Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00370253

Noradrenalin vs Terlipressin in Hepatorenal Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to determine whether noradrenalin is as effective and safe as terlipressin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a major complication of cirrhosis; it is characterized by functional renal failure and poor prognosis. Arterial dilation is a key pathogenic event of HRS, leading to reduction of the effective blood volume, homeostatic activation of vasoactive systems and renal vasoconstriction with decrease in renal blood flow. The clinical signs of HRS vary depending on the clinical pattern. HRS type 1 is characterized by a rapidly progressive renal failure; HRS type 2 by a moderate and more stable renal failure. HRS type 1 has a very poor short term prognosis, with a median survival of only about 2 weeks; patients with HRS type 2 have a median survival of about 6 months. The management of HRS still constitutes a major challenge. Liver transplantation is the ideal treatment, but it has important inherent drawbacks, such as the organ shortage and the time needed to perform the transplant, that is too long to consent the survival of these patients. The management of HRS has focused on improving renal function, thus extending patients survival and allowing the performance of the liver transplant. In the last years, remarkable results have been obtained using vasoconstrictor drugs. By improving the effective blood volume, vasoconstrictors induce the suppression of homeostatic vasoactive systems and increase renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate.Among vasoconstrictors, terlipressin, a V1 vasopressin agonist, has currently the best efficacy pedigree. However, it is expensive and is not available in many countries, including North America. More recently, it was suggested that alpha-adrenergic drugs such noradrenalin and midodrine may be also effective in HRS. Noradrenalin would have the potential advantage of wider availability and of lower cost. The current prospective randomized study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of noradrenalin vs terlipressin in patients with HRS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hepatorenal syndrome
  • Age: 18-75 years
  • Informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (more than 3 nodules)
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Ongoing bacterial infection
  • Ongoing or recent (less than one week) bleeding
  • Cardio-pulmonary failure
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Peripheral artery disease
  • Arterial hypertension

Treatment and study plan

Terlipressin

Drug

1mg/4 h per day

Noradrenalin

Drug

0,1 mcg/kg/min

Primary outcomes

  1. Renal function at the beginning and at the end of therapy

    Time frame: two weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Circulatory function

    Time frame: two weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Noradrenalin vs Terlipressin in Patients With Hepatorenal Syndrome.A Prospective, Randomized Study

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2007
First posted
Aug 31, 2006
Registry last updated
Apr 11, 2008

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.