Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04582929

Neubotulinum Toxin Injection in Cerivical Dystonia

24-Week Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Cross-over design in Multicenter Study of 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) injection for Cervical Dystonia in patient diagnosed with cervical dystonia according to clinical diagnosis. It was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, quality of life and the comparesion the improvement after treatment by of 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) injection.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Three documented studies showed the clinical use of botulinum toxin for migraine prophylaxis.(26) Neubotulinum Toxin Type A, (Neu-BoNT/A), (Neuronox® ) (Medytox Inc, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea), also known as Meditoxin in Korea, is a newly manufactured BoNT-A (Neu-BoNT/A) that was developed to provide features close to onabotulinum toxin A (5). Neuronox was tested in a murine model, and its effect on muscle force generation was equivalent to Botox® (ona-BoNT/A) (6). A previous multicenter randomized controlled trial showed that Neuronox and Botox® have equivalent efficacy and safety for the treatment of spastic equinus in children with cerebral palsy (6). However, 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) has not yet been investigated in cervical dystonia. This study is the extension of the NCT03805152

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

•The subject has to grant permission to enter into the study by signing and dating the informed consent form before completing any study-related procedure such as any assessment or evaluation not related to the normal medical care of the subject.

Able to give written inform consent and retained one copy of the consent form

  • Male or female subject, aged between 18 - 100 years old.
  • Subject diagnosed to be cervical dystonia.
  • Female subject in good health and sexually active was instructed by the investigator to avoid pregnancy during the study and to use condom or other contraceptive measure if necessary. The subject was required to have a negative urine pregnancy test before being eligible for the study. (At each of the subsequent visit, a urine pregnancy test was performed).
  • Subject judged to be reliable for compliance for taking medication and capable of recording the effects of the medication and motivated in receiving benefits from the treatment.
  • Subject should undergo a normal physical and neurological examination TWSTRS, CDIP-58, SF36, and CES-D • during the whole study period

Exclusion criteria

  • The subject was pregnant or lactating.
  • The subject was a female at risk of pregnancy during the study and not taking adequate precautions against pregnancy.
  • The subject had a known hypersensitivity to any of the test materials or related compounds.
  • The subject was unable or unwilling to comply fully with the protocol.
  • The subject received any unlicensed drug within the previous 6 months.
  • Treatment with investigational drug (s) within 6 months before the screening visit. • The subject had previously entered in this study.

Subject with past history of botulism, other neuromuscular disorder (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert - Elton Syndrome)

  • Subject with significant medical / neurological / psychiatric disorders such as blood dyscrasia, thrombocytopenia, rheumatoid arthritis, congestive heart failure, coronary artery heart diseases, dementia, psychosis, or other conditions which could influence the clinical trial.
  • Known history of drug abuse (narcotic (s), cafergot, or others) or drug (botulinum toxin type A) allergy.
  • Unable to cooperate fill-up TWSTRS, CDIP-58, SF36, and CES-D • Patient who planned to schedule elective surgery during the study.
  • The used of aminoglycoside antibiotics and curare were not allowed during the study.

Treatment and study plan

Neuronox ® Injection

Drug

Neuronox ® 50 or 100 unit intramuscular injection

Other names: Neuronox ® 50 unit or 100 unit

Primary outcomes

  1. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating scale ( TWSTRS)

    Time frame: 24 week

    WSTRS ranged( 0-85 by summation of all 3 sub- scales ) higher represent a worse outcome TWSTRS Sub- scale includes

    TWSTRS-Total severity scale ( maximum 35 points) TWSTS-Disability scale (maximum 30 points) TWSTS-Pain scale (maximum 20 points)

  2. Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile 58 ( CDIP-58)

    Time frame: 24 week

    Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 items composed of 8 sub-scale Total score by summation of 8 subscale higher represent a worse outcome Analysis both total score (range 58-290 points) And sub-scale analysis composed of Head and neck symptoms ( 6 items ; 6-30 points) Pain and discomfort ( 5 items ; 5-25 points) Upper limb activity ( 9 items ; 9-45 points) Walking ( 9 items ; 9-45 points) Sleep ( 4 items ; 4-20 points) Annoyance ( 8 items ; 8-40 points) Mood (7 items ; 7-35 points) Psychosocial functioning ( 10 items ; 10-50 points)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparesion the quality of life 36 item ( SF 36)

    Time frame: 24 week

    Comparesion the quality of life (SF 36) pre- and post- 12 and 24 week ttreatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) this score has special formula calculation

  2. Depression scale measured by Center of Epidemiologic Study of Depression 20 item ( CES-D 20)

    Time frame: 24 week

    Comparesion of CES-D pre- and post- 12 and 24 week treatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) Score ranged from 20-80 points higher represent a worse outcome

  3. Depression scale measured by Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: 24 week

    Comparesion of PHQ-9 pre- and post- 12 and 24 week treatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) There is the special scale calculation for diagnosis Major depressive disorder, Other depressive disorder and others,higher points /score represent a worse outcome ranged 0-27 points plus 3 points Total summation of 5-9 points indicate Minimal symptoms, 10-14 Minor depression ++ or Dysthymia* or Major depression, mild , 15-19 points Major depression, moderately severe

    ≥ 20 Major depression, severe (range PHQ 9 0-27 ) higher represent a worse outcome

  4. Clinical Global Impression of Changed ( CGIC)

    Time frame: 24 week

    Comparesion of CGIC pre- and post- 12 and 24 week treatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) (range -3 to 3 points: -3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Department of Medical Services Ministry of Public Health of Thailand

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

24-Week Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Cross-over Design in Multicenter Study of 50 Unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 Unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) Injection for Cervical Dystonia in Thai Patients

Acronym: NTCD

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 12, 2020
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.