Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07425132

Non-Invasive Electrocardiographic Imaging for Personalized Arrhythmia Care in Congenital Heart Disease

To assess the accuracy and clinical utility of a novel non-invasive ECGI mapping system in identifying arrhythmogenic regions of interest in patients with congenital heart disease.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Madrid, 28007, Spain

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Felipe Atienza, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0034915868290

About this study

Congenital heart disease (CHD) survivors often present with complex anatomical remodeling and progressive atrial or ventricular arrhythmias that significantly impact their quality of life and long-term prognosis. Traditional diagnostic tools, such as the standard 12-lead ECG, frequently fall short in these patients due to displaced cardiac structures and atypical conduction pathways. While invasive electroanatomical mapping remains the gold standard for arrhythmia characterization, there is a critical clinical need for non-invasive, high-resolution tools that can streamline procedural planning and improve the precision of therapeutic interventions like catheter ablation or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

This single-center, prospective pilot study investigates the clinical utility and accuracy of a novel Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) system. This system aims to overcome the limitations of conventional mapping by offering real-time, non-invasive 3D reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity. A key innovation of this technology is its ability to utilize statistical estimation algorithms to generate cardiac geometries, potentially bypassing the need for time-consuming medical image segmentation (CT/MRI) in standard cases, while allowing for personalized anatomical integration in complex congenital presentations.

Study Workflow

After obtaining informed consent, participants scheduled for elective electrophysiological (EP) studies or device implantations will follow a multi-modal diagnostic protocol:

  • Body Surface Mapping: Placement of the 128-electrode vest and 3D torso reconstruction to localize electrode positions relative to the heart.
  • Standard 12-Lead ECG Acquisition: Traditional recordings are captured to serve as a baseline for head-to-head accuracy comparisons.
  • Intraoperative Invasive Mapping: During the clinical procedure, high-density endocardial mapping is performed using standard-of-care electroanatomical mapping systems to provide the definitive "ground truth" for arrhythmia localization.
  • Anatomical Imaging Integration: Review of existing CT or MRI data (or acquisition based on clinical indication) to perform personalized segmentation.
  • Comparative Analysis: A blinded expert review will compare the localization of "regions of interest" (ROI) between the ECGI system, the 12-lead ECG, and the invasive endocardial maps.

Patient Profile The trial focuses exclusively on patients with congenital heart disease, a cohort currently underrepresented in non-invasive mapping research. Eligible participants include those undergoing EP studies for tachycardia or those requiring device therapy (pacemakers/CRT) where optimal lead placement is critical.

Safety and Risk Mitigation The ECGI mapping process is entirely non-invasive and adds no procedural risk to the patient. No additional invasive maneuvers are required beyond what is already clinically indicated for the patient's standard care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with congenital pathologies and a clinical indication for an invasive electroanatomical study and/or implantation of intracavitary stimulation devices.
  • Written informed consent form signed to participate in the study.
  • Ability to stand upright to allow for the 3D torso reconstruction required by the ECGI system.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients under 18 years of age.
  • Inability to undergo endocardial catheterization (e.g., pregnant or breastfeeding women).
  • Physical or mental incapacity to understand and accept the informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Electrocardiographic imaging

Diagnostic Test

A 128-electrode vest is placed on the patient's torso to record high-resolution body surface potentials. The torso geometry is then reconstructed using photogrammetry, capturing electrode positions and surface topology. The cardiac geometry can be either estimated through a Statistical Shape Model (SSM) generating a patient-specific representation of the heart or obtained by segmentation from CT/MRI. This enables non-invasively reconstructing the epicardial electrical activity of both atria and ventricles.

Primary outcomes

  1. Geometry threshold complexity

    Time frame: 1 year

    Validation of Statistical vs. Personalized Geometry: A primary objective is to determine the "threshold of complexity" where statistical models fail. In minor structural variations, statistical estimation may suffice, reducing radiation and costs. However, in major congenital malformations, the study hypothesizes that personalized CT/MRI segmentation is essential for maintaining spatial accuracy.

  2. ECGi and invasive mapping correlation

    Time frame: 1 year

    Agreement with Invasive Mapping: By correlating non-invasive epicardial maps with high-density intracavitary electrograms (EGM), the study seeks to validate the ECGI system's precision in identifying conduction blocks, rotational drivers, or focal triggers specific to the CHD population.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of ECGI vs. 12-lead ECG

    Time frame: 1 year

    Sensitivity and specificity of ECGI vs. 12-lead ECG

  2. Mean distance error (in mm) between statistical geometry maps and CT/MRI-based maps

    Time frame: 1 year

    Mean distance error (in mm) between statistical geometry maps and CT/MRI-based maps

  3. Procedural time impact of incorporating non-invasive mapping data (in minutes)

    Time frame: 1 year

    Procedural time impact of incorporating non-invasive mapping data (in minutes)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Felipe Atienza, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0034915868290

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundacion para la Innovacion en Biomedicina (FIBMED)

Other

Registry information

Acronym: EPIC

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.