Fibrocentrum
Leiden, South Holland, 2321 GL, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT06322485
This study has been previously registered with the National Trial Registry (NTR6267) that has been cancelled. The registered trial has been automatically transferred to a new "Landelijk Trial Register", which does not contain all correct information on the current study and where no corrections can be made. Hence, the current study has been registered again with ClinicalTrials.gov.
The goal of this clinical trial is to study the effectiveness of an internet-based self-management intervention in adult patients with fibromyalgia. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be performed, in which 70 participants will be randomized to either the self-management intervention or a waitlist control condition (patients in the waitlist condition will receive the intervention after the intervention ends in the intervention group, i.e., after 6 months). The primary effect constitutes of the difference in change in pain coping between patients in the intervention and control condition from baseline to post-intervention. As secondary outcomes, a number of other psychological and physical outcome measures will be assessed (e.g., health-related quality of life, well-being, pain impact on daily life, pain cognitions). Also, cost-effectiveness of the intervention and the quality of the therapeutic relationship will be measured.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Leiden, South Holland, 2321 GL, Netherlands
Rationale: Fibromyalgia has a high clinical burden, with patients experiencing considerable pain, physical disability, and an often decreased health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Improving patients' skills in managing a chronic condition ("self-management") is increasingly recognized as vital in the treatment of somatic conditions and is becoming more common in clinical practice and research. In this study, the effectiveness of an internet-based self-management intervention focusing on coping skills related to chronic pain compared with a waitlist control condition is studied.
Objective: To study the effectiveness of the internet-based self-management intervention in patients with fibromyalgia.
Study design: An RCT will be performed, in which 70 patients will be randomized to either the internet-based self-management intervention or a waitlist control group. Baseline, post-intervention, 6-week, and three-month follow-up questionnaires will be used to measure primary and secondary outcomes.
Study population: Patients ≥18 years diagnosed with fibromyalgia (confirmed by their general practitioner or a medical specialist) who visit the 'Fibrocentrum', a fibromyalgia treatment centre in Leiden, The Netherlands, will be invited to participate in the study. Patients need to have a pain duration of a minimum of 3 months, be fluent in Dutch, be able to give informed consent, and own a computer with internet access. Difficulties with (written) communication and internet literacy, severe physical and psychiatric comorbidities that interfere with the study protocol (e.g., addiction, psychosis, and suicidal ideation), pregnancy, on-going psychological treatment elsewhere, and participation in other clinical trials are exclusion criteria.
Intervention: The cognitive-behavioral intervention begins with a face-to-face intake session in which personal goals for the intervention are set. Afterwards, the tailored self-management intervention, consisting of 6 modules, will be offered via an internet-based program. The first introductory module includes goal-setting and the last module includes relapse prevention; the four modules in between focus on learning how to cope with the consequences of a chronic condition in daily life. The topics of the modules are (1) activity, (2) mood, (3) thoughts, and (4) the social environment. At least once a week, a psychologist provides participants with feedback and motivational support through messages in a secured mail box in the internet-based program. After finishing the internet-based intervention, two booster sessions will take place via telephone (1 month and 2,5 months after the program). Patients will be called by their psychologist and their goals will be evaluated and strategies to strengthen the achieved results will be discussed.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary effect will be determined by comparing the VAS pain coping scores after the intervention between the waitlist control group and intervention group, corrected for baseline VAS pain coping scores. As secondary outcomes, several other psychological and physical outcomes will be measured (e.g., HR-QoL, pain cognitions, pain impact on daily life, well-being), as well as quality of the therapeutic relationship and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In the waitlist control condition, patients will receive the intervention after the intervention ends in the intervention group (after 6 months). In the intervention group patients will be offered an internet-based self-management intervention, which could improve their pain coping and other psychological and physical outcomes. No risk is involved with participation in this study. The only burden for participants is time investment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
An internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy with six modules.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
A visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 will be used to measure pain coping, with higher scores indicating better pain coping. The primary endpoint is the difference in change in pain coping between patients in the intervention and control condition from baseline to post-intervention (immediately after the intervention).
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
A VAS from 0 to 10 will be used to measure well-being, with higher scores indicating better well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Illness cognitions will be assessed by the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ; using Helplessness and Acceptance scales). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "completely". Higher scale scores reflect greater use of the assessed construct.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Pain coping strategies will be assessed by the Pain Coping Inventory (PCI) that comprises six scales, namely, Pain Transformation, Distraction, and Reducing Demands (three active pain coping strategies), and Retreating, Worrying, and Resting (three passive pain coping strategies). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "hardly ever" to "very often". Higher scale scores reflect greater use of the assessed pain coping strategy.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Illness perceptions will be assessed by the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). The Identity scale consists of the sum of yes-rated items (patients rate whether they believe certain symptoms to be related to their illness). Furthermore, the remaining scales described below are rated on a 5-point Likert type scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". High scores on the Timeline Acute/Chronic and Cyclical, Consequences, and Emotional Representations scales indicate beliefs about the chronicity and cyclical nature of the illness, the negative consequences of the illness, and patients' emotional experience of their illness. High scores on the Personal and Treatment Control and Illness Coherence scales reflect positive beliefs about perceived control and an understanding of the illness.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
A VAS ranging from 0 to 10 will be used to measure pain, with higher scores reflecting more severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Part 1 of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory-Dutch Language Version (MPI-DLV) will be used with Interference and Pain Severity scales and as exploratory measures Support, Life Control, and Affective Distress. Items are rated on different 7-point Likert scales, with higher scores reflecting greater intensity in a subscale.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Health-related quality of life will be assessed with the RAND-36, which consists of 36 items that are averaged, resulting in eight health scale scores, namely Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Role Limitations due to Personal or Emotional Problems, Social Functioning, Emotional Well-being, Energy/Fatigue, Bodily Pain, and General Health Perceptions. The questionnaire also includes one item on perceived change in health. Besides, physical and mental health composite scores will be calculated. Higher scores reflect more favorable health states.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) consists of 10 self-rated items covering the impact of fibromyalgia on different aspects of functioning and well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting worse fibromyalgia impact.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.
Health-related quality of life will be assessed by the Five-Level Version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). In this questionnaire, 5 dimensions are measured in 5 items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. A 5-point Likert scale ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems" is used for every dimension, with higher scores reflecting more problems in a dimension. A VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = "The best health you can imagine" to 100 = "The worst health you can imagine") is applied as well, with higher scores indicating a better health state as perceived by the patient.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.
The intervention will be economically evaluated with the Five-Level Version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Five items cover 5 dimensions of health-related quality of life: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. A 5-point Likert scale ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems" is used in the questionnaire, with higher scores indicating more issues in a dimension. The 5 dimensions can be summed into a health state and utility values can be calculated for these health states.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.
The intervention will be economically evaluated with the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), which measures health-care utilization.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.
The intervention will be economically evaluated with the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). Productivity losses are assessed in three modules in this questionnaire, so that certain types of productivity losses can be omitted when these are not applicable to a population.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
The experience and satisfaction of patients with the intervention, and the perceived effect of the intervention will be assessed with an evaluation questionnaire comprising various numerical rating scales, Likert scales, and open questions.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention.
The Internet-specific Therapeutic Relationship Questionnaire (ITRQ) will be used to assess the expected/perceived patient-provider interaction. The ITRQ comprises 10 items that are measured on a 10-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "completely agree". The questionnaire consists of two scales (Internet-specific Time and Attention and Internet-specific Reflection and Comfort) and a total score. Higher scores reflect a stronger therapeutic relationship.
Leiden University
Other
An Online Self-management Intervention for Patients With Hand Fibromyalgia - a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05998369
Abdominal Pain, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06752590
Fibromyalgia, Muscular Diseases
Nagakute, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT05237050
Chronic Pain, Fibromyalgia
Gap, Hautes Alpes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07665411
Fibromyalgia, Muscular Diseases
Covilha, Castelo Branco District, Portugal
View Trial Details