Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07524517

NeoSHARK: Anatomical Versus Round Facemasks for Breathing Support in Preterm and Term Newborn Infants

When babies can't breathe effectively, we can use a facemask to give them breaths and oxygen. There are various types of facemasks that can be used, including round and anatomical (triangular) masks, depending on the preference of the hospital, but it is unclear if one is better for the baby. Both types of facemasks are recommended in international guidelines, without any advice whether one is better than the other. Previous studies published by our research group demonstrated that a variety of different masks are used around the hospitals in Ireland. If a lot of air is leaking around the mask, it means that the baby is not getting the full breathing support that we are trying to give. We currently do not have enough evidence to say which type of mask is better to reduce the risk of this potential leaking of air.

Recent studies have suggested that holding a mask with two hands (instead of one) is better in round facemasks. The combination of an anatomical mask and a two-handed hold has not yet been studied in babies.

In this study, we will compare two different facemasks (round and anatomical) when holding the mask on a baby's face with two hands to help them breathe. We will randomly allocate each baby to either a round mask or an anatomical (triangular) mask and we will measure how much air leaks out around the mask during each breath. We will do this in babies who are in the neonatal unit.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The National Maternity Hospital Dublin

Dublin, Leinster, D02 YH21, Ireland

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Anna Curley

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Eoin O'Currain

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Laura J Ryan

CONTACT

[email protected]

0851551609

About this study

Delivering effective facemask ventilation is an essential component of neonatal resuscitation. However, facemask leak of up to 60% in preterm neonates and airway obstruction are common and can be associated with ineffective ventilation of the baby and clinical instability (O'Currain 2019). Multiple characteristics may influence the effectiveness of facemask ventilation, such as operator technique, infant gestation, airway anatomy and tone, as well as facemask size and shape.

The Neonatal Resuscitation Programme (NRP) allows for either type of facemask as per local practice, without recommending a particular shape of that facemask. A recent national airway survey by our group demonstrated that 8/19 centres in Ireland use both anatomical and round facemasks in clinical practice, with 11 different sizes and shapes of facemasks in clinical use in neonatal units in Ireland. While studies to date have not found a difference between anatomical and round masks in neonatal manikins, these studies only included facemask ventilation delivered with a one-handed hold, rather than a two-handed hold. Emerging evidence, including benchtop and clinical data, suggests that a two-handed hold is superior to a one-handed hold in round facemasks. The combination of an anatomical mask and a two-handed hold has not yet been studied in a clinical setting.

This study will compare the measured leak in mask ventilation with a two-handed hold, delivered by a healthcare professional in the neonatal team, using an anatomical versus a round facemask with standardised mask size. The facemasks will be assessed by a randomised controlled trial, with the anatomical mask as the intervention and the round mask as the control. The population that will be studied is neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), at any gestation, who the clinical team have decided to intubate. A member of the research team, who will provide an out-of-hours on call service, will attend the event. The relevant outcomes will be measured by the Monivent Neo100, which will be set up by the research team. Standardised mask size, as per local protocol, will be used, with the sensor module placed between the mask and the T-piece with an adaptor. The outcomes will assess the effectiveness of both the intervention and control, including ventilation parameters recorded by the Monivent Neo100 and the clinical stability of the patient. The primary outcome of this study is the percentage mask leak. A research team member will record data for primary and secondary outcomes. The event will be filmed for post-hoc video analysis. The outcome assessor will be blinded to the group allocation.This research project will take place over 10 months, with an interim analysis to ensure recruitment is projected to achieve sample size.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All term and preterm neonates in the neonatal unit who the clinical team have decided to intubate, with or without pre-medication, and who require mask ventilation prior to intubation attempt.

Exclusion criteria

  • Neonates with a congenital malformation that would impact mask seal will not be included.

Treatment and study plan

Intervention: Anatomical facemask

Device

Anatomical facemask, with a two-handed hold, to deliver positive pressure ventilation via a mask.

Control: Round facemask

Device

Round facemask, with a two-handed hold, to deliver positive pressure ventilation via a mask.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mask leak

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Mask leak percentage, as measured by the Monivent Respiratory Function Monitor (RFM), with a minimum of 5 breaths collected.

    Maximum of 2 episodes of facemask ventilation will be collected, with values averaged.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lowest oxygen saturation

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Lowest oxygen saturation detected on the bedside clinical monitoring (Philips Intellivue MX800) during the period of facemask ventilation, recorded by a member of the research team.

  2. Highest supplemental FiO2 used during facemask ventilation

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Highest percentage FiO2 used during the period of facemask ventilation, as indicated by the set dial on the Neopuff.

  3. Positive inspiratory pressure during facemask ventilation

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Positive inspiratory pressure used during the period of facemask ventilation, as measured by the Monivent Neo100 respiratory function monitor.

  4. Percentage of obstructed breaths during facemask ventilation

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Percentage of obstructed breaths during the period of facemask ventilation, as measured by the Monivent Neo100 respiratory function monitor.

  5. Tidal volume during facemask ventilation

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Measured tidal volume during the period of facemask ventilation, as measured by the Monivent Neo100 respiratory function monitor.

  6. Number of times facemask position is adjusted during facemask ventilation

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Number of times clinical team needs to adjust mask position during the period of facemask ventilation.

  7. Duration of facemask ventilation

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Time duration of facemask ventilation

  8. Crossover to other handhold

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    If allocated two-handed hold: Number of times clinical team elect to switch to one-handed hold.

    If allocated one-handed hold: Number of times clinical team elect to switch to two-handed hold.

  9. User opinion of mask hold

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Survey of operator opinions about mask hold used, and their usual preference.

  10. Lowest heart rate

    Time frame: Over a maximum of 20 minutes

    Lowest heart rate detected on the bedside clinical monitoring (Philips Intellivue MX800) during the period of facemask ventilation, recorded by a member of the research team.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Eoin O'Currain

CONTACT

[email protected]

003531 6373498

Laura J Ryan

CONTACT

[email protected]

+353851551609

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University College Dublin

Other

Registry information

Official study title

NeoSHARK: Neonatal Study of Two-Handed Anatomical Versus Round facemasK Ventilation in Preterm and Term Infants; a Randomised Controlled Trial

Acronym: NeoSHARK

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
Registry last updated
May 12, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.