Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04627298

Normalizing HPV Vaccination in Preteens With a Serious Video Game

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States and causes genital warts and cancers in both females and males. Vaccination against HPV is recommended for routine use in those aged 11-12 years old, yet is underutilized. The study's premise is that preteens are relevant decision makers who can be motivated to initiate and complete the HPV vaccine series (assuming parental consent and provider recommendation). This study evaluates a serious video game to engage preteens in the decision to pursue HPV vaccination. The hypothesis is that preteens who are assigned to the video game will be more likely to initiate and complete HPV vaccination than preteens who are not assigned to the video game.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

11 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Joan R, Cates

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-3365, United States

About this study

The aims of this pilot study are to (1) evaluate whether preteens who receive the video game have better self-reported outcomes related to knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccine, vaccination self-efficacy and decisional balance compared with preteens who do not receive the game; and (2) evaluate outcomes related to immersion in the video game and game play experiences of preteens who played the game. HPV vaccination initiation and completion data are collected from practices for both preteens who receive the game and a comparison group who do not receive the game.

This is a multiple baseline study based in primary care practices in North Carolina and conducted over 3 waves of 16 practices each wave. The goal is to recruit 160 boys and girls ages 11-12 and not vaccinated against HPV for each wave. Participants are recruited by their primary care providers to enroll in the study. Parents give consent and preteens give assent.

An original video game, Land of Secret Gardens, is created for the study. The game is a metaphor for protecting seedlings (body) with a potion (vaccine). Points to buy seeds and create the potion are earned by playing minigames. The minigames include several versions of finding secret objects in a garden shed and another involves playing a shield game with blue spikey balls (i.e., HPV) before they land on budding plants. Throughout the play, players are exposed to messaging about HPV and the benefits of the HPV vaccine.

Preteens are randomly assigned to an intervention group to play the video game or to a comparison group that will not play the game. Participants are asked to complete baseline and postintervention surveys. Measures included are scales for knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccine, vaccination self-efficacy and decisional balance about deciding to pursue HPV vaccination. Participants in the intervention group are also asked about story immersion and game play.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • preteens 11-12 who had not received any doses of HPV vaccination
  • recruited by primary care practices in North Carolina
  • parent signed HIPAA release
  • willing to take baseline and postintervention surveys
  • access to internet and mobile device or personal computer

Exclusion criteria

  • preteens who had received at least one dose of HPV vaccine

Treatment and study plan

educational video game for preteens to support HPV vaccination

Behavioral

An educational video game developed for 11-12 year olds to increase interest in and decision to pursue HPV vaccination.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Initiating vaccination with one dose of HPV vaccine

    Time frame: approximately 9 months post intervention for each cohort total

    HPV immunization records are obtained for all preteen participants from their primary care practices

  2. Number of Participants completing HPV vaccination series with either 2 or 3 doses of HPV vaccine in accordance with vaccination schedule for participant

    Time frame: approximately 9 months post intervention for each cohort total

    HPV immunization records are obtained for all preteen participants from their primary care practices

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean HPV Vaccination Knowledge Scale Score (5 items, range 1-3) is collected from both intervention and comparison group participants via Qualtrics surveys; higher score indicates greater knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccination

    Time frame: Baseline and postintervention surveys 4 months apart

    Five items ask whether HPV vaccination can prevent genital warts, prevent cervical cancer, prevent anal cancer, prevent throat cancer, is recommended for 11-12 year old boys and girls

  2. Mean HPV Vaccination Self-Efficacy Scale Score (8 items, range 1-3) is collected from both intervention and comparison group participants via Qualtrics surveys; higher score indicates greater confidence in getting HPV vaccination

    Time frame: Baseline and postintervention surveys 4 months apart

    Eight items ask how confident was participant in getting the HPV vaccine when consider side effects, pain, parental decision, faintness or dizziness, expense, inconvenience, weak recommendation from doctor, friends' knowledge of vaccination

  3. Mean HPV Vaccination Decisional Balance Scale Score (4 items pro and 5 items con, range 1-3) is collected from intervention and comparison group participants via Qualtrics surveys; higher pro mean score and lower con mean score indicate greater support

    Time frame: Baseline and postintervention surveys 4 months apart

    Four items asked how important is the decision to get HPV vaccination (protection from HPV, protection from cancers and warts, protection from a sexually transmitted infection, and less likely to spread HPV); 5 items asked reasons for not getting HPV vaccination (too much time, too embarrassing to talk to parents, too embarrassing to talk to doctor, parents would not approve, parents would think participant was having sex)

  4. Number of participants who evaluate video game characteristics via PENS: Physical/Emotional/Narrative Presence Scale (27 items) is collected from intervention group via Qualtrics; higher score indicates agreement with video game characteristic

    Time frame: Postintervention survey (4 months after completing baseline survey)

    Twenty seven items asked about participant immersion in the story: in-game autonomy, in-game competence, PENS questions related to immersion in the game, PENS questions related to intuitive controls, and interest and enjoyment

  5. Number of participants who self-report characteristics of video game play (18 items) is collected from intervention group via Qualtrics; higher score indicates report of video game characteristic

    Time frame: Postintervention survey (4 months after completing baseline survey)

    Eighteen tasks are described in the video game, including playing a shield game with virus like balls, finding hidden objects in garden sheds, creating a vaccine potion

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Registry information

Official study title

Normalizing Preteen HPV Vaccination With Practice-based Communication Strategies

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 13, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 13, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.