Hospital General Universitario de Elche
Elche, Alicante, 03203, Spain
NCT Number: NCT05351970
Urgency surgeries are often performed in a stressful setting with critical patient involved. In this context, laparotomy closure can sometimes be the most neglected part of the procedure. Barbed sutures, frequently used in laparoscopic procedures, have proven to be effective in maintaining traction.
The aim of this study is to describe the incisional hernia rate after emergency midline laparotomy, according to the suture utilized, evaluated at one month and one year postoperative.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Elche, Alicante, 03203, Spain
A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with urgency midline laparotomy during 2018-2019. Group A was represented by patients with slowly absorbable monofilament continuous suture, while Group B included patients with barbed suture closure.
Main variables were hernia rates one month and one year after surgery, diagnosed by physical exploration and/or imaging. Demographic characteristics, risk factors, among other descriptive determinations were registered.
A total of 128 patients were performed an emergency midline laparotomies, and 110 meet all inclusion criteria. There was equality between sex and median age was 65 years old. Significative differences were observed regarding incisional hernia at 30 days, being less frequent when barbed suture was utilized. These differences were not present at the long-term reevaluation (one year).
In conclusion, midline laparotomy closure must be performed within quality standards. The lack of studies regarding emergency laparotomy closure, the European Hernia Society stated that no recommendations can be given on this patients. Barbed suture appears as a promising option for closure in these specific circumstances, but needs further study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Efficacy of barbed and monofilament closure regarding incisional hernia
Time frame: Hernia 1 month
Incidence of incisional hernia at one month after surgery
Time frame: Hernia 1 year
Incidence of incisional hernia at one year after surgery
Time frame: 1 month
Incidence of postoperative surgical site infection
Time frame: 1 month
Incidence of early abdominal evisceration
Time frame: 1 month
Incidence of other medical complications
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana
Other
Barbed Suture vs. Monofilament for Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure, a Retrospective Analysis
Acronym: BAROTOMY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05424484
Hernia, Incisional Hernia
Zagreb, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT06195332
Hernia, Incisional Hernia
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT06286124
Hernia, Incisional Hernia
Leiden, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05528107
Incisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen, Neurologic Manifestations
Moscow, Russia
View Trial Details