Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06053294

Neural and Metabolic Factors in Carbohydrate Reward

Dietary factors contributed to nearly 50% of all cardiometabolic deaths in the US in 2012, making it one of the leading causes of preventable death in the US, second only to tobacco use. Human diets and food choices can't help but be influenced by the ubiquitous availability of processed foods of high-energy density and low nutrient content, consumption of which can lead to obesity, type II diabetes, heart disease, and other types of metabolic dysfunction. Surprisingly, food reinforcement does not rely on perceived energy density. Rather food reinforcement is associated with actual energy density and therefore, on an implicit knowledge of caloric content. That implicit knowledge must have a neural signature and a mechanism by which the gut communicates nutritive value to the brain. There is evidence, at least for fat and carbohydrates, that these pathways are separable, but terminate in a common neural structure, the dorsal striatum or caudate. This could be one mechanism by which modern processed foods high in both fat and carbohydrate are so sought after and readily consumed, In fact, when experimentally tested, fat and carbohydrate combinations were more reinforcing calorie for calorie than fat or carbohydrates alone and the level of reinforcement correlated with activity in reward- related brain areas. Beyond simple reinforcing value, it is known from the literature on drugs of abuse that the faster a drug is arrives at the brain, the higher it's abuse potential, however, little is known about how the kinetics of nutrient excursion influence food preference, choice, and brain activity. This project aims to test this specifically for carbohydrate reward.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC

Roanoke, Virginia, 24016, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Alexandra G DiFeliceantonio, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

540-526-2285

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI between 18.5-30 kg/m2
  • Not pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study participation
  • Residing in the Roanoke area and/or willing/able to attend sessions at the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute
  • Able to speak and write in English

Exclusion criteria

  • Current inhaled nicotine use
  • History of alcohol dependence.
  • Current or past diagnosis of diabetes or thyroid problems.
  • Taking medications known to influence study measures (including antiglycemic agents, thyroid medications, sleep medications)
  • Active medical or neurologic disorder.
  • Current shift work (typical pattern of work/activity overnight)
  • Previous weight loss surgery
  • Adherence to a special diet within the past 3 months (e.g., low-carb or ketogenic diet, exclusion of food groups/specific macronutrients, intermittent fasting, etc.)
  • Allergy to any food or ingredient included in the study diets, meals, or beverages
  • Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study participation
  • Claustrophobia
  • Contraindications for MRI, including pacemaker, aneurysm clips, neurostimulators, cochlear or other implants, metal in eyes, regular work with steel, etc.

Treatment and study plan

CS- Beverage

Other

Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-): Flavored beverage solution with sweetness-matched sucralose. Participants will consume flavored beverage solutions sweetened with sucralose to match the sweetness of 110 calories of sucrose in 6 exposure sessions within 1 week. One exposure session will include pre- and post-consumption blood draws and indirect calorimetry measurement over a 2-hour period. The other 4 exposure sessions will occur at specified times outside the laboratory sessions. Subjective ratings of internal state (i.e., hunger, fullness, and thirst) will be collected throughout each exposure. Subjective ratings of liking and wanting of each beverage will also be assessed.

CS+Fast

Other

(CS+): Flavored beverage solution with 110 calories of sucrose. Participants will consume flavored beverage solutions containing 110 calories of sucrose in 6 exposure sessions within 1 week. One exposure session will include pre- and post-consumption blood draws and indirect calorimetry measurement over a 2-hour period. The other 4 exposure sessions will occur at specified times outside the laboratory sessions. Subjective ratings of internal state (i.e., hunger, fullness, and thirst) will be collected throughout each exposure. Subjective ratings of liking and wanting of each beverage will also be assessed.

CS+Slow

Other

(CS+): Flavored beverage solution with 110 calories of maltodextrin. Participants will consume flavored beverage solutions containing 110 calories of maltodexrin in 6 exposure sessions within 1 week.One exposure session will include pre- and post-consumption blood draws and indirect calorimetry measurement over a 2-hour period. The other 4 exposure sessions will occur at specified times outside the laboratory sessions. Subjective ratings of internal state (i.e., hunger, fullness, and thirst) will be collected throughout each exposure. Subjective ratings of liking and wanting of each beverage will also be assessed.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in preference- liking

    Time frame: at the end of the study; 5 weeks after start of study

    Subjective ratings of liking of flavors used in the intervention will be assessed at baseline and after the intervention.

    The generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale will be used. The scale is anchored by descriptors of "Most Disliked Sensation Imaginable" and "Most Liked Sensation Imaginable" at the lower and upper ends, respectively. The score is determined by the place on the scale participants select (range of scale is 0-100). An increase in score from baseline to post-intervention indicates an increase in liking.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in preference- wanting, rated

    Time frame: at the end of the study; 5 weeks after start of study

    Subjective ratings of wanting of flavors used in the intervention will be assessed at baseline and after the intervention. A Visual Analog Scale will be used. Participants select a place on the line that corresponds with their subjective rating, and the score is determined by the place selected (range of scores is 0-100). The line is anchored by polar opposite descriptors ("Do not want at all" and "Want very much"). An increase in score from baseline to post-intervention indicates and increase in wanting.

  2. Change in preference- wanting, ad lib intake

    Time frame: at the end of the study; 5 weeks after start of study

    Ad libitum intake will be used as a measure of wanting in a post-test session. Participants will be provided each beverage used during the intervention and asked to drink as much or as little of them as they would like over a 30- minute period.

  3. Change in preference- wanting, forced choice

    Time frame: at the end of the study; 5 weeks after start of study

    Forced choice will be used as a measure of wanting in a post-test session. Participants will be provided each of the beverages used during the intervention and asked to choose 1 to take home with them.

  4. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response to beverages

    Time frame: at the end of the study; 5 weeks after start of study

    In a post-test session, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans will be performed while beverages (without calories) used during the intervention are delivered through a custom manifold fitted to a head coil and connected to a pump system that allows precisely timed and measured delivery of liquids.

  5. Blood glucose response to beverages

    Time frame: Each week for 3 weeks during the study

    Blood glucose will be assessed at baseline and at set time points for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in one exposure session.

  6. Blood insulin response to beverages

    Time frame: Each week for 3 weeks during the study

    Blood insulin will be assessed at baseline and at set time points for 2 hours after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

  7. Energy expenditure in response to beverages

    Time frame: Each week for 3 weeks during the study

    Indirect calorimetry will be used to determine energy expenditure at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

  8. Respiratory exchange ratio in response to beverages

    Time frame: Each week for 3 weeks during the study

    Indirect calorimetry will be used to determine respiratory exchange ratio at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

  9. Substrate oxidation in response to beverages

    Time frame: Each week for 3 weeks during the study

    Indirect calorimetry will be used to determine substrate oxidation at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alexandra G DiFeliceantonio, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

5405262285

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Neural and Metabolic Factors in Carbohydrate Reward: An Examination of Speed

Acronym: CARB

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Sep 25, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.