University of Florida Health Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
NCT Number: NCT04916444
We applied 16 sessions of rTMS over 4 consecutive days for adult patients suffering from cervical dystonia who received botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections on a regular basis. The TMS protocol took place 9 weeks following their last BoNT injection. The primary outcome measure was improvement in cervical dystonia as measured by the TWSTRS scale. The secondary outcome measures included mood, cognition, and gait measures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
This was a crossover study design in which patients were randomized to active or sham stimulation during session 1 (S1) and then crossed over to the condition they were not randomized to at first during session 2 (S1). Patients who were receiving BoNT injections for cervical dystonia on a regular basis but only noted benefit from BoNT for 9 weeks or less were eligible to participate. The total study protocol took place over 24 weeks. During week 1, patients had their regularly scheduled botox injections. During week 9, patients underwent either active or sham rTMS, as detailed below. They had outcome measures obtained at week 9 (S1:T0; baseline/pre-TMS), week 10 (S1:T1; post-TMS), and week 12 (S1:T2; 2 weeks post-TMS). At week 12, they underwent their regularly scheduled BoNT injections. During week 21, patients underwent either active or sham rTMS, whichever condition they were not randomized into during the first session. They then had outcome measures obtained at week 21 (S2:T0; baseline/pre-TMS), week 22 (S2:T1; post-TMS), and week 24 (S2:T2; 2 weeks post-TMS).
The neurostimulation protocol was as follows: The dPMC target was defined as 1 cm medial and 2 cm anterior to the site of RMT acquisition. The rTMS protocol was as follows: each session consisted of 1-Hz rTMS over the dPMC for 30 minutes (1800 pulses) at 90% of the RMT. Patients received 4 sessions per day for 4 consecutive days with a 10-minute break between each session. The daily duration of the rTMS protocol, including breaks, lasted approximately 160 minutes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a painless, noninvasive form of neurostimulation. This study uses an accelerated protocol in which the neurostimulation pulses are delivered in 4 sessions per day over 4 consecutive days (16 total sessions). Active or sham rTMS will be provided at 9 weeks following botox injections.
Other names: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Time frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
This is an objective scale evaluating patients on a variety of features including maximal excursion, duration, effects of sensory trick, shoulder elevation, range of motion, and time. Scores range from 0 to 85 where a higher score indicates more severity.
Time frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
This is a 21-question survey evaluating depression in patients on a 0 to 3 scale, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score 63, and higher score indicating a higher level of depression.
Time frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Patients are instructed to connect circles in ascending numerical order and are scored on how quickly they are able to complete the task. A longer amount of time indicates more severe cognitive impairment (in general, more than 78 seconds to complete Part A is considered impaired).
Time frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Patients are instructed to connect circles in ascending numerical order and are scored on how quickly they are able to complete the task. A longer amount of time indicates more severe cognitive impairment (in general, more than 273 seconds to complete Part B is considered impaired).
Time frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test is a test of rule-learning and conceptual flexibility. The participant is required to learn to sort a series of cards according to one of three principles (color, form or number) based on response feedback. This measure is computed by calculating the ration of total errors to trials administered and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test is a test of rule-learning and conceptual flexibility. The participant is required to learn to sort a series of cards according to one of three principles (color, form or number) based on response feedback. This measure reflects the "density" of perseverative errors in relation to the overall test performance. It is computed by calculating the ration of total errors to trials administered and multiplied by 100.
University of Florida
Other
Acronym: D-TWIST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02689466
Central Nervous System Diseases, Cervical Dystonia
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00702754
Cervical Dystonia, Dyskinesias
View Trial DetailsNCT02504905
Central Nervous System Diseases, Cervical Dystonia
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04871451
Cervical Dystonia, Dyskinesias
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details