Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05194566

Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia

The aim of the trial is to determine whether 75Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) synchronized with therapeutic linguistic tasks is an effective form of therapy for post-stroke aphasia.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Think & Speak Lab at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

There are about 15 million strokes worldwide each year. Of this group, about 30% suffer from aphasia. Aphasia is a speech-language disorder associated with exceptional difficulty performing daily communication activities. If no improvement is observed within the first months after the stroke, a complete recovery is unlikely, and the therapy can last for years.

Up to date, speech and language therapy is a standard of care for post-stroke aphasia, however the process is long and demanding.

In the past, several clinical trials aimed to verify the efficacy of language training paired with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), however recent meta-analysis indicates only possible effectiveness (Level C evidence) of anodal tDCS in chronic post-stroke aphasia.

To boost the effects of aphasia rehabilitation, effective brain stimulation protocol still needs to be developed.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can be an interesting alternative to tDCS, as it is able to influence cortical excitability and activity.

Stimulation within high gamma oscillations (60-500Hz) might allow for better speech-language processing, as this band is considered to be the cognitive index of linguistic processes. Moreover, a short period of 75Hz tACS over the motor cortex suggested the positive impact of high-gamma tACS on brain plasticity.

The aim of this RCT is to determine whether 75Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) paired with therapeutic linguistic tasks is an effective form of therapy for post-stroke aphasia, measured as an ability to name trained items at 12 weeks follow-up.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Individuals with aphasia (assessed using the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination) who perform the Naming Task in the range of 10%-60% accuracy will be included in the study. The overall baseline score in the Naming Task will be estimated from the two baseline measurements.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of aphasia: Broca's or mixed (based on the assessment of a Speech Language Pathologist).
  • presence of a focus of injury in the left hemisphere (within one hemisphere only) as a result of the first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (based on CT/MRI examination);
  • chronic stage of the disease - time since the stroke occurred over 6 months.
  • ability to achieve an accuracy in the Naming Task of 10-60%.
  • 18-80 years
  • right-handedness before the stroke.
  • ability to give informed written consent.
  • fluency in English.

Exclusion criteria

  • severe cognitive, auditory or visual impairment that would preclude cognitive and language testing - inability to follow a two-step command.
  • presence of metal implants in the skull.
  • presence of major untreated or unstable psychiatric disease.
  • history of epilepsy or seizures.
  • ongoing medication that increases the risk of epileptic seizures.
  • presence in the body of cardiac stimulator, pacemaker or vagus nerve stimulator (implanted).
  • history of speech, language, hearing, or intellectual disability during childhood.
  • pregnancy (based on declarations)

Exclusion criteria

during the trial:

  • high intolerance to stimulation.
  • occurrence of an epileptic seizure.
  • other previously absent neurological or mental symptoms

Withdrawal criteria:

  • high intolerance to stimulation (participants experience severe discomfort during stimulation);
  • occurrence of an epileptic seizure;
  • other previously absent neurological, physical or mental symptoms.

Treatment and study plan

tACS

Device

Neurostimulation will be done using the Neuro Device tCS, which is a certified transcranial electrical stimulator. The device consists of a stimulator with a touch screen, two electrodes and a soft, flexible cap to ensure stability of the electrodes on the head.

Other names: transcranial alternating current stimulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage score in the Naming Task (trained words)

    Time frame: 12-week follow-up

    The Baseline Naming Task consists of 344 images representing nouns and the images will be presented on the computer screen. The task is to name the presented noun by producing the name of the item out loud. The answer is scored on a three-point scale (1 - not able to name correctly, 2 - named with phonological or semantic paraphasia, 3 - correct). Items marked with a score of 3 are considered accurate. From the baseline assessment, a random list of 50 incorrectly named words will be trained in therapy. Minimum score is 0% (inability to name any objects) and maximum score is 100% (accuracy in naming all presented objects), where a higher score indicates a better health outcome

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage score in the Naming Task (trained words)

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention and 6-week follow-up

    The Baseline Naming Task consists of 344 images representing nouns and the images will be presented on the computer screen. The task is to name the presented noun by producing the name of the item out loud. The answer is scored on a three-point scale (1 - not able to name correctly, 2 - named with phonological or semantic paraphasia, 3 - correct). Items marked with a score of 3 are considered accurate. From the baseline assessment, a random list of 50 incorrectly named words will be trained in therapy. Minimum score is 0% (inability to name any objects) and maximum score is 100% (accuracy in naming all presented objects), where a higher score indicates a better health outcome

  2. Number of correct answers without supporting cues

    Time frame: during treatment sessions

    Number of correct answers on the fifth level (no cueing) during the therapy task. Greater number of correct responses indicates better response to treatment.

  3. Accuracy of naming during the therapy session

    Time frame: during treatment sessions

    Number of correct responses to presented stimuli. Greater number of correct responses indicates better response to treatment.

  4. Percentage Score in Naming Task (untrained words)

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention, 6-week and 12-week follow-up

    Percentage score calculated for words not trained in therapy task to assess generalization. Patients are presented with 25 words not trained during therapy sessions. Each answer is scored on a three-point scale (1 - not able to name correctly, 2 - named with phonological or semantic paraphasia, 3 - correct). Items receiving a score of 3 are marked as correct, with a maximum total number of correct items being 25. Minimum score is 0% (0/25- inability to name any objects) and maximum score is 100% (25/25- accuracy in naming all presented objects), where higher score indicates better response to treatment.

  5. Communication Effectiveness Index (CETI)

    Time frame: pre-treatment, immediately after the intervention, 6-week and 12-week follow-up

    The participants primary communication partner rates the participants' ability to perform in sixteen communication situations on a visual analog scale with the lowest value (a score of 0) as "not at all able" and the greatest value (a score of 10) as "as able to as before", where higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

  6. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE)

    Time frame: pre-treatment, 12-week follow-up

    Oral Expression Subtest - the speech language pathologist assesses the patient with the oral expression portion of the BDAE. Areas assessed include automatic sequences, repetition of words and sentences, responsive and confrontational naming, and screening of letters and numbers. Each item receives a point for correctness with a maximal score of 48

  7. Accuracy of masking measurement: Patient and Researcher

    Time frame: the end of the last treatment session

    The opinion of the patient and of the researcher on receiving the placebo vs. active stimulation. The patient and researcher provide their guess/opinion as to whether the stimulation received during treatment was active or sham. It will be taken after the end of the last treatment session.

  8. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: before and after each treatment session/during the treatment

    Stimulation tolerance/side effects are measured using a visual analog scale with seven components (headache, fatigue, sleepiness, dizziness, pain on scalp, tingling on scalp, burning sensation on scalp, and itching on scalp). Ratings will be taken before and after each session. Full scale 0-10 per component. Higher score indicates a higher degree of each side effect.

  9. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) Score

    Time frame: pre-treatment, immediately after the intervention, 6-week and 12-week follow-up

    Assesses the ability to complete daily tasks pertaining to self-care, communication, interaction with others, and physical mobility. The SAQOL includes 17 questions, where questions are rated on a 1-5 scale with a score of 1 indicating greater disability and 5 indicating none. Total score ranges from 17-85. Scores are averaged across three domains (physical, communication, and psychosocial), with lower scores indicating lesser ability (lower quality of life) and higher scores indicating great ability or independence (greater quality of life)

  10. General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)

    Time frame: pre-treatment, immediately after the intervention, 6-week and 12-week follow-up

    Identifies minor psychiatric disorders in the general population and within community or non-psychiatric clinical settings such as primary care or general medical out-patients. GHQ-12 is a 12-items scaled version that assesses somatic symptoms, anxiety, and insomnia, social dysfunction, and severe depression. A total score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating worse conditions

  11. Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

    Time frame: pre-treatment, immediately after the intervention, 6-week and 12-week follow-up

    Assesses the perceived ability to bounce back or recover from stress. The possible score range on the BRS is from 1 (low resilience) to 5 (high resilience). Higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

  12. BDNF genotype

    Time frame: pre-treatment

    Saliva samples will be collected to test for typical vs. atypical brain plasticity biomarkers, as BDNF genotype may interfere with results of therapy paired with transcranial electrical stimulation. Research suggests that individuals with an atypical BDNF genotype are less receptive to the beneficial effects of speech-language therapy paired with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, compared to individuals with typical BDNF genotype

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Aidan Rogers

CONTACT

[email protected]

(718) 308-9450

Tertia Jeppson

CONTACT

[email protected]

312-238-6163

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

QVITI S.A.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 18, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.