Hospital Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, 28034, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07416422
The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of IH after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) open repair according to the abdominal wall closure technique used. The main question it aims to answer is: Does prophylactic mesh reinforcement prevents from IH after AAA open repair?
Patients were divided in 2 groups, fascial closure with small bites and prophylactic mesh reinforcement (Group A); and primary fascial closure with small bites alone (Group B) and were performed a clinical examination at least once within the first 24 post-operative months, where the clinical diagnosis of IH could be evaluated.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Madrid, 28034, Spain
This study included patients treated for AAA between January 2019 and December 2021 in our institution.
Two groups were evaluated, group A where patients were treated by small-bites closure plus PMR (onlay mesh) and group B where patients received primary closure with small-bites alone.
The surgeries were performed as per standard of care in our department, and the decision to use the onlay mesh was per surgeon discretion.
The main variable of study was the presence of incisional hernia evaluated by both clinical and image examination (at least once within the first 24 post-operative months). Patients included in the study that had any post-operative CT scan for any reason were evaluated and diagnosed with that imaging technique.For remaining patients, one radiologist with experience in ultrasound imaging performed diagnosis.
A descriptive analysis of the population and variables collected was carried out using the statistical analysis package IBM SPSS statistics v22 (IBM Co).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
One radiologist with experience in ultrasound imaging performed diagnosis. This exploration was performed using a single-blind technique. Patients included in the study that had any post-operative CT scan for any reason were evaluated and diagnosed with that imaging technique
Time frame: 0-2 years.
Presence of IH during follow-up in both groups and a comparison between both groups represented in a Kaplan meier curve
Time frame: 0-2 years
Differences between both groups in surgical wound complications
Time frame: 0-2 years
differences between both groups in surgical hospitalization times
Time frame: 0-2 years
Differences between both groups in need for reintervention due to IH
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Other
No Clear Benefit With the Use of Onlay Mesh by Vascular Surgeons for Incisional Hernia Prevention in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05528107
Incisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen, Neurologic Manifestations
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT05351970
Hernia, Incisional Hernia
Elche, Alicante, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT04166201
Incisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen, Incisional Hernia of Midline of Lower Abdomen
Zagazig, Sharqya, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05424484
Hernia, Incisional Hernia
Zagreb, Croatia
View Trial Details