Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03621475

Novel Arm Restraint in the Intensive Care Unit

The goal of this pilot is to evaluate a novel restraint device in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) is feasible.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

University of Vermont College of Medicine

Burlington, Vermont, 05405, United States

About this study

The goal of this Fast-Track Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) project is to optimize and test a novel arm restraint in older critically ill mechanically ventilated patients that may increase mobility; reduce agitation, use of sedative medications, and delirium; and exhibit high satisfaction and acceptability among hospital staff, family members, and patients. Older mechanically ventilated patients are often immobilized with wrist restraints to prevent self-extubation and are sedated to reduce agitation caused by their restraints and endotracheal (breathing) tube. This sedation and immobility lead to complications, including delirium and muscle weakness, that are independently associated with long term cognitive impairment, reduced physical functioning, and mortality. Specifically, the incidence and duration of delirium in the ICU are strongly and independently associated with long-term cognitive impairment that is similar to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.

Healthy Design has developed a novel restraint device that allows arm mobility but prohibits hands from reaching oral/nasal endotracheal and feeding tubes or intravenous lines. Because it permits mobility, the novel restraint may reduce agitation and the need for sedatives. The objectives of this pilot study are to evaluate the novel restraint in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future RCT is feasible.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • >65 years old
  • Physician order for use of bilateral wrist restraints
  • Requiring mechanical ventilation with actual or expected total duration of >48 hours
  • Expected ICU stay >3 days after enrollment (to permit adequate exposure to proposed intervention)
  • Not deeply sedated (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS] score > -2)

Exclusion criteria

  • Upper extremity impairments that prevent use of novel restraint device (e.g. amputation, arm injury)
  • Limited mobility of either upper extremity prior to admission (e.g. frozen shoulder, severe arthritis)
  • Pre-existing primary systemic neuromuscular disease (e.g. Guillain-Barre)
  • Neuromuscular blocker infusion (eligible once infusion discontinued if other inclusion criteria met)
  • Pre-existing severe cognitive impairment or language barrier prohibiting outcome assessment
  • Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 6 days from enrollment
  • Incarcerated
  • Severe skin breakdown on either upper extremity

Treatment and study plan

Novel restraint

Device

Use of a novel arm restraint

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Treatment-Emergent Severe Adverse Events [Safety]

    Time frame: Through study day 2

    Safety will be measured by the number (i.e. < 1 in 5 participants had a treatment emergent safety event per their on study time) across all of the following measures listed below. Incidence does not have to be per person-year; in this case it is incidence of safety adverse event during the study period.

  2. Number of Clinician or Patient Lacerations

    Time frame: Through study day 2

    Grade 2b or higher skin laceration (per Skin Tear Audit Research [STAR] Skin Tear Classification System) in patient or clinician from any sharp edges of device. The STAR grading system ranges from grade 1a at best to 3 at worst. Each laceration is given an individual score based on appearance.

  3. Number of Pressure Ulcers From Device

    Time frame: Through study day 2

    Development of pressure ulcer from device of Stage 3 or greater per 2016 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Stages. This staging system provides an individual score to each pressure ulcer based on appearance from stage 1 (best) to stage 4 (worst)

  4. Number of Self-removals of Novel Restraint

    Time frame: Through study day 2

    Self-removal of novel restraint

  5. Number of Damaging Events to Hospital Bed Rendering it Non-functional

    Time frame: Through study day 2

    Any damage to hospital bed from restraint device rendering it non-functional

  6. Number of Damaging Events to ICU Equipment

    Time frame: Through study day 2

    Any damage to ICU equipment (e.g. ventilator) rendering it non-functional

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Self-extubations

    Time frame: Through study day 2

    Will record instances where participants remove own endotracheal tube

  2. Number of Movements of Upper Extremities

    Time frame: Continuously through study day 2

    Actigraphy counts of upper extremities as measured by Philliips actigraph, a device that records individual movements

  3. Richmond Agitation Sedation Score [RASS]

    Time frame: Median of multiple RASS scores collected over first 2 days of study period

    Agitation measured by the median of Richmond agitation sedation score [RASS] collected longitudinally every hour while wearing restraints. This score measures sedation and agitation from a scale of -5 (most sedated) to +4 (most agitated)

  4. Satisfaction With Novel Device as Assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST) Satisfaction Score

    Time frame: Study day 2

    Satisfaction with the novel restraint device will be measured with the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) satisfaction tool. This 12-item questionnaire is scored from 1 (lowest satisfaction) to 5 (highest satisfaction).

  5. Delerium Score

    Time frame: 6-day study period

    We intended to measure delirium score as accessed by the CAM-ICU. However, during the study we were unable to measure it because it was too often incorrectly charted by nursing. We therefore have nothing to report for this planned outcome.

Other outcomes

  1. Enrolling Adequate Numbers of Patients

    Time frame: 6-day study period

    Number of participants enrolled in the study

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Vermont

Other

Collaborators

  • Healthy Design, LLC

Registry information

Official study title

Pilot Study of a Novel Arm Restraint For Critically Ill Patients

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Aug 8, 2018
Registry last updated
May 29, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.