Appleton Institute CQUniversity, School of Medical, Health, and Applied Sciences, Adelaide Campus
Wayville, South Australia, 5034, Australia
NCT Number: NCT05032729
The primary objective is to assess the impact of two nutritional interventions vs. placebo on objective and subjective sleep measures in athletes. Participants receive one beverage on each of three consecutive nights in a randomized manner. It is hypothesized the two nutritional interventions will result in significant improvements in sleep onset latency, and will not result in a negative impact on next-day cycling performance.
The secondary objective is to assess the impact of the nutritional interventions vs. placebo on next-morning performance (physical, cognitive function, and balance).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Wayville, South Australia, 5034, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
250 ml beverage consumed at 21:00 hours
250 ml beverage consumed at 21:00 hours, matched in appearance and taste to the active beverages
Time frame: Time from sleep onset to 8:00 a.m.
Measured in minutes during polysomnography. Longer is better.
Time frame: From sleep onset till 8:00 a.m.
Occurrences measured in minutes during polysomnography. None or less are better.
Time frame: From sleep onset to 8:00 a.m.
Measured as a % of time asleep over time in bed during polysomnography. Higher efficiency is better
Time frame: Transition from wakefulness to sleep
Measured in minutes during polysomnography. Shorter time to onset is better.
Time frame: From sleep onset to REM sleep
Measured in minutes during polysomnography. Shorter time to REM is better.
Time frame: From sleep onset to deep sleep
Measured in minutes during polysomnography. Shorter time to stage 3 deep sleep is better.
Time frame: Measured continuously throughout the night from sleep onset to 8 a.m.
Measured in minutes during polysomnography. Normal stage pattern is better.
Time frame: From sleep onset to 8 a.m.
Measured as a count during polysomnography. Less arousals are better.
Time frame: From sleep onset to 8 a.m.
Measured as a count during polysomnography. Less awakenings are better.
Time frame: From sleep onset to 8 a.m.
Measured as a count during polysomnography. Normal amount of stage shifts are better.
Time frame: Every thirty minutes from 20:00 p.m. until 22:30 p.m.
Subjective arousal level at present state rated 1 (extremely alert) to 9 (Very sleepy, great effort to keep awake). Sleepiness before bed is better.
Time frame: 08:30 a.m. following polysomnography
Rated from 1 (very good) to 5 (poor). Lower number is better.
Time frame: 08:30 a.m. following polysomnography
Measured in hours and minutes. Higher number is better.
Time frame: 08:30 a.m. following polysomnography
Measured in hours and minutes. Lower number is better.
Time frame: During a 10 minute time trial cycling exercise performance testing at 9:30 a.m.
Cycle ergometer to measure power output in watts, with instructions to give maximal effort. Higher watts are better.
Time frame: During a 10 minute time trial cycling exercise performance testing at 9:30 a.m.
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale of 6 (lower) to 20 (higher) intensity levels.
Time frame: During a 10 minute time trial cycling exercise performance testing at 9:30 a.m.
Measured in beats per minute (bpm) by heart rate monitor
Time frame: 10 minute testing period at 9 a.m. Higher performance is better.
Psychomotor vigilance reaction time task (PVT-192) handheld ambulatory monitoring
Time frame: 9 a.m. before cognitive performance attention testing.
Rated on visual analog scale from 0 (feeling not at all alert) to 100 (feeling completely alert). Feeling more alert is better.
Time frame: 9 a.m. before cognitive performance attention testing
Rated on visual analog scale from 0 (expecting to not respond fast at all) to 100 (expecting to respond very fast). Better or worse not applicable.
Time frame: 9 a.m. before cognitive performance attention testing
Rated on visual analog scale from 0 (expecting to not respond accurately at all) to 100 (expecting to respond very accurately). Better or worse not applicable.
Time frame: 9 a.m. before cognitive performance attention testing.
Postural sway area 95cm/2 measured by computerized force platform. Less sway is better.
PepsiCo Global R&D
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07251452
Behavior, Cognitive
Toledo, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06994104
Behavior, Behavior, Addictive
Istanbul, Marmara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT04477577
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details