Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03549377

Neural Correlates of Self-regulation on Academic Functioning

The main objectives of the study include: 1. What are the differences in self-regulation and its neurophysiological and neuroanatomical correlates between college students with poor and excellent sleep functioning? 2. Does sleep functioning (assessed both by questionnaires and actigraphy), and self-control/self-regulation (questionnaire and imaging data) predict academic achievement and problem behaviors in college students?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–24 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, 40506, United States

About this study

Based on the Self-Control Theory, individual differences in characteristics such as impulsivity, risk-seeking, and self-regulation consistently predict health-compromising and problem behaviors as well as academic functioning and success in adolescents and young adults.[1] Although suboptimal self-regulation is normative in adolescence and young adulthood, [2] it might result in negative consequences for adolescents' and young adults' health and well-being, including substance use, school/college dropout, or troubles with law. A recent line of research suggested that self-regulation problems are associated with insufficient and poor sleep.[3] As adolescents and young adults frequently report poor sleep functioning,[4] their self-regulation abilities might be further compromised by unfavorable sleep functioning with consequences for youths' problem behaviors and academic success. To mitigate this problem, some efforts have followed to ensure that adolescents get enough quality sleep (e.g., delayed school start times). However, the associations between sleep functioning, self-regulation, academic functioning, and problem behaviors were established predominantly using questionnaire data. Neurophysiological correlates of these associations have not been extensively studied. In the proposed study, this gap in scholarship will be addressed by linking sleep functioning to self-regulation indicated by neuropsychological and neuroanatomical data, and predicting academic achievement and problem behaviors with sleep and self-regulation. This explorative, pilot study is a first step in efforts to understand the issue; it will be carried out with a college student sample (N = 48, 50% female) which will also have implications for future research focused on adolescents (middle and high school students). Pilot data will inform the development of a larger study that will include adolescents (middle and high school students) and will support grant applications. Results will have a potential for prevention /intervention programs and policy targeting youth, such as school start times setting. This study will be carried out as a collaboration between the Department of Family Sciences at the University of Kentucky and the Department of Human Development and Family Studies at the Texas Tech University. Data will be collected following the same procedures described in this application both at the University of Kentucky and Texas Tech campuses. Research team at the Texas Tech University has submitted their own Institutional Review Board (IRB) application that is now being reviewed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Healthy college-age youth between the ages of 18 and 24 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Gross impairment of vision or hearing
  • Inability to read and follow written instructions
  • Physical, neurological, or concurrent psychiatric impairments
  • Regular intake of psychotropic medication (such as methylphenidate used to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), antidepressants, or anti-anxiety medication)
  • A history of head injury that resulted in loss of consciousness/a history of brain surgery/or seizures
  • A current/past history of smoking and/or alcohol or drug abuse (i.e., five or more drinks in one sitting or 15 drinks or more during a week for men, and four drinks on one occasion or eight drinks over the course of a week for women; additionally, regular drug use, including marijuana)
  • Current pregnancy
  • Any metallic objects in your body (such as braces, pacemakers, surgical devices, piercings that cannot be removed etc.) Enrollment of the subjects will start in May 2018 and will be finished by the end of December 2018.

Treatment and study plan

Deception

Behavioral

Participants will be deceived during delayed gratification task.

Primary outcomes

  1. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses for Stop Signal Reaction Time Task (SSRT) Stop Signals

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of functional magnetic resonance imaging reactivity of the whole brain while performing a Stop Signal Reaction Time Task

  2. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of fMRI BOLD responses for a Go-NoGo Continuous Performance Task (CPT)

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of functional magnetic resonance imaging reactivity of the whole brain while performing a Go-NoGo Continuous Performance Task

  3. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of brain structural connectivity

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of brain structural connectivity as measured by diffusion tensor imaging and analyzed using tract-based spatial statistics

  4. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of brain structure

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Rested versus sleep deprived group differences of brain structure as determined by voxel based morphometry of structural magnetic resonance imaging data

Other outcomes

  1. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in sleep time preferences

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Morningness-eveningness Questionnaire

  2. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in hours of sleep

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional studyUp to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Sleep quantity

  3. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in low self-control

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Low Self-Control Scale (LSC)

    • Low self-control scale (24 items) measures low self-control.
    • The total score ranges from 1 to 5.
    • Five subscales called impulsivity, simple tasks, risk seeking, physical activities, self-centered, and temper, each provide subscale score ranging from 1 to 5.
    • Higher values indicate higher lower self-control, in other words, worse outcomes.
    • A total score is developed by averaging all 24 items across all subscales. Subscale scores also represent the averaged responses to their corresponding items.
  4. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Zuckerman Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking Scale

    • Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking Scale (19 items) measures impulsivity and sensation seeking.
    • Total score ranges from 0 to 19. Impulsivity (i.e., one of the two subscales) score ranges from 0 to 8 (8 items), whereas Sensation Seeking score ranges from 0 to 11 (11 items).
    • For total as well as for each subscale scores, higher values indicate more impulsivity and sensation seeking, respectively.
    • Total and subscale scores are computed by summing the responses (19, 11, and 8 items respectively).
  5. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in internalizing behaviors

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Weinberger Adjustment Inventory

  6. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in deviance/externalizing subscales

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Normative Deviance Scale, Short Form

    • Normative Deviance Scale-Short Form (21 items); the scale measures involvement in deviant and norm-violating behaviors.
    • Total scores range from 1 to 5. Seven subscale scores (i.e., vandalism, alcohol use, drug use, school misconduct, general deviance, theft, assault) each range from 1 to 5, 3 items each.
    • Higher scores indicate greater deviance (more frequent involvement), in other word, worse outcome.
    • A total score, as well as subscale scores, are computed by averaging responses of the corresponding items.
  7. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in GPA/SAT/ACT Scores

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Grade point average (GPA)/Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT)/American College Test (ACT) Score

  8. Academic Dishonesty Scale

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in school attitudes

  9. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in academic concentration

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Academic Concentration Measure

  10. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in academic aspirations and expectations

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Academic Expectations and Aspirations

  11. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in school attitudes

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    School Attitudes Assessment Survey

  12. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test, Dimensional Change Card Sort Test, List Sorting Working Memory Test

    Time frame: Up to 45 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    NIH toolbox Cognition Battery

  13. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test, Dimensional Change Card Sort Test, Picture Sequence Memory Test,

    Time frame: Up to 30 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    NIH toolbox Cognition Battery

  14. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in commission errors in Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), , omission errors

    Time frame: Up to 30 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)

  15. Rested versus sleep deprived group differences in commission errors in a Go-NoGo CPT, omission errors

    Time frame: Up to 30 days following selection for inclusion based on prescreen, cross-sectional study

    Go/NoGo continuous performance task (CPT)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alexander Vazsonyi

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Neural Correlates of the Associations Between Sleep Functioning, Self-regulation, Academic Functioning, and Problem Behaviors

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 8, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.