UPA arm: BL visit in Long-Term Extension M19-850 to last dose plus a 30-day follow-up (median time on follow-up is 399 days).

    Treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored throughout the study to identify any adverse events of special interest that may indicate a trend or risk to participants. AESIs are defined as any adverse events that begin or worsen in severity after initiation of upadacitinib during Study M16-046 for the UPA/UPA arm or Study M19-850 for the DUPI/UPA arm through 30 days following the last dose of upadacitinib.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important (PCI) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: From Baseline to 30 days following last dose of study drug (Week 52)

    Clinical laboratory test values are considered PCI if they meet either the lower-limit or higher-limit PCI criteria defined in the categories below. Percentage of participants with PCI laboratory values are summarized for hematology and chemistry.

    The Number Analyzed is defined as the number of participants with at least one post-baseline value for the specific criteria.

    Post-baseline grade must also be more extreme (worse) than the baseline grade in order to be included in the count. If a participant does not have a baseline value then the participant would be counted in the numerator if the participant had at least one post-baseline.

    xULN = Times upper limit of the normal range.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important (PCI) Vital Sign Measurements and Physical Examination Findings as Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: From Baseline to 30 days following last dose of study drug (Week 52)

    PCI post-baseline vital sign values are summarized for categories: systolic and diastolic blood pressures [sitting], pulse rate [sitting], and weight. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCI value at Baseline and met the PCI criterion at least once during post-baseline are reported.

    The Number Analyzed is defined as the number of participants with at least one post-baseline value for the specific criteria.

    Post-baseline grade must also be more extreme (worse) than the baseline grade in order to be included in the count. If a participant does not have a baseline value then the participant would be counted in the numerator if the participant had at least one post-baseline.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3b, Open-Label Treatment Extension Study of Upadacitinib for the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Completed Treatment in Study M16-046

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 12, 2019
Registry last updated
Jan 9, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.